MovieChat Forums > The Shining (1997) Discussion > Neither Stephen King or Kubrick Actually...

Neither Stephen King or Kubrick Actually Changed Alot From The Novel


Kubrick's just took most of it out (the stuff that happened during the first month that the Torrance family was in the hotel) which was necessary to not make the 1980 an extremely long movie. The only real differences are Halloran dying, Jack using an axe, and the change from room 217 to 237. The Stephen King miniseries(which I love as well) was just putting back in what Kubrick took out. I saw both versions of the Torrance story as equals in my critical sense.

reply

[deleted]

Kubrick change more personally. Which is why I enjoy the mini-series more

reply

He changed a lot more than that, the ending was completely different, The characters were not portrayed accurately, there was nothing about the grass maze, blood coming out of the elevator, or any of that.

reply

Saying that the characters were not portrayed "accurately" is like saying that Kubrick wanted the characters to be just like in the book. He didn't.

reply

In the book,the kid didn't talk with his finger either.

reply

The Kubrick movie has very little in common with the book. The only things that are the same is the name of the characters and the fact that they stayed at the Overlook hotel.

reply

Not claiming it's a close adaptation but it has a lot more in common with the book than that. Almost everything that happens prior to the ending is a variation of something that happens in the book.

reply

*****SPOILERS*****
The topiary animals coming to life, The wasps nest, the addition of the Hedge Maze, the hose attacking Danny, the exploding boiler (it creeps), Tony being Danny's voice of reason, Jack's continuous chewing of aspirin, the croquet mallet attack on Wendy, the subsequent destroying of Jacks face with said mallet by his own hand
and the ghost's attempt to seduce Halloran in the end, were all major changes/omissions by Kubrick...
That Is One Nutty Hospital!

reply

Really if you want to see a true adaption REGARDLESS If its any good,Then check out this mini series.

If you want to see a much different story that has the same premise as Kings Book and still manages to be a masterpiece and of the great horror films of the 20th century I'd go for the 1980 version.

'Hey hey mama said the way you move!'

reply

[deleted]

So you said her didn`t change much and then proceeded to describe some of the big changes.

Kubrick hacked up the story, and most importantly changes the biggest point, Jack Torrance, he isn`t supposed to be evil and crazy from the start. He is troubled character but is in essence good and the redeeming moment at the end where he destroys the overlook is his final act.
Shelley is another problem, book shelley is not just a screaming, shrill annoyance, in the film she is and honestly anyone spending time alone in isolation with her would try and kill her, even if they weren`t crazy.

Sorry but a character being killed off when they aren`t in the book is a big change.

You also forgot the massive change, the reveal at the end on who the person no one else saw who helped danny was. In the film he just comes off as mostly disturbed.
Are you really trying to say that King doesn`t know his own story, yeah that makes total sense.





Shiny. Let's be bad guys.

reply

In a couple of ways the 1980 version is actually closer. The character of Grady seems much closer in the film as well as his two conversations with Jack. Also the miniseries leaves out Lloyd! I know the miniseries in closer in almost every other way but I found this interesting.

reply

[deleted]

Well, in regards to Kubrick, this post suggests almost everything was changed in some small way: http://jonnys53.blogspot.ca/2007/12/differences-between-novel-and-movi e.html



Jack "Things could be worse"
Hurley "...HOW?!"

reply