MovieChat Forums > Le dîner de cons (1998) Discussion > Just saw the trailer for the American re...

Just saw the trailer for the American remake.


It's pretty high on my must-not-see list.

reply

Want to smash my head in to forget I sat through that trailer.

Signa...? No, we use Chip and PIN now.

reply

Yeah, it's so weird because just last week we watched the original movie in French class, and then today I see the trailer advertised.... It doesn't look nearly as funny. I love Steve Carell, but this new movie just seems sort of lame.

reply

Agreed. After seeing it, I'd go as far as to say that Hollywood deserves to be stricken from the map by the Big One. Such a travesty...

reply

Hey if you need anything in French just let me know I'll be happy to help. I'm french myself.

regarding the american remake, obviously it won't be as good as the original but american people can't help themselves they have to remake everything. They even thought about remaking oldboy. How could they even do better...
It's the same thing here it's only funny because it's in french.
Some jokes are unique to the movie like "elle est bretonne" joke or the one with 'sa soeur'. Anyway it will be shamefull, can still be enjoyable.

reply

Hey, just to let you know they actually remade oldboy masterpiece !
The Park Chan Wook adaptation is one of my favorite movie… but I believe Spike Lee can deliver a good adaptation of OldBoy as well… Let's wait and see

reply

I think they took the general idea and ran in a different direction. I love the original (so many great French films that can't really be brought in as American remakes) but I think American audiences wouldn't want a film with two funny guys in an apartment for the whole film.

reply

I saw the original in my Film Study class during my Senior Year of High School, loved it. The new one doesn't look good at all.

---
http://card.mygamercard.net/joecb1991.png

reply

Actually I like that Hollywood finds good films for me. I had never heard of this film until they made the stupid version. So, thank you Hollywood!

reply

Are you freaking kidding me? You guys act like the remake is the worst film ever created when it got decent reviews! Holy hell, people like to exaggerate every bit of things.

reply

Perhaps you need to read a little better. First of all, most of us are only saying the French version is better, not that the American film is "the worst... ever created" - those are your words and not the words from people here.

Secondly, you said it "got decent reviews". On Metacritic, it got 57 from 100 points. I don't think that is very good. Do you? And further, how many French critics reviewed the American version (on Metacritic, not one)? All the critics there are American and they gave it 57 from 100. As I said, perhaps you need to read a little more carefully before you start complaining.

reply

57 is good. 57 is in the yellow zone. It's not in the red zone. 57 is almost in the green zone, which starts a 60. Therefore, 57 is decent, unless you have some unreasonably high standards for the film. Rarely any film on Metacritic reaches in the green zone unless it's a really, really, really good movie. And no, I never said you guys said it was the worst movie ever. I said you guys act like it's the worst movie ever. There's a difference.

reply

57 may be "good" to you, however Metacritic describes it as "mixed or average reviews". You don't see any difference between "average" and "good"? Secondly, here at Imdb, the users give the French film 7.7 rating and the American film a 6.4 rating. We said the French film was better and the users here obviously agree with us. We neither said it was the worst film ever, nor "acted" like it was the worst film ever. You seem to look at facts and reinterpret them according to your own opinion. I believe that's called "bias."

reply

The typical American knee-jerk reaction is to get all defensive whenever someone praises another country's work or, heaven help us, compares it to ours. We just gotta live with it.

I was appalled to see "At the Movies" reviewing the American remake. Reviewer #1, who loved it, never even mentioned that it came from a hit French play & film in the 90s. When reviewer #2 mentioned that he enjoyed the original version more, reviewer #1 got all angry, called him a "snob" and wouldn't let him get a word in edgewise. Welcome to America.

But I totally agree with what you said earlier, it's great when Hollywood remakes the foreign classics because we might not have heard of them otherwise. Also the original versions usually get remastered & re-released on DVD & Blu-ray which is what I'm waiting for.

reply

I saw both versions. I think the French version was better but not by much.

reply

I saw the American remake last year, and thought it had its funny moments, but wasn't that great (and I absolutely love Paul Rudd). Just watched the original yesterday, and absolutely loved it. I do find it funny that in the original, they never actually make it to the dinner. Again though, French humor is much different than American humor. I thought watching Pierre and François was hilarious, but I can see how most simple-minded Americans would prefer to watch the "slapstick" comedy in the remake.

reply

I need to make note of this, they never actually make it to the dinner in the original 1998 French version.

Now ask me how I really feel, I'm just here for the comments.

reply

I agree, I don't really want to see it.
I think I annoyed a few people in the cinema when,
during the trailer, I yelled (in shock)
"But that was originally a French film, Le Diner de Cons!"
...
Niz xxx

reply

In all honesty, they should've cast Danny Devito. That's all I could think of when I watched this version.

The payoff for slogging through an hour of boring is never worth it.

reply

I agree with you. Think DeVito would have been better casting. No way though did this compare to the original french version which was so much better.

reply

[deleted]