Good grief, that's a bit harsh isn't it?
First off, WHAT was a bit harsh? Who are you chastizing?
Someone nasty got out of bed on the wrong side!
THAT's a bit harsh to me (the someone nasty) you dont' know us personally from a hole in the wall! Whoever said the "bit harsh" thing might even be your mother! (you're mother's not nasty--- is she?)
If you go back and read, the person (yes, a real person, try to remember that) was saying they actually liked the dress, but thought it was a bit "Trekky".
(I love this...) If YOU go back and read, you will see that the OP says the little trekky looking bit at the very end -- almost like a disclaimer -- and knocks it in all the lines above!
The first line says: really tacky sci-fi convention
Second line says: An electric blue metallic-material minidress with a silver 'Star Trek' style "delta shield" arrowhead on the bust.
Third line: She looked like an extra from one of the convention scenes in Galaxy Quest (yes I know that came out after this film, but it's still a valid comparison)!
Fourth line is the one saying that OP actually liked the dress, blah, blah, blah... a crock of shizzle! IF OP liked the dress he or she wouldn't have knocked it!
They are entitled to an opinion you know.
And apparently the rest of us aren't entitled to an opinion...
You're laborers, you're supposed to be laboring! That's what you get for not having an education!!
reply
share
k_street
15 years ago
I thought they looked kind of "spacy" somehow too, but cute.
reply
share
b_imdb-199
15 years ago
The shiny dresses were very on trend in the 90s, kitten heels too.
reply
share
sexyscissors
14 years ago
Umm ok....
[First off, WHAT was a bit harsh? Who are you chastizing? ]
I believe that the comment "So, who cares, did you have to wear that? NO! So who gives a crap! Sorry that something colorful bothers you so much. " was a little harsh. Basically implying that no-one is interested in her opinion (which is kind of redundant as this is a public message board where people can pretty much post whatever they want).
Also, this comment doesn't actually show that the poster has any understanding of the intention of the original poster.
If you actually read and understood the original post, they weren't complaining, just wondering if anyone thought the dresses looked like they were from "a tacky sci-fi convention."
Looking at the original post, i don't see any complaining, just a bunch of statements. They don't say anything explicitly about the dress being unattractive or unflattering or detrimental to the movie in some way.
[(I love this...) If YOU go back and read, you will see that the OP says the little trekky looking bit at the very end -- almost like a disclaimer -- and knocks it in all the lines above! ]
Well, if YOU go back and read it (again) you will notice that the only obviously negative thing that the OP says is the word "tacky." And so, just because the line at the end is "a little bit like a disclaimer" then it's automatically the OP back-tracking on their opinion? Hm, ok, i assume you know why i structure my posts the way i do also?
MAYBE, the OP wrote their post and thought "ooh, that sounds a little negative, i just want to clarify that i don't actually dislike the dress."
But what do i know? I guess i just take things at face value - first poster asks a legitimate question and second poster doesn't say anything constructive, misses the point of the original post and uses an unnecessarily aggressive tone.
reply
share