MovieChat Forums > Striptease (1996) Discussion > Her 'dancing 'was awful

Her 'dancing 'was awful


She looked like she was having seizures she snapped so much. Not fluid at all. But her body was beautiful

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

LOL I loved it but I'm male, so...

reply

Most viewers of this film don't really care about the quality of the dancing, they are just admiring the body.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAIJ3Rh5Qxs

reply

I thought she was an excellent dancer,and I'm a female. She did an amazing job, it's just the script sucked.

reply

Yes she represented white women dancing skills greatly in this movie

reply

She looked like she was having seizures she snapped so much. Not fluid at all.


I noticed that too and i'm male. She's not the best dancer indeed. She tried to be overly sexy but it ended up looking forced and mechanical. Not everybody has rhythm in their blood. I know i don't.

But her body was beautiful


Don't really agree about this though, she was way too muscular. Too much abs and too much shoulders, legs of a bodybuilder and her ass was kinda squared because of the exaggerated amount of muscle mass. Not my cup of tea. Plus, the breast are fake and look like it.

Don't get me wrong, she was obviously a gorgeous woman, way above average. But that's the thing, it looks too artificial and too prepared. It's an overkill in my book. Give me the same woman with 5-6 kg more and i'm happy. Or exactly the same woman but not trained at all, just slim and i take her over Demi in this. But to each his own obviously.

In the same genre, i think Elizabeth Berkeley blows Demi out of the water. She was a true natural beauty and still is, even if her breast might be fake too, not sure. Also, Showgirls is a much better movie as for me, even if often derided too.


People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefsī²

reply

The plastic surgery and whatever training she did made her body look awful as well. A shame because she was hot in the 80's.

reply