I hated this movie. It went nowhere, made no sense, and used cheap tactics of being seemingly scary. I can't believe I spent 3 dollars on it.
shareWell I personally enjoyed it, so well you are allowed to not like it.
It's the 80's. Do alot of coke, and vote for Ronald Regan.
I hated this movie. It went nowhere, made no sense, and used cheap tactics of being seemingly scary. I can't believe I spent 3 dollars on it.
****SPOILER****
I didn't like it when Simon killed Julie. What a selfish bast@rd!!! lol. Now I have to watch a film where he gets butchered.
Yeah, i agree. I hated it too.
See ya' in the funny papers.
the only good part was the partial nude scene where julie is boinking him
i got to wonder though how many movie directors need to be in mental hospitals.
www.cruzan.info
Saw it On Demand as well. And, yup, it was not very good at all. To be fair, there were a couple of intersting visual elements but it mostly sucked and the ending was incomprehensible
shareI feel that way about Butterfly Effect 2 (what a load of dung), but this movie was great! The Ugly did require active thought processes and if you tune in to a horror movie just to see breasts...why not just watch the Playboy Channel.
Merry Christmas ya filthy animal.
Here is an idea why don't all you whiners quit and go and watch some American remake crap, which you all must seem to enjoy since you don't know what a good horror thriller is all about.
shareIts a thinking man's horror movie. A little bit more like a David Lynch flick. Once you get it. It works. Small hint: He was dyslecsic and remembering things.
shareA thinking man probably would have known how to spell dyslexic (which I get the feeling you don't know the meaning of either, since his trouble with reading isn't what made him a serial killer) and I'm pretty sure no one else needed to do any heavy thinking to grasp the concept of flashbacks in a movie.
shareAnd a better thinking man would get the joke.
share