MovieChat Forums > Picture Perfect (1997) Discussion > Was it necessary to show her bra in EVER...

Was it necessary to show her bra in EVERY outfit?

posted 12 years ago by jonieblon
6 replies | jump to latest

I mean..it was so just THERE..every top she has..its like she forgets to button the top button..

and her wardrobe..egads..the wedding getup? what in GD outfit is that? dual pattern sundress...puke-green tights with clunky shoes.

And the Non-dress she wears to the launch party? And it's not bcz this is an old movie..i remember watching the movie and thinking...that is one butt ugly dress..and her Hairdo in that dress...

Not sure who did wardrobe on this..but obviously worships at the feet of Patricia Fields..the wacko who dresses Carrie Bradshaw in her ridiculous outfits.

You pipple mek my ass twitch

[–] Zuider_Zee 12 years ago

Aniston cannot act so they do what they can in order to sell tickets.

[–] biggacy4 9 years ago

yes necessary

[–] MissEFierro 9 years ago

Most of her dresses looked like lingerie. And her boobs were hanging out of all of them. It was distracting.

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] mandycw 7 years ago

was she actually wearing a bra in those dresses? I kept thinking she needed a bra. Or at least the tape that hold the boobs in place more firmly.

There was also a scene early in the movie where she is walking quickly along the sidewalk. He nipples are all out there and swinging. There is no way she had a bra on.

Clunky shoes were in style at that time. I don't know anyone who wore the rest of that outfit, though.

[–] dgates64 7 years ago

No one is ruder about a women's appearance than other women. Jennifer Aniston's worst day blows every one of you away on your best day. So suck it you jealous b*tches.