MovieChat Forums > The Castle (1999) Discussion > Tell Them They're Dreaming - They Should...

Tell Them They're Dreaming - They Should've Lost Their Home


On several viewings of this film changed my mind completely.

I have no sympathy for this ignorant and naïve family.

reply

I don't like your opinion but you sound like a disrespectful, ignorant individual and I think you should respect how the movie has a connection with their home and how they love it and care for it.

Saying they should have lost their home is like saying you should live under a rock.

reply

I used to have sympathy for the Kerrigan’s plight. But after multiple viewings the humour and irony loses it effect and as a consequence the family are portrayed as naïve idiots who should know better.

Here are 4 reasons why the family should lose their house:

Sitch and co depict Daryl as an idiot. Of course land values at Coolaroo are not increasing. They live next to an airport with the runway a stone’s throw from their fence. There are huge electrical pylons adjacent to their property. The backyard is mostly landfill and the soil contains traces of lead. We may laugh at Daryl’s misplaced over capitalising but he is stupid to think that his property is of any value. Consider the evaluations he provides to items he finds on the trading post. He knows the true value of jousting sticks or an OH projector yet can’t see the true worth of his property. He also doesn’t have the foresight to see that living next to an industrial hub may have future consequences.

Daryl is portrayed as an Aussie battler yet he displays a wealth that most people would envy. He has several cars, a tow truck, a boat, and even a holiday house. Though we never see him work we do see him purchase an eclectic range of trading post goods. He claims “money can’t buy what I’ve got” but he still flaunts his assets to others in the neighbourhood. Whether it’s a fake chimney or a radar detector or a Holden Commodore, Daryl is a cashed-up self-employed individual who places value on his commodities. He is so blinded by what he owns that he can’t see that his home is just another possession.

The holiday house in Bonnie Doon is Daryl’s home away from home. Here he still acts as the patriarch instilling his virtues to his family. This proves that his concept of home can easily be transported to different locations. His heavily laden sentimentality on his Coolaroo property is just as misplaced as the praise he gives to any number of his wife’s artistic endeavours. If he can enjoy the serenity at Bonnie Doon and how the place brings family together why can’t this be created somewhere else?

Finally, Daryl declaring “I’m really starting to understand how the aborigines feel” is truly offensive. The colonisation of Australia subsequently removed aborigines from their land. For Daryl to say “This country’s got to stop stealing other people’s land” is right but it doesn’t apply to him. Daryl’s government were happy to purchase his property with an amount that was worth a lot more than the true value of his home. Sadly, Indigenous Australians were not as fortunate.

reply

The cars the Kerrigans owned would have had a total value of a few thousand dollars, with the possible exception of the tow truck which was Darryl's work vehicle. Nearly everything they owned was bought as a bargain through the Trading Post, a paper that advertised cheap used goods.

reply

It comes down to one of Australia's core values that helped shape it's cultural identity: 'a fair go'. Taking away a man's dream- every Australian's dream of owning a three quarter acre block- his 'castle', for the sake of big business is the antithesis of a fair go. That's why they argue the line in the constitution 'on just terms'. Its legalese for a fair go. It's also a David versus Goliath situation and again supports key Australian values of a healthy disrespect for authority and an egalitarian society. To support the government's stance of compulsory acquirement goes against these values.

It's a shame you want to spit on a family who embody the country's core values because you feel they're not smart enough for your intellect.

reply

The constitutional ‘fair go’ is interesting as Daryl clearly breaks this principle. He flaunts council regulations with extensions to his house. Though he initially condemns his son’s aggression with a rifle, Daryl condones the assault just because of the weapon’s purchase price. Daryl also willfully vandalises property. He steals the expensive gate and later appropriates the stolen item as a prominent fixture to his own house.

If Daryl truly believes in ‘fair go’ he definitely doesn’t show it with his unlawful acts.

“It's a shame you want to spit on a family who embody the country's core values because you feel they're not smart enough for your intellect”

Geez, is this patronizing tone the way you respond to your teenage students when one of them disagrees with your point of view? Tsk tsk tsk.

reply

None of what you said actually constitutes a fair go. They were harassed and menaced into standing up for themselves. When they took that gate it was symbolic. They were sending a message that they weren't going to be intimidated and bullied. It also shows bravery in the face of adversity- something that's celebrated every ANZAC day, yet you see it as a shameful trait? As for renovating their home to their liking, that demonstrates another key cultural value: ingenuity. You seem to be very out of touch with cultural values.

Sorry if you found it patronising, but I'm not going to dumb myself down so you feel less threatened. You've clearly missed the point of this film. You're the worst kind of troll: someone who tries to use "big words" and dresses up an argument as a supposedly 'thoughtful' discussion. You're not interested in hearing other's ideas, this thread is just you wanting to bait people. Your picture says it all- just a sad clown. Won't be responding further.

reply

FFS it’s only a movie yet your response demonstrates that it is you who are threatened by challenging ideas. Ironic that by stating "won't be responding further' actually proves that you're the one who is "not interested in hearing other's ideas".

Just because someone dislikes your favourite film doesn’t make him/her a troll, especially considering the supportive evidence used to substantiate the argument. I accept that you and others don’t agree with my ideas but labelling me a troll is not justified.

If you are a teacher, which I assume you are judging by the films you comment on and that these posts occur during the holidays when you have the time, then I’m saddened. If you can’t acknowledge that there are viewpoints that oppose your core values then how are you educating students to be free thinkers?

reply

Australians are free to believe anything Rupert Murdoch's rags tell them to believe.

reply

Your picture says it all- just a sad clown.
Yep! As Darryl would say, "He's trollin'"!🐭

reply

Before you all go crying because I've besmirched a film you presumably hold dear, let me ask you this: Are you laughing with or at the Kerrigans?

reply

This is the point in a nutshell! I've never been as enamoured of this film as many of my friends seem to be. Sure, it had some really funny lines. But to me, it always had a superior, condescending air. We were definitely meant to be laughing at them!

108 193 23 8114 246* 47.73 22 42

reply

I am inclined to agree with you up to a point. I have felt less sorry for the Kerrigans after many viewings of this film.

I just saw it recently and was astounded that I have always missed the part where they have lived there for only 15 years. It they had lived there a lot longer, I can understand.

Darryl wants to be protected by the constitution, but was happy to flaunt the law himself.

I still like the film and it is only a comedy, and I guess any other outcome would wreak the film.

reply