MovieChat Forums > Stealing Beauty (1996) Discussion > Strange and Rather Pervy Details Surroun...

Strange and Rather Pervy Details Surrounding this Film


First, I want to say that I love much about this film. I've been a fan for a long, long time. But, I do want to point out some strange and undeniably pervert-ish things about the film, which really do have an influence on it overall.

1. Opening sequence - the man on the train videotaping Lucy (who later turns out to be Carlo, Lucy's mom's good friend) videotapes her without her consent or knowledge - then drops the tape on her literally as the train pulls away and she has no chance to confront him. He wouldn't have known she was Sarah's daughter at the time. Both scary and threatening, plus pervy.

2. Lucy and Alex's conversation - when he first knocks on the door, Lucy is masturbating. Soon after they meet outside, Alex seems very comfortable cozying up to Lucy, caressing her leg as they talk. (Okay, but a bit strange). The conversation turns to sex, which again, is strange, but not outrageously so - just kind of strange for a man of his age and a girl of her age. Then just before she leaves, he gives her lighter back to her, but not before taking her hand and giving it a good whiff (presumably to smell her "essence" from masturbation on her hand). It's also a subtle reference to bodily fluids, which play a larger role in this film.

3. Miranda and Richard's first sex scene. As Lucy eavesdrops on Miranda and Richard having sex (kinda pervy anyway) she is heard first saying "I love to *beep* my little pumpkin", presumably referring to her genitalia. She is heard saying "yes, yes, yes, as he says "Poop is *beep* pumpkin", when suddenly she starts adamantly saying "no, no, no, no" - indicating that he tries at least to enter her poop chute, which she does not approve of. In the midst of this they are interrupted, so the scene never reveals what happens regarding this - but later there is more that reveals this is probably the case.

4. The general obsession with Lucy's dating status in the adult's conversation (which is discussed later but really still is strange in general).

5. The losing virginity conversation after the dinner party, which is okay, but in context with everything else seems a bit obsessive as well.

6. The desire of Ian to have Lucy reveal her breast - which in context with the film's theme of her being his daughter seems a bit strange and pervy, since he gives many clues throughout the film that he is aware she is his daughter, tho she doesn't know until the very end. I will say that from an artist's viewpoint the exposed breast is artistic, and so I'm willing to cut him some slack on this one - but it supposedly is his daughter, and he supposedly knows it, so it is rather weird in context.

7. Niccolo's attempted conquest of Lucy. She has to remove him off of her by force after saying no many times. Very, very close to a rape scenario. Also, what's with the armpit licking? Ewww. Again with the bodily fluids...

8. The woman at the party peeing. This has been discussed ad nauseum, but still bears mentioning. The woman does this to shock Lucy while also revealing that Carlo is into "water sports" sexually. People have asked why this was in the film, but she is enacting a subtle revenge on Carlo for his presumably bad treatment of her, while also revealing his sexual proclivities.

9. Richard and Miranda Part Deux - Richard forces Miranda to watch as Lucy stages her "makeout session" outside, to which Miranda is disgusted - and then as she tries to turn away, forces her onto the bed for sex - which on the surface could be excused as consensual if they like "rough play", but she seems still genuinely scared. Then later it appears that Richard is very forcefully entering Miranda, (presumably again in the poop chute) as she has a horrible, almost terrified look on her face. Shortly after, she is still absolutely furious with him and decides to leave him for good - which could easily be understood given the circumstances described as a last straw. I believe this film portrays his anal rape of Miranda.

10. The unnecessary shots of Lucy and Oswaldo making love, which didn't need to be so graphic in nature - not a crime in itself, but doesn't help the overall pervy theme going down throughout the film.

Some may disagree with these points - but after watching this film many, many times, it's hard not to come to these conclusions regarding these scenes. If you watch with these points in mind, you will have a better understanding of why I say these things. At it's core, this film deals with some very, very mature themes including sex, voyeurism, anal sex, loss of virginity, rape, and paternity. It's easy to overlook some of these things on first or second viewing, but as you become intimately familiar with the film, it's dialog and the way the actors portray the scenes, these themes do reveal themselves more readily.


reply

'Pervy' and 'erotic' are the same result of subjective perspective. Some of your observations are inaccurate. Using your numbers:

3. 'Pumpkin' is Richard's pet name for Miranda, not a reference to her genitalia. He uses the nickname in other scenes, including in front of her parents. The: "Yes yes yes, no no no." line is just Miranda giving him feedback and guidance in bed, which a lot of couples do. She sounds mildly annoyed in delivering that line, not threatened or frightened, in fact she resumes the 'yes' sentiment directly afterwards. There is no evidence for your conjecture that it refers to anal sex, consensual or otherwise, and Richard does not say 'poop' in that scene. Even if it did, there's nothing wrong per se with anal sex between two consenting adults in a country where it isn't illegal.

4./5. Again, subjective opinion. Jeremy Irons' character specifically addresses this issue directly to Liv Tyler's character: "Don't be cross with me, I'm sorry. You must understand, all we have to talk about up here is each other." The distinct impression is given throughout the film that that much is true. As soon as any gossip arises concerning any of the villa's occupants, everyone wants to know about it, even including Daisy the little girl. When she returns from a slumber party, everyone wants to know how it went, what she did there, what film she watched etc., etc., They get so little interaction or outside influence, everything new becomes a matter of intense interest, including Lucy.
Up in that villa they are all isolated from the world, which is a key element of the film. Showcasing the downsides of living in what the outer world percieves as paradise. Human aspects like loneliness, boredom, lack of privacy, being homesick and feeling unfulfilled. Small unpleasant things like stinging insects. Plus the same human negatives that you find everywhere, paradise or skid row: prostitutes, gossip, noisy technology and building work, sexual assault, drunk people urinating at parties, drugs.

6. Ian does not know that Lucy is his daughter until she tells him. That much is clear if you pay attention to that scene. He is shellshocked and even tears up once he realises what she is saying. Before that reveal, he says that he cannot fathom why Lucy would want to visit them. If he knew she was his daughter, or that there was any chance he had a long-lost child, he would not have wondered why Lucy came to stay at his home. As Lucy's mother wrote in her poem, she and Ian only ever had one night together, almost twenty years before the events of the film. And we see from photos that Lucy looks exactly like her mother. Ian had no reason to suspect that the man Lucy called dad was not her biological father.
A lot of people think that he knew because he acts appalled when Diana suggests to him that Lucy may be attracted to Christopher. But what they don't realise is that Miranda and Christopher are not Ian's children, they are Diana's children from a previous relationship, so Lucy and Christopher are not related. Even if Ian knew Lucy was his daughter, he would not be appalled about incestuous implications, because he would know that Lucy and Christopher were not related.

7. Eroticism explains the armpit thing. I find it odd too but then a lot of people do a lot of unusual things during intercourse! The bodily fluids theme is common to Bernardo Bertolucci films. The sexual assault was very unpleasant to watch but then, it's supposed to be! Nothing strange about sexual assault being depicted as horrible, it is horrible.

8. You've explained that one yourself, so I'm not sure what your point is?

9. Literally no reason to assume that scene was anal sex, and Miranda doesn't look horrified, just uncomfortable and pissed off. She had no qualms about giving him both barrels the next morning, and she yells at him all the time, including breaking a plate and hitting him, so I don't get the impression she was afraid of him. That's not to say it couldn't constitute rape, I just don't think that's what the director was trying to convey. Anyway, the point of this scene was to explain why Miranda finally dumps the douchebag and sends him back to America in the next scene. She comes across as resigned and relieved that he's gone, not traumatised.

10. There is only one shot during the Lucy/Osvaldo scene that I would consider even marginally graphic. You don't see any intimate parts, both of them keep most of their clothes on, and the point was to illustrate that there can be beauty in waiting to give away one's virginity to the right person, instead of throwing it at someone who won't treat you with respect, just to lose the 'virgin' label. The shy awkward sensitive person may be less attractive and less sexually skilled or experienced, but sharing that experience with them can still be preferable to sharing it with a shallow, cold, sexually experienced brute. Frankly an uncommon message in today's superficial world of instant gratification and glorification of vulgarity, and a message that I think young people need to see more of in movies.

Overall, really the main disagreement I have with your points is that what you deem 'pervy' is deemed erotic cinema by many. It's Bernardo Bertolucci's style, and a great many people, male and female, old and young, critic and cinemagoer love him for it. Research the artist/muse relationship. Liv Tyler looks back upon her time on this film fondly, in fact she just designed a clothing collection partly inspired by it. Her mother was also her chaperone the entire time she was filming, and she has never had a bad word to say about Bertolucci or the film's content either.
Perhaps it's a free spirit thing, or perhaps you aren't considering the film in the context of the era in which it was filmed. Online social justice warriors didn't exist back then, the paedophile paranoia moral panic hadn't exploded, and not everything was deemed offensive or exploitative like it is now.

All that said, it's a pleasure to discuss Stealing Beauty with someone who has watched it many times like I have, and who has detailed insight and opinions on it like I do. It's been very interesting reading your observations, and there's so much subjectivity to the film that it's likely we're both close to the mark.




The mirror... it's broken.
Yes, I know. I like it that way. Makes me look the way I feel.

reply

These are portrayals of the intricacies of human sexuality and the twists and turns they take. That something can be beautiful and ugly all at once.
This film captures the reality and rawness of this.
I think that their love scene is special and real; perfect idea of awkward first moments first timers.

reply