MovieChat Forums > Vegas Vacation (1997) Discussion > what the hell is wrong with vickie?

what the hell is wrong with vickie?


anyone else notice that the actress who they got to play cousin vickie, the vickie who is supposed to be the kids age, is THIRTY FOUR. They really cast a 34 year old as a 20 year old? She isn't even slightly attractive, she looks like an old, worn-out hooker.



look at me, im hot http://www.salon.com/sept97/mothers/obese970922.gif - stephcha

reply

I disagree, I always thought Vicki looked very pretty, and to me she DID look around Audrey's age.

reply

I was very surprised when I found out how old she was.

reply

I had no idea she was that old. I think she did a great job and was very attractive in this and fit the part.

reply

Vicky I think is a little older anyway than the kids, but so what? As long as she can play the part who cares?

In the first 2 movies the actresses who play Audrey are both older than Rusty.

Just because we lose today's battle doesn't mean we've lost tommorow's war.

reply

Of course knowing Cousin Eddie he might've had a 34 year old daughter at the time, been 10 years old when he knocked up Catherine. :) ha ha

Hoo woo woo woo, do it hit hit, Gitter! Ooo ooo ott too OOO! Snuffer eet HOO doo!

reply

the character vicky is an old worn out hooker.

___________________
uh huh dot com

reply

+1



***

Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time!

reply

If you think she isn't hot, and you're actually a man, I suggest you check your sexuality. Interesting that you seem so down on her but went to the effort of looking her up and finding out how old she is. What's with that, just looking for something to rag about?

reply

Sorry ragreen, I have standards. Might I suggest you setting some up for yourself one day pal, stop banging all those 1s and 2s, work your way up to a respectable 6 or 7. See, as someone with an ounce of intellect I could tell she was much older than the others simply using my eyes. So I took the 30 seconds to see how old she really was. Crazy huh! Someone uses facts to back up their argument, shocking.



look at me, im hot http://www.salon.com/sept97/mothers/obese970922.gif - stephcha

reply

[deleted]

yeah...because women Don't do this as well right........... :

lol check this out!

http://thoughtcatalog.com/james-b-barnes/2014/09/heres-the-one-thing-w omen-care-about-most-in-a-relationship-and-why-its-disappearing/

reply

[deleted]

then you are in the minority, and thats a great thing. thats a very good thing. it's nice that you dont judge guys.

but, that was not just some "internet blog" that was the Washington post doing a survey and most women said money was the number one thing when it comes to marriage. (not values or religious beliefs or personality or even looks)

so if the guy rating women from 1 to 10 that bothered you deserves to get a tattoo, should women that care about money get a tattoo warning guys as well? would that be equal?

Im just saying, And I have heard a lot of women talk about the height thing, they won't even talk to a guy if he is below 5.7, you understand that would make a lot of guys feel mad right?

reply

[deleted]

I didn't mean to come out as rude in my first reply but when I saw the guy talking about rating women from 1-10 and I saw your "tattoo" response to his post, it made me think about how most people tend to ignore the fact that both genders can be shallow when it comes to that. And it reminded me of the survey.
I tend to see that often too, guys get picked on for stuff that both genders do. I guess we are all a little bit shallow deep inside

reply

The sheer amount of grotesque heifers on here claiming she's anything but extremely unattractive is humorous. Guys trying to score e-points here that they can look beyond extreme unattractiveness is pathetic at best. The women claiming there's nothing wrong are just SJWs who think anyone and everyone is beautiful. Nothing is more pathetic than the people who've responded in this thread, you all need to seek medical attention immediately, the level of mental retardation is severe.

reply

wtf does that have to do with my comment????

reply

Learn to read above a 4th grade level and it would make sense.

reply

you are replying to the wrong person baby

reply

need to have warnings tattooed on your foreheads


cannot help the bad judgment. some women deserve these sorts of men that can be seen a mile away (even without the tattoo)

***

Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time!

reply

My only problem with her is that they didn't use the original Vicki! I wonder why not. She certainly didn't lose her looks and her character of Jenna on 30 Rock is similar to Cousin Vicki in a lot of ways. Jane would have been 29 in 1997, younger than this other actress.

Anyone know why Jane did not want to/was not asked to reprise the role?

reply

Anyone know why Jane did not want to/was not asked to reprise the role?


To keep things consistently inconsistent?

reply

I concur.

reply

somewhere, someone has missed the joke. they completely recast all the kids every movie.



***

Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time!

reply

I don't know what you're talking about, I thought she looked damn good. Had a nice tight body.

reply

it made sense for me to have an older actress play a young character.

specially seeing where they were living with getting so much sun and radiation lol 
she actually looked better than I expected.

reply