anyone else notice that the actress who they got to play cousin vickie, the vickie who is supposed to be the kids age, is THIRTY FOUR. They really cast a 34 year old as a 20 year old? She isn't even slightly attractive, she looks like an old, worn-out hooker.
If you think she isn't hot, and you're actually a man, I suggest you check your sexuality. Interesting that you seem so down on her but went to the effort of looking her up and finding out how old she is. What's with that, just looking for something to rag about?
Sorry ragreen, I have standards. Might I suggest you setting some up for yourself one day pal, stop banging all those 1s and 2s, work your way up to a respectable 6 or 7. See, as someone with an ounce of intellect I could tell she was much older than the others simply using my eyes. So I took the 30 seconds to see how old she really was. Crazy huh! Someone uses facts to back up their argument, shocking.
then you are in the minority, and thats a great thing. thats a very good thing. it's nice that you dont judge guys.
but, that was not just some "internet blog" that was the Washington post doing a survey and most women said money was the number one thing when it comes to marriage. (not values or religious beliefs or personality or even looks)
so if the guy rating women from 1 to 10 that bothered you deserves to get a tattoo, should women that care about money get a tattoo warning guys as well? would that be equal?
Im just saying, And I have heard a lot of women talk about the height thing, they won't even talk to a guy if he is below 5.7, you understand that would make a lot of guys feel mad right?
I didn't mean to come out as rude in my first reply but when I saw the guy talking about rating women from 1-10 and I saw your "tattoo" response to his post, it made me think about how most people tend to ignore the fact that both genders can be shallow when it comes to that. And it reminded me of the survey. I tend to see that often too, guys get picked on for stuff that both genders do. I guess we are all a little bit shallow deep inside
The sheer amount of grotesque heifers on here claiming she's anything but extremely unattractive is humorous. Guys trying to score e-points here that they can look beyond extreme unattractiveness is pathetic at best. The women claiming there's nothing wrong are just SJWs who think anyone and everyone is beautiful. Nothing is more pathetic than the people who've responded in this thread, you all need to seek medical attention immediately, the level of mental retardation is severe.
My only problem with her is that they didn't use the original Vicki! I wonder why not. She certainly didn't lose her looks and her character of Jenna on 30 Rock is similar to Cousin Vicki in a lot of ways. Jane would have been 29 in 1997, younger than this other actress.
Anyone know why Jane did not want to/was not asked to reprise the role?