MovieChat Forums > The Brave (1997) Discussion > Is this well directed by Johnny Depp?

Is this well directed by Johnny Depp?


I read a review recently that criticised this film as being narcississtic, because Johnny chose to include many shots lingering on his own face and body. Well frankly that is fine by me because he looks fantastic in this film, but I suppose that is a justifiable criticism. He does go around with his shirt open quite a lot of the time and there are many close-ups of his face. But he has always said that he doesn't like watching himself on screen so why would be choose such shots? Personally I think this is a beautiful film and Johnny's direction is excellent, particularly in the closing scene which had me with my heart in my mouth.

By the way, does anyone else agree that this has one of the most beautiful love scenes of any Johnny Depp film?

reply

I don't see how anyone could call Johnny Depp narcisstic, after he's tried so hard to rid himslef of his sex-symbol status. Hahaha...

reply

Yes, I do. Thank you for asking that question, I thought I was the only one who noticed!

reply

But in most of the scenes with Brandon it's pretty clear that Johnny was mainly concerned with capturing Brandon. And to be honest were there any other actors in the movie to capture other than him and Brandon.

reply

I hadn't heard that criticism before! I've heard it described badly directed because of the pacing but not for being narcissistic.

Not too sure about the open shirt, but facial close-ups are usually used by directors for intimacy with the character. If they're filming an emotional scene, most of it will be close-ups of the actors faces because that's where they show most of their emotion. Just like action sequences are shot from a distance to see whats going on. Its all just technique.

He has said that in the end, he couldn't watch himself in it so he left it up to the rest of the crew to watch the dailies so maybe that was part of it?

reply

I agree with PeachyP, I think the close ups etc would have been used not for narcissism but to show character emotions, intimacy, and to help the viewers sympathy to lie with his character.

He's not stupid, he knows the world of film and film techniques well, and everything in films is done for a reason.

reply

yes, the majority of the story was told by his facial expressions & gestures.

reply

its exremley well directed by johnny, and not narcassistic at all, its a really great movie, it should never be critisized.

reply

[deleted]


guys... come on? its freakin' Johnny Depp! the Dead Man! the Don Juan DeMarco! the Ed Wood! The Pirate! The Libertine! The scissorshands Man! One of the most versatile Actors (As well As Gary Oldman)of our time, if not the most! narcissistic? HA! what a joke.

I wish more people knew about this film, knew about Johnny's earlier work BEFORE pirates. i guess that's because of the fact he didn't let it release here... sucks...

"Too bad about River Phoenix... he was great, but he would have been one of the best if he'd lived"

reply

[deleted]

grraston, johnny killed river phoenix!!

Man, this film was SSSLLLOOOWWWWWWWWWW due to a BBBBOORRRRIINNNGG SCRIPT... with EXTREMELY MESSY DIRECTING...

Eg.

When Johnny's character, is it Raphael or something, is walking with his son somewhere (bus stop?)
Johnny's head and neck keep going off and on camera like they were filming it on a raft in stormy seas or summin'... F-IN' HELL, JOHNNY!!!! Its simple: KEEP ACTORS HEAD IN FRAME (unless necessary not to)... c'mon, lil more effort please.

I was fed up by the end of this film, no actually, i was fed up about 10 seconds into this film, but the ending shot was HORRIBLE and stayed with me all sodding night... URGH.. what happened to the typical 'hero escapes and lives happily ever after' scenario?!??!?!?! If there is one thing good about this film is that its f-in' miserable... and possibly terribly unrealistic; why would you knowingly go to your own death without any promise you'd get the cash reward for your family?! DUH!! Bit suicidal, me thinks... or just desperate, so a gamble.

Theres also these RRRREEEAAAALLYYY long shots eg. at that party and the camera just rolls across everyone, INCLUDING Johnny... you're supposed to roll across THEN stop and focus on the main one and then they're supposed to do something fitting to the story... not just glide passed them like they're and extra or '''supporting artist''' or whateva.

I understand his feelings, but he should have released this inda US... sure, it would be humiliating, but he's, seemingly, the kinda guy who doesn't give a sh*t if you like him or not... AAAANNNDDDD, wot about the actors and everyone involved?! He deprived the humiliation for them or just made it worse by chickening out AAANNNDDDD directors put their reputations on the line everytime they make a film, like actors, producers, writers and everyone else recognised; he took this film on, it should really have been his obligation to follow it through.... but maybe, if i was him, i'd'a scrapped everything but the last shot and released that... well, if i was him, i'd have chickened out, so that doesn't make any sense.

I hope he directs another film soon, maybe this time going the full way ie. not cutting corners...

Johnny, GET A GRIP and a PLAUSIBLE SCRIPT and possibly John Williams for the score and you'll be onto a winner!

reply

You said it, vanessa. This film was meaningless tedium and looked more cheap and lazy than Paris Hilton. Just goes to show that if you give Depp money and let him do his own thing he'll f-ck it up. He needs Tim Burton to hold his hand or a reference point for his performance. No wonder he had to start doing commercial films, because this movie represented what was happening in this phase of his career i.e. weak and going nowhere.

reply

haha, more cheap and lazy than paris hilton! yep! I just don't think he really knew what he was doing... hence the cut corners and bad script - but he's been in enough films since to have learnt something from his own past bad experience (i hope)... he may have been thinking alot of tim burton when he was directing, and this would have certainly altered his ability to judge things with initiative and whateva, but possibly not...

weak and going nowhere, yeah... he has mentioned that his life never really had any meaning until he had his first child, that was post the brave, wasn't it? maybe it was like a mid-life crisis type thing as he desperately tried to give justification for his life...

reply

The guy is not a good director and no one said he is but he is one hell of an actor who can hold himself up with any director. And why people seem to forget that after Pirates he made movies that were far from commercial like Finding Neverland, Sweeny Todd and THE LIBERTINE (FAR FAR FAR FROM COMMERCIAL)

reply

He needs Tim Burton to hold his hand or a reference point for his performance.

needs TB? loool! some of his very best performances weren't directed by tim.
No wonder he had to start doing commercial films

he started doing these family movies so that his kids can watch them.
this movie represented what was happening in this phase of his career i.e. weak and going nowhere.

he did masterpeices like Donnie Brasco,Fear and Loathing in LA,Sleepy Hollow,etc in this 'weak and going nowhere' phase of his career.


"The hardest thing in this world is to live in it."

reply

Okay, I've figured you out - but I'll rant anyway:

Firstly, Johnny Depp did not "kill" River Phoenix, although this is irrelevant. Phoenix OD'd. The fact that he did it outside the Viper Room has nothing to do with Johnny, wouldn't you agree?

Stop critisizing camera angles. Seriously. If you can do better, DO IT. Seeing as you can't remember the character's name, the locations or anything at all, you obviously didn't try very hard to watch, did you? You probably just got out the popcorn and realized you couldn't eat it because you had to *think* and then decided you'll hate the film.

I don't know if this is one really really big joke, and if you're just laughing at us all, but frankly: "hero escapes and lives happily ever after"? What movies have you been watching - 40 Year Old Virgin? You obviously have completely missed the point of the film, because he got the money *before* coming back to be killed. That's how he managed to buy the toys, the TV, the food. They don't just grow on trees. Really. And wow, he's desperate? How could I not realize?! *please note sarcasm*.

You understand his feelings as to not releasing the film?! He didn't realease it because of people like you - sadly, much older people and people with shiny cards with their names on it. And there, you just admitted personally to being a hypocrite. I'm very happy for you.

And finally: John Williams for the score? Would you possibly like a flying bicycle in there somewhere as well?

reply


well damn, i'm glad somebody said it!! completely well said prettyMaryk

I mean, seriously, there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this film. John did excellent work like he always have, his directing only helped. i mean, what's so "sloppy" about it? Everything's turns out in perfect shape. people hating on this film must always be into the fast-paced, the action and don't want to take it slower and focus on real emotion Depp delivers here. More people could obviously relate to Raphael before Jack Sparrow. (Another great character though no doubt)

Man... its just gets on my nerves sometimes, even though it really shouldn't since opinions on films vary, but this film gets dissed for no reason. people really are missing the point I guess. also must add I see no problem with the camera work of this film- it hits him from a distance to capture that soul-lous wandering quality, close ups on the face to really feel the emotions in their eyes- the filming of it is all good in general, I just wish that Greg Mcdonald had made a sequel (at least for ralph's kids ) or JD made another one.

in closing, true JD fans, when ya watch one of his movies, (particularly of the early and mid 90s) don't always expect something extremely fast-paced or something that will blow your mind with graphics, sometimes its about character study. For those emotional aspects that relate to us. (a fact that goes along with The Brave, What's eating Gilbert Grape, Dead Man and others)

McCarthy: the final measure of bravery is to stand up aganist death.

reply

I don't think it was well directed (and it pains me to say it) but it is a wonderful film, nonetheless. The acting by everyone is superb, and though the editing and direction is a little creaky, it is still a film that moves me to tears no matter how often I watch it.

Wonderful - I would recommend it to anyone, but it will mean more to someone who is used to watching films based on character and quality rather than shoot-outs and CGI.

reply

[deleted]

"it should never be critisized". Are you on the right pills today?





“That may be true, but it is also irrelevant.”

reply

expertise is an illusion.

reply

Johnny Depp is definitely NOT narcissistic!

Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?

reply

i heard something about depp always wanting to be a porn star, not an actor, so if thats true it might help explain the lingering shots of his body...havent seen this so cant really say.

--

"hey look, two women *beep* a polar bear!"

my bloody valentine's loveless = pure bliss.

reply

where the hell did you hear that? he wanted to be a musician and not a porn star.




"The hardest thing in this world is to live in it."

reply

Absurd to say it's narcissistic. He's the lead. He's going to be on screen. And he did director it very well - and should direct more.

difficult difficult lemon difficult.

reply