MovieChat Forums > Lolita (1998) Discussion > Nathalie Portman was offered this role

Nathalie Portman was offered this role


She turned it down because, as she later explained, her parents didn't want her first kiss to be with Jeremy Irons. I'm sure HE took the role though because he really WANTED to make out with a 15-year-old--it's called ACTING, you little jerk. Obviously, Portman has always been a classless a**hole who has no compunction insulting her fellow actors or roles she turned down, but she is a little more talented (and even prettier) than Dominique Swain. She still wouldn't have fit this role very well. HOWEVER. . .

She probably came close to looking like the "Lolita" of the beginning of the novel a few years earlier when she was in "Leon". A more sexualized version of that though would have been pretty creepy (although even as it was, I don't know why her parents found the "Leon" role totally acceptable, but didn't want her playing "Lolita" a couple years later). And unless they started filming the movie at the time of "Leon" and spent 4-5 years making it, she wouldn't have been believable as the older "Lolita" at the end.

On the other hand, if you want to imagine a sexy version of "Lolita". Tuesday Weld was apparently offered the Sue Lyon role (she would have been a little older than Sue Lyon--16 or 17 time). She turned the role down, she claimed, because she had already been Lolita in real life!



"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"

reply

She turned it down because, as she later explained, her parents didn't want her first kiss to be with Jeremy Irons.



Hmm, interesting. I did not know that. Maybe because Irons is a heavy smoker...? 

Anyway, I can definitely see Portman as on-screen Lolita, but on the other hand Dominique Swain really made the part her own and I'm absolutely convinced that - if there was no controversy around the movie - she would've been nominated for an Oscar. Just think about the scene "Murder me like you murdered my mother!!!!". That scene alone is enough for an Oscar nod for Swaine.

I mean, these days they nominate young actresses left and right. That Jennifer Lawrence chick has like, what, two Oscars already?

It's a shame, really. Shame that Lolita 1997 was ignored by the industry. It's such an incredibly well-made movie. In every aspect. It's a perfect Oscar candidate.

Alas, people were too busy talking about how wrong it is for this kind of movie to be made. Stupid, stupid...


==============================
"You don't watch Michael Bay films. They happen to you."

reply

Agreed. Dominique Swain should've gone on to become a major name after this. It's a real shame she didn't. Such a talent.

reply

HAVE YOU SEEN HER LATTER DAY WORK...WHATEVER TALENT SHE HAD,IT EVAPORATED LONG AGO...


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8760550/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_17
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6236780/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_21
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7153134/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_16

SHE HAS MADE NO LESS THAN 35 FILMS IN THE LAST TEN YEARS...ALL TURDS,ANCHORED BY HER ATROCIOUS ACTING...

reply

Yeah, I saw a couple, and I agree with you. Obviously she lost motivation after things didn't work out. Sad!

reply

Talents doesn't = great roles.

Look at the amount of people who have no talent at all and have starred in big budget films.


Lolita did a lot of harm to her and people even today still remember for it.

You know nothing about her so how do you know she has not turned down big role or long term ones.

So people want in and out jobs or take jobs because of people they know on it so they would rather be on friendly set having fun.

To be a movie star is a lifestyle which many struggle with and you need to only focus on this that is not for every one (some people just want to act or do it for pay day as well)

reply

I KNOW ENOUGH...AS A MOVIE BUFF AND ONE TIME FAN OF HERS...I HAVE SAT THROUGH DOZENS OF TERRIBLE FILMS THAT SHE IS EITHER IN OR STARRING IN...SHE PUTS IN NO EFFORT AT ALL THESE DAYS.

reply