MovieChat Forums > Trainspotting (1996) Discussion > Let's discuss the ending

Let's discuss the ending


I was surprised to read so many comments and reviews see the ending as a happy, optimistic one. And I'm not talking about how Renton says "there are final hits and final hits", implying a continuous relapse. Which is a good point... but what really interests me, and the reason I'm not sure what to make of that ending... is the "Choose life" speech which bookends the film, as well as the fact that the claimed "happy ending" is based on morally suspect money to fund it.

First, we hear the "Choose life" speech at the beginning told in a completely sarcastic, dismissive tone. Renton describes a mechanical, consumerist low existence and informs us that he chose something else. Renton eventually decides that this something else is undesirable... but at the end, the fact that they chose to refer back to that cynical opening speech to look at his future, drugs-free, "happy" life is surely significant. I'm not sure how exactly, but it definitely didn't give me a "happy" vibe.

My unsure feelings about the ending are also increased by the fact that Renton now wants this materialistic future which he rejected at the beginning only after he makes loads of dirty money. I have slight reservations about seeing a hopeful ending when that hope is enabled by drug money and betrayal.

I'd like to hear other people's takes...

Last watched: Cabaret (8.5/10), The Butler (4/10)

reply

I never viewed it as a "happy" ending technically, but I guess a positive one. He's shedding his old life which was holding him down in every way and now he has an option of making a better future. To me it really doesn't matter how he got the money, it's the fact that it's an opening and a way for him to be "normal" if he wants to be. But you also get the hint that he might go back to drugs and/or might not want the "normal" life after all. A great ambiguous ending. Just my opinion.


--------------------------------
dies ist meine unterschrift

reply

At least he wants a future. Many junkies would have just shot all the cash up their arm. But that's why people use drugs in the first place - they feel like they don't have a future. When you hit hard times (or worse still, are born into that sort of life) and are living off the dole you just can't get ahead and many can't see a way out of it, it's all about instant gratification and escapism. he did bloody well to even get where he was in the end.

reply

I use drugs because they're fun, thank you very much.

reply

Any ending that does not involve him being a heroine junkie should automatically be viewed as positive. The fact that, at the beginning, he criticized the life he later wants to lead only shows that his character had an arc.

reply

That is true.


--------------------------------
dies ist meine unterschrift

reply

Any ending that does not involve him being a heroine junkie should automatically be viewed as positive.

Objectively speaking, I agree that capitalism is better than heroin addiction. But why did the movie make the point of criticizing capitalism in such a sharp way then at the end say that it's the correct way forward?
The fact that, at the beginning, he criticized the life he later wants to lead only shows that his character had an arc.

There's no exploration of that arc though. What he says at the end in no way responds to his earlier claims like "wondering who the *beep* you are on Sunday morning", "watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing *beep* junk food into your mouth," "rotting away at the end of it all". That opening monologue is not challenged, so it still stands as we see Renton choosing this at the end.

Last watched: Cabaret (8.5/10), The Butler (4/10),

reply

Objectively speaking, I agree that capitalism is better than heroin addiction. But why did the movie make the point of criticizing capitalism in such a sharp way then at the end say that it's the correct way forward?

Any type of life is better than the life of a junkie. I don't think he necessarily subscribed to the life of a consumer - I can see him working for a while to put a bit aside then hitting the hippy trail!

reply

I don't think that was the movie criticizing capitalism. I think that was Renton criticizing capitalism and having second thoughts about how he thought of it before. It was more about the character than some critique of society.

reply

Renton wasn't even criticizing Capitalism. He was saying that Heroin matters more than anything you could imagine. It's hard to explain unless you've been on Heroin or Opiates. I love Film, I love Music, I love New Clothes etc etc... But, drugs were better. Of course that's just a lie. Eventually drugs ruin you... But that's not the thought process when using. The next hit is all that matters

reply

After all, who needs reasons when you've got heroin?

reply

I know what you're saying. The end didn't feel positive to me, due to the point that was made earlier about there basically always being the chance to relapse at any time (the final hits bit) and Rent throwing his sobriety away like it was nothing.

I think it was meant to depict uncertainty about his future. He has a little money, he can function and find a sense of content sober, he recognizes and wants this to be a new beginning. But with his history and the nature of addiction, will he not relapse?

I believe the positivity of the ending was more a reflection of the moment regarding the high he received from scoring the money and him telling himself it was a good move and that he can turn it around (not that he is assuredly going to). I don't think it extends beyond that. I don't think it says anything concrete about the future of the character besides uncertainty.

reply

It's the exact ending you get from "The Graduate" and "The Bell Jar" and other media/books like that. Basically, it leaves you with an emptiness. Not sure if it's a positive or negative ending or how you're really supposed to feel.

reply

I think you're right, "emptiness" is thhe right word. I think that's kind of negative but it does encourage thought and discussion, and I'm open to hearing from people who find it positive.

reply

I can understand how you feel. As others have mentioned, the ending leaves a similarly empty feeling rather than an outright positive one. Hence the lasting appeal of both movies. However, it's also ambiguous and how you interpret the ending might depend on your personal feelings towards Mark's choices. Personally, I think any life would be a step forward from the even more empty existence he was leading at the beginning of the film, which is why he continually tried to get away from it. Even if the money was ill-earned, I think Mark did what he had to do to abandon his old lifestyle.

See you in hell, candy boys!

reply

I liked the ending. In fact I think it's one of the best movie endings ever. I agree Mark's a horrible person. And I don't think it was the drugs or his social circle alone that made him bad. When hes in London, away from them and clean, hes still horrible.

"I quite enjoyed the sound of it all. Profit, loss, margins, takeovers, lending, letting, subletting, subdividing, cheating, scamming, fragmenting, breaking away. There was no such thing as society and even if there was, I most certainly had nothing to do with it. For the first time in my adult life I was almost content. "
Says it all really. But I think hes capable of becoming a better person.

I don't think he was wrong to steal from them - Sick Boy is a nasty, twisted drug dealer and pimp who gets teenage girls hooked on drugs and pushes them into prostitution to pay for it. Read the synopsis for Skagboys on Wikipedia, the things Sick Boy does in that book are horrifying. As for Begbie - do I need to say more? 😄

He left money for Spud, the only truly kind one (apart from Tommy) Okay it was drug money, you have a point there. But the people in this story aren't meant to be nice or likable. And yes Mark does sound slightly sarcastic at the end- but as the above quote proves he was happy working and having his own home. Mark has at least realized 2 things - hes a bad person and needs to change and Heroin didn't actually make him free or truly happy, it just slowly destroyed him. I like the ending because it gives us the hope that maybe, just maybe, he will get clean and will change. The money was his only escape and only chance.


history is a battle fought by a great evil, struggling to crush a small kernel of human kindness

reply

[deleted]

It’s a good ending except for the fact that Renton doesn’t seem to realise that his ‘mates’ would never let him get away with stealing their money. These are criminals, and Begbie is a particularly vicious psychopath with strict morals and a knife - he’d spend every waking moment looking to stick it in Renton and get his money back, and Sick Boy would be right alongside him.

Renton smiles at the end and ‘chooses life’, but in reality he’d have about a week before at least one of them found him.

reply

This is what I wondered about, but his taking his passport suggests that he probably went overseas.

reply

I haven't seen Trainspotting 2 yet, but in the sequel novel Porno, he went to Amsterdam and bought a bar. Do you realise who hard it was to find someone in another country before internet was in every mans pocket?

reply

Be easy for any determined person. For a start the internet already existed in 1996, but even if it didn’t… find and threaten their family/friends for information. Intercept mail. Befriend police or some other officials with access to travel records.

reply

I've been online since '94 mate. When IMDb was just a fan page, I know there was internet and that's why I said "before internet was in every mans pocket!".

And no, it wasn't easy. It was a pain in the arse. Criminals could evade the police for years and Begbie was just a stupid drunken lout.

reply

Well then I’m sure the pursuers would use desktop internet 🤷🏻‍♂️

In any case, a set of determined people, especially psychos with nothing to lose like Begbie, would easily track down Renton.

reply

My memory is a little hazy, but I think Trainspotting was set around 1987. So maybe not as much access to the internet then. In Porno, Begbie was just getting out of prison and had been there for 20 years, so I think he wasn't able to go after Renton. I think when he gets out that's the first thing he does.

reply

Right, so Renton got extraordinarily lucky that Begbie was immediately arrested and incarcerated for 20 years, and even after that he harbours a bloodthirsty desire for revenge.

Had Begbie not been arrested, I’d be surprised if Renton would have survived a month.

reply