MovieChat Forums > Heavy Metal 2000 (2000) Discussion > Maybe just the second time...

Maybe just the second time...


So I saw it back in 2000 when it came out and was quick to forget it. Then, just this morning, I walk into my friend's room and he is watching some animated movie. HA!
"Is that the new Heavy Metal?"
"Yeah."
"I haven't seen this in seven years, I remember the first one was a lot better though."

An hour later I was watching the ridiculous lizard tribal combat scene like a riveted five-year-old watches ice-cream melt on a warm, summer afternoon. Wait a minute? This movie sucked when I saw it in 2000. How is it good now?

All I did was turn up the volume and smoke a bowl. Made the story intensely involving and even, dare I say, enjoyable. I am not a fan of the magazine or much a fan of Metal, but I love movies and consider myself a snob about most. Being that most people found the movie a horror of modern cinema (much as I recall my own distaste for the film for seven years,) I was wondering why I found it entertaining instead of painful or laughable. How much the smoke helped is debatable, but the volume being very loud allowed me to engage entirely with the film.

Ironside was perfect for Tyler and Julie was a strong character backed by all the typical story elements that keep me busy with new scenes and ideas. The film seemed to got through stages of evolution and then devolved into barren landscapes and primal life. From the drudgery of the space-port bar shootout to the hyperspace catastrophe and the aforementioned lizard tribe and subsequent events around the "waters of immortality" (which included the worst cgi'ed bad guy ever). I was absolutely engaged.

Sorry if you don't agree. I wouldn't want you to think I was trying to say it is a good movie, just that with certain 'additions' and lower expectations you might get more out of it.

reply

I guess that happens at times. Some times I love movies when they first come out and with more viewings, they totally suck and then vice versa. Or some times I'll watch a film and it is good at times and then bad at times. Kind of weird.

But I do agree that it was all right overall and did have a few good points, but overall sucked. Julie was pretty much just a rip-off of a character from the last story in the original, but with an annoying attitude that was a real turn-off for me. Michael Ironside did a good voice for Tyler, but he again seemed to similar to the villain in the final story of the original as well.

It could have been so much more in my opinion. Like I have said to many, I personally saw it as the maker just trying to show off his wife.

reply

You basically had the same experience I did. I expected to hate it, but my friend had only just recently seen the first one and was hell-bent on watching this one(which universally is kind of hated) and I smoked right before watching and thought it was awesome! I couldn't stop watching it and I loved Tyler as a bad guy and I loved the gore and voice-work and adult elements in the cartoon format.

I guess I kind of disagree a little bit since I personally do think it was a good movie.



DID YOUR ASS GET ENOUGH WINGS?!

reply