MovieChat Forums > The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) Discussion > There was no point to the daughter chara...

There was no point to the daughter character


Seriously, why was she needed other than to give Malcolm another person to fret about?

reply

Overall I think the character of Kelly was put into this movie basically just for character development.
In the first film we learn that Ian Malcolm has kids but we never see them or really even find out anything about them. This movie tries to go a little deeper into Ian Malcolm's character development and shows how he behaves as a father and also provides a bit of back story into what happened between Ian and Kelly's mother (Ian mentions she took off to Paris).

So as a whole, Kelly is basically just there to build on Ian Malcolm's character profile.

reply

Perhaps but the character added no real value to the overall story. They tried to make her appear handy in the scene where she performed her gymnast routine but even that came across as pretentious.

reply

Yeah that scene was pathetic really. The only purpose of that scene was just to give kelly "her moment to shine"

reply

There definitely was a point. Sarah speaks early on about the theory of Robert Burke who says that the trex would abandon its young at an early age, which she intends to disprove. The trex - infant relationship directly mirrors Malcolms relationship with his daughter, perhaps as a narrative tool, to show Ian's development as the importance of his daughter becomes a lot clearer as she's put into such a dangerous situation.

reply

I actually never thought of the T-Rex relationship to be a reflection of Ian and Kelly. you raise a good point... Spielberg may very well have used that as a tool to help the audience root for Kelly a bit more (it was obvious she was going to survive) but still, Spielberg has his ways

reply

The themes of abandonment I noticed were present in Malcolm and Kelly's relationship early on, as he mentions how his presumably ex-wife "dumped her, and split for Paris" at the beginning. It's also clear that Ian isn't around much as a father. I think that he(Spielberg) attempts to mirror the two parent-child relationships, which I feel also further enhances the notion that the dinosaurs are animals(like us, who care for our young) that must be respected/not interfered with, which of course Hammond explains in the end. I don't know how much sense that makes but that's just my two cents.

reply

Funny I saw this movie back on opening weekend and no one complained about this character. They cheered for her actually.

Cut to many years later the internet won't stop whining about her. She was far less annoying than the first 2 kids. Funny how no one calls them pretentious when they were the very definition.

The elephant in the room is rather large and pretentious as well. You really can't skate around it.

reply

Wait, are you referring to me as the elephant in the room?

Also it must have been amazing seeing TLW in theaters.

reply

...Why would I be calling you the elephant in the room?

It was amazing honestly.

reply

Just forget that. How was seeing the Trailer scene and how did the crowd react to it? I wish I could have been old enough to see it, I only caught JP3 in theatres.

reply

I think the two kids from the first film were far more annoying than Kelly also I agree with you 100%... the kids from the first film were nothing but a pain in the A** for the adults but Kelly was just a poor lonely girl just longing for love and attention from her father. She snuck on board the trailer so she could give herself more time to spend with Ian I think.

reply

I thought the girl was well played though and it gave Malcolm's character a different and more caring feel to the first film, which changed things up a bit.

reply

Other than the fact that the kid was in the book (I think), Spielberg loves to put kids in peril in movies, to tug at the audience heartstrings. Although he does it so often it really feels like this is a personal fear of his. Jaws, E.T., Jurassic Park, Empire Of The Sun, even A.I. (even though it's a robot child), and this one. Notice that he only alludes to a child being seriously injured, like the little girl in Lost World who is fine according to later report, although at first you think she was killed and eaten. His child serious injuries and deaths both occur in his later movies, BEFORE the film starts, like in The Minority Report or A.I., where the kid is in what seems to be a coma from a serious accident of sorts. My guess is that he has some dead fear of failing as a Dad and losing a child due to his own negligence.

There may be some child deaths in Jaws, but this was before he had children. He has even stated that he would change the ending to Close Encounters Of The Third Kind as he could never imagine abandoning his kids like that, since he became a father after that movie was made.

reply

I remember someone pointing out that in every Jurassic movie there are kids whose parents are going through or been through a divorce. I don't remember if that was brought up in the first movie but in 2-4 they're pretty apparent. The theme of families coming together always shows up at the end of these movies.

reply

She was there strictly for kid appeal.

reply