MovieChat Forums > Crime Traveller (1997) Discussion > Lottery Episode Emblematic of why this w...

Lottery Episode Emblematic of why this was cancelled


I've been watching this series episode after episode, having bought the DVD series.

It was pretty good for most of the way, but by this episode it was clear that humor and whimsy are no substitute for plot. Let me explain.

Early on, the series established a few things, among which were the following:

1) Our hero who traveled back in time could not create a paradox by doing something that would change what was reality that had always been fact, and

2) He could not bring something back from the past, like a piece of paper (like a lottery ticket--which would have become erased).

Ok. So now the Lottery Episode. Out hero says that he can avoid all problems by not buying the ticket himself, but telling Holly (or, at the end, someone else.

This violates #1.

The only way this *could* have been done correctly would have been if he had not known if he had won at the time he decided to go back. Because then it would not have violated what was fixed.

reply

I don't care much for the Lottery Episode either, but I think the show deserves far more than 8 episodes.

reply

Why couldn't he buy a lottery ticket and leave it with his bank manager, so the ticket need not travel in time but just progress naturally a week into the future? Or post it to himself second class mail? It makes no sense.

reply

Yeah because as long as the ticket itself didn't time travel with Jeff, but rather stayed in it's own timeline, say in a safe box at the bank, it should have survived for Jeff to go back and get it when back in his own timeline. All hypothetical of course but still tons of fun to speculate on !!

reply