MovieChat Forums > Pianese Nunzio, 14 anni a maggio (1996) Discussion > He was a sick child molester! Here's why...

He was a sick child molester! Here's why....

posted 14 years ago by BronzeKeilani26
5 replies | jump to latest

I cant believe I read user reviews from the U.S who feel its consensual even though it was a ""13"" yr old boy!!! Those sick perverted in the closet t(rannies) better take a few CHILD/ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY courses and learn the level of thought process CHILDREN are at 13 & through out adolescent. A human being has to go through many levels to attain mental growth from infancy to childhood to adolescence to pre teen, etc., finally attaining full maturity. Some ppl grow old & die w/o ever reaching full maturity b/c they never completed these levels...such as w/ M.Jackson. They're pushed into aduthood much too early by parents who lack parental skills. The brain isnt even fully developed until we're 30 yrs old. A child at that age hasn't even the full capabilities to discern right from wrong much less enough experience in life to fully define the difference. It's b/c of uneducated idiots that society is the way it is. God said we would self destruct at the end times...and I guess this is it. Than they blame the youths for everything being so effed up!

Adults that have sex w/ children & immature young adults are MANIPULATIVE & sick. They deviate these young-minded humans into believing it's ok & natural when it's NOT & the victims are being taken advataged of for the perputrators own sick pleasures. End of story!.

[–] Professicchio 14 years ago

Not that I completely disagree with you mate, but, frankly you sound like the typical puritan, self-righteuos, yank you probably are.

I just wonder if you are really upset by the age difference or is it the homosexual overtones of it all?
My guess is that you wouldn't have bothered to post this if there was a nun instead of a priest, but maybe that is just my thinking.

Let's talk a bit about God now.......................
while I agree that an adult having sexual relation with someone of that age, even on 'consent', is wrong, why don't we go back to a time when the "word of God" was the law and thousands of unions of this kind have received the blessing of holy men for centuries.

It wasn't so strange up to, well, not very long ago, to see marriages were the bride was excruciatingly young, like 13 or even 12, being taken up the aisle by someone 2/3 times older, and this was very common among the noble, well educated crowd, not just the 'uneducated idiots' that you blame. This practice was well known on any variation of Christianity, and still practiced by some countries today (the 'uneducated idiots' countries in your book, I guess they are called).

What was the "Christian Child/Adolescent special psychology branch" doing back then, eh? Or having the Divine blessing made it all OK?
Or was it really the work of God that he gave Science finally the power to came and rectify these moral shortcomings?

It's a complicated world, mate, and God has given you the right to simplify it to your pleasure, if this is what you believe and makes you happy.

I'm happy that 'God said we would self destruct at the end times' though, and I totally agree: why should always be him to have all the fun all the time?

Just try not to believe too hard that the stool on which you stand on is too high and strong for falling with the rest of us when the time comes, you might be disappointed.

Amen

[–] lumosnight 14 years ago

{quote] It wasn't so strange up to, well, not very long ago, to see marriages were the bride was excruciatingly young, like 13 or even 12, being taken up the aisle by someone 2/3 times older [/quote]

They may have married at the age of 12 or 13, but they didn't have sex until they were at least 15. Until then, the girls lived with their parents. So get your facts straight - it was never normal to have sex with a 12 year old, so stop justifying it.

It's a complicated world, mate, and God has given you the right to simplify it to your pleasure, if this is what you believe and makes you happy.

Yeah sure, having sex an underage child is your way of being happy, you sicko.

[–] Professicchio 13 years ago

They may have married at the age of 12 or 13, but they didn't have sex until they were at least 15. Until then, the girls lived with their parents. So get your facts straight

15 still counts as underaged in modern standards, and that fact you are saying was not at all a universal rule, 1 straight fact does not paint the whole picture.

Yeah sure, having sex an underage child is your way of being happy, you sicko.

Never had sex with any underagers, you are free to give me advise as I did, but by insults and prejudice you are just proving the "kindness" of your (alleged but fake) Christian faith, you miserable twat (please forgive me for that!).

[–] lumosnight 13 years ago

I'm not Christian you idiot, I'm an atheist. It's religious freaks like you who think that having sex with a 12 year old is fine.

Though 15 is considered underaged a person can still legally have sex at that age.

[–] Professicchio 13 years ago

Oh well, apologies for misinterpreting you again, or are you just playing around now?
My definition of puritan has got nothing to do with religion but a specific mindset and calling yourself an atheist does not make you any more enligthened than any religious believer: it's just an hard-ass way to try to be the opposite of a religious fanatic, which is, funny enough, still exactly like being a religious fanatic.

Religious freak, moi? Now you're just being funny.

I want to remind you that in most of the Western world the age of consent actually ranges between 16 and 18, so be careful in telling people around that 15yo is OK.
Here, maybe this graph can help:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Age_of_Consent.png