MovieChat Forums > Savior (1998) Discussion > Beret's and hollywood, will they ever le...

Beret's and hollywood, will they ever learn how they are properly worn?


It's a great movie, but no soldier would walk around with his beret like Dennis Quaid does, he looks like a tool.

reply

[deleted]

i had no idea Savior is based on true story!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I could not disagree any more with your comment. Go and watch Shrek! GREAT movie and so is Warriors.

reply

[deleted]

Actually the beret is worn in tons of different ways across the world.

reply

I've seen this mentioned on several boards... but does it really matter?! You know he's supposed to be a soldier, and the behaviour of his character [presumably] rings true... It's just a minor costume detail; if you're a civilian and you're looking to empathise or learn from the themes of this movie, then it isn't likely to detract from the overall impact.

Maybe they'll get it right when you make a film... but then, maybe the writing wouldn't be so good... and, as someone who appreciates film, I'd rather the writing be top quality than the costumes be painstakingly accurate.

All things considered, it's not that wide of the mark.






Born when she kissed me, died when she left me, lived whilst she loved me

reply

I just tripped over this thread and am compelled to comment. Sure, it appears to be an insignificant wardrobe detail that should not matter...but it does. Sure I agree that the quality of writing, acting etc etc trump minor details, however, Hollywood consistently has a problem with presenting soldiers wearing berets.

Here's why such a seemingly picayune detail matters:

The beret is the one item of uniform that is impossible to make universally identical. In a military organization of uniformity, the beret becomes an expression of a soldier's personality and his attention to detail (as long as the basic guidelines for wearing them are followed - level, capbadge over left eye (right temple for the French), etc). Right or wrong, when a soldier in dress uniform approaches you notice a few things immediately: his bearing and apparent fitness, specialist skill badges (parachutist, Ranger Tab), medal ribbons (campaign medal? awards for valour?) and then how he wears his beret. If it's sloppy and worn wrong it can be a warning that he is a fake or just stopped caring. Shallow? Judging by appearance? Sure. And there are many soldiers I've known who don't look great on parade but who are excellent in the field. However, generally speaking, a soldier who takes pride in a professional appearance and attention to detail is usually better for it.

So why does this matter in the movies? Credibility. Something simple like a beret or the correct camo pattern on a uniform are very simple to do right. The second you see a screwed up beret in a military movie it is a warning that the film makers don't care enough about their project to get it right, they didn't hire a good military advisor or they arrogantly ignored him or they just don't care. Immediately, the whole film is suspect because of a minor, simple detail.

And it is so easy to get it right. Hire a military advisor who has actually worn a beret. He can teach the actors to wear them properly in a few minutes. Then the actors need to keep them with them, wet them and shape them over night. The easiest way to have them look good on set is to wear them damp.

As to Suzi's comment about how different people around the world wear berets differently, that is true. However, there is a big difference between wearing a beret "differently" and wearing it "wrong". The French wear theirs differently (badge over right temple, excess pulled to the left side). Check out pictures of modern Foreign Legion paratroopers - the berets are small, tight, well-shaped and plastered to their heads. If Quaid is supposed to be a former Legionaire, he'd likely wear his beret "Legion-style".

The problem is that a brand new beret (out of the package) is stiff wol and shaped like a frisbee. It needs to be shaped and formed when wet in order to look right. Lazy actors and costumers think they just throw it onto someone's head (like a ball cap) and it's good to go. It's not.

reply

Maybe they 'didn't care enough to get it right', because - as I pointed out - it doesn't affect the story, which is what should matter!

If your mistake can get past the average civilian (which I'm betting this would) then I'm afraid that it's inconsequential. If you want accuracy over and above the nuances of writing, then you can always watch a documentary.








"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

Perfectly explained, except for "badge over right temple, excess pulled to the left side" one corp wear the badge on the left, one of the two green beret in the French army (in remembrance to their roots).

Also to wear a green beret you have two school, the old school (ww2) and the Légion/commando-like.

Illustration, Grandfather and grandson with a green beret:
http://lignesdedefense.blogs.ouest-france.fr/media/02/00/1677312164.jpg

reply