Bridgette Wilson bare breast (or a trick of the light?)

It cannot be, for it would be a monumental colossal goof. Yet, in the scene with the male model, Bridgette (as Sahara) is seen taking her top off. Her back is bare, no lingerie strap. Then, her body is shielded by her Latin lover, and we see lacy bra top peeking through. Okay, this is perhaps still correct, she could have put it on. But then there is a flash, very short, hey, bare breast now, nipple, there it is, aureola, whee!

(Before the administrators delete me, just be advised, this does come to a point, pun not intended)

Immediately afterwards, similar flash, no, she is wearing bra, skimpy, lacy, but definitely she is covered. Hell, but I saw what I saw.

The glory of DVD: I went back. I freeze-framed. I zoomed in. Yeah! People, I know about "a trick of the light" and "diaphanous" and "garment malfunctions" but that one, I would call it a bare breast.

Sorry if the administrators don't like my post, but my point is THAT THE SCENE IS A GOOF. Clothing don't just disappear. Unless it WAS a trick of the light. Granted, could have been. So, I am not posting it as a goof. Can anybody else cast some light on the, er, juicy subject? :)