MovieChat Forums > The Big Lebowski (1998) Discussion > How well do you think The Big Lebowski h...

How well do you think The Big Lebowski has aged?


I'm not here to say The Big Lebowski is overrated. Far from it--I loved this movie in high school in the early 2000s (it was easily one of the most quoted films in my group of friends) and I still do today. But upon recently revisiting the film, I got to asking myself how well The Big Lebowski has aged--and if the answer is not so well, whether that could explain why many younger viewers of the film find it overrated or underwhelming.

A few quick observations/thoughts. The performances and many of the lines will always be brilliant, especially John Goodman's. Interestingly, there aren't a whole of lot of cultural and/or time references (OK, perhaps Tara Ried as the "it" girl of that time and the old cell phone, among a few others) which would make the film feel dated. But nevertheless, I couldn't help thinking on my most recent viewing that the film feels quite of its own time. The 90s were mostly a boom time in the US: lots of people getting very rich off the stock market, relative peace after the Gulf War in the early part of the decade. Young people often felt disconnected or disenfranchised from this system. Hence the appeal of the anti-heroes of the Dude and Walt. Back then, these characters were refreshing, even appealing, in their non-conformity to the capitalistic values of the US. Whereas today--where even as a contrarian or hipster, you still subscribe to the corporate ethos of our Gods of Apple and Google--they would be labeled as awkward, strange, pathetic. Although we celebrate diversity more than ever now, when it comes to diversity of character of personality, we're actually more similar to each other than ever before.

So what do you think? Is Lebowski a relic of its time or still relevant today?

reply

Laziness is a timeless quality that will never become thoroughly extinct. Even in less prosperous times as these.

Life is always intense for a repo man.

reply

"Cool" is always cool. Like how a pair of jeans and t-shirt will never go out of style. Or pizza.

Or my isn't name...

reply

watching it for the first time in 2016 and i have no idea why it is rated that high. 82 minute into the film and here i am trying to read on IMDB what's so special about it.

Behind every fortune... is a crime!

reply

I watched for the first time 6/6/16. I am a baby boomer and I thought the film was absolutely hilarious. I haven't laughed so hard since I watched "Brides Maids". I could see that millennials may not find it funny and think that it hasn't aged well, but for me watching this movie 18 years after its release it is tremendously entertaining and I can't wait to watch it again.

It is probably a generational thing.

reply

I've talked to many young folks who love this movie. I think the really smart kids these days don't spend so much time on the Internet and, as a result, we don't get a fair view of the young generation.

reply

Great comment.

reply

Subtlety is quickly becoming extinct in the 21st century.


Life is always intense for a repo man.

reply

watching it for the first time in 2016 and i have no idea why it is rated that high. 82 minute into the film and here i am trying to read on IMDB what's so special about it.


Because it's not the type of movie you "watch" while you're on your smartphone, fishing for social media likes and reading Buzzfeed.

reply

This is a very spiteful response. There is no reason to get offended because a person didn't enjoy the same movie as you. I watched The Big Lebowski without using my phone, browsing Buzzfeed etc. and still did not like it. There were some comical moments sure but overall this film was not fun to watch.

It seems like the kind of film that people who were teenagers in the 90s would have enjoyed (this is just me sharing an observation, I'm not trying to diss the film when I say this) but I don't feel most people I know would find it enjoyable or original nowadays.

reply

but I don't feel most people I know would find it enjoyable or original nowadays.

of course theyd find it original - theyd be all like "Hey , this film has no superheroes in it! how original!"

reply

At no point did i say that i watched it while being on my phone. I watched it for 82 minutes and then picked up my phone saying to WTF to myself. Chill and learn to take differences in opinions.

Behind every fortune... is a crime!

reply

Well, the movie was mildly received by the critics when it went out, too.

Like many cult movies, the Big Lebowski needs to be seen more than once to fully appreciate its qualities.

reply

I have to sadly agree. I saw it when it came out and thought it was OK.
Then I saw it probably 10 years ago, and I liked it a bit better.
I just saw it a couple of days ago and I must say I didn't enjoy it very much anymore.
It's back to being OK.
Some Coen Brothers movies hold up. This one doesn't for me.
I doubt I'll watch it again.

reply

Good question, WJ. Just watched it last night for the first time since it first came out. To me, it was of a style that was popular then, but seems a bit twee now. Many of the lines and scenes remain hilarious, but I think the style of humor has changed. Same for "Raising Arizona" another Coen masterpiece. But Fargo and Barton Fink hold up better, IMO.

reply

I think it's timeless.

It's really a bit of a period piece, ain't it? Not set so back as Barton Fink, but the film came out in '98 and the President Bush we see in the opening scene is Bush Sr., who left office in '93. Saddam Hussein was still alive in '98, but sanctions had been in place for a long time, enough that his aggressions were no longer standing.

Paraquat is a dated term from the '70s. And we see a Jackie Treehorn porn tape on VHS, but by '98, porn was on CDs (a format that started in the late '80s, but really took off in the early to mid 90s thanks to porn). Kraftwerk vinyl and all, the old Venice apartment, the old cars, Jacky Treehorn's lovely manse (which was on the market recently), all harking back to an era that was hardly the turn of the millennium.

That, and laziness still abides.

So does the memory of our brothers, who died face down in the muck so that we had the freedom to make these here posts!!

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

I was thinking about re-watching it. I haven't seen it since it came out and I wasn't a fan. It's always been one of my least favorite Coen brothers movies.

What other people love about it, the Jeff Bridges and John Goodman performances and the jokes, always fell flat for me and if you take that away, what's left?

I will rewatch it again, though. Back in 98 I was a senior in high school and I was much more interested in doing drugs than watching a movie about doing drugs. I've re-evaluated a lot of movies frok this period on second watch.

I have to say, it seems like references to this movie comprise about 50% of all movie references
online.

reply

The fact that it's way more popular now (and always increasing) than when it was first released should answer your question.

reply

not too good, man..

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0399663/mediaviewer/rm2605296128

Come on you old son-of-a-gun and hey, while you're at it let Buster do a line off your boner!

reply

You stole my joke! lol



(\___/)This is Bunny! Put him on your
(='.'=)signature to help him gain
(")_(")world domination

reply