Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, you are either insane or have spent too much time on Non boards to make statements like this. Let's go down the list.
What the supporters of the WM3 do not understand is that all 4 documentaries were created by a directpr who believed that they were innocent.
Are you referring to the Paradise Lost series? If so, there are 3 films in the trilogy. Or are you also lumping West of Memphis into this list of yours as well? So let's take a step even deeper to your own insanity.
Paradise Lost 1: Directed by Joe Berlinger & Bruce Sinofsky
Paradise Lost 2: Directed by Joe Berlinger & Bruce Sinofsky
Paradise Lost 3: Directed by Joe Berlinger & Bruce Sinofsky
West of Memphis: Directed by Amy Berg
So we have three different directors who made films about the murder. Not just "a directpr who believed that they were innocent" as you put it.
Right off the bat he made these films with the notion that they were innocent. They are not.
I disagree. I believe the first Paradise Lost film goes into more detail about the investigation and shows a favorable side for both nons/supporters. As for their guilt, that is just your opinion.
It was just presented In that fashion. People make comments such as “There’s a little thing called DNA evidence, of which there was none.” And that my friends is a blatant lie.
There was DNA testing done on hairs found AT the crime scene (except for the negroid hair, which was "lost") and none of it matched the WM3. So what was the other DNA found?
The attorneys defending these monsters didn’t present all evidence. There were semen stains on one child. I wonder why that was never submitted in court, along with a million other incriminating pieces of evidence.
Quick lesson in law, defense attorneys do not present evidence. The prosecution does, they would have been the ones to drop the ball, not the defense. Also, please cite to me the coroner report or anything indicating semen stains on one child (I know exactly what you are talking about and you are wrong. You are talking about one of Jessie's confessions claiming that Damien or Jason used a pair of pants or a shirt to clean themselves up with). Which was never found to be the case.
They were never brought to light or for a more honest explanation were inadmissible in court, or just merely buried.
The prosecution had such a weak case, they would have jumped at any evidence that they could have had to implicate the 3. Hence why they went with a "satanic sacrifice" angle, hoping that the theme would convince the jury to overlook any physical evidence.
There are so many unanswered questions and so many people involved in these crimes its unbelievable.
Yes, like how did the police lose so much important evidence on this case? Why did the WMPD not interview Terry Hobbs at all after the murders? Why did the WMPD not go after the two boys who failed polygraph tests, knew the victims and fled to California within days of the murders? The list goes on and on!
From the first time I saw damien echols , just by looking at him and into his eyes even through a television screen, I KNEW he was pure evil.
Good God, I hope you never serve jury duty.
Misskelley was a scared low intelligence child who just went along with what was happening and admitted / confessed over and over to police, friends and fellow inmates. One inmate who sent a letter to the authorities begged to keep Misskelley behind bars because of how psychotic he really was.
You are partially right. Jessie is an idiot. He did confess multiple times to the crime. But not a single one of his confessions collaborated with the murders. That is why the first confession you hear the cops keep leading him to the right answer, which he completely get's wrong. He never confessed to friends or fellow inmates nor did an inmate write a letter begging to keep him locked up. This is just the voices in your head telling you this crap.
Baldwin worshiped Echols and would NEVER betray him, so what he did was deny deny deny, just like damien.
Wow...
In and out of hospitals all his life for psychotic tendencies echols proclaimed that his only goal in life was to be famous. And now he is.
His whole life? Why don't you go back and research how many times he was put in the puzzle factory and how long each stay was.
The fact that celebrities that didn’t even know him or the other two killers came forward and raised money to get that out make absolutely zero sense to me.
You do know that just about every celebrity who supported Damien/Jason/Jessie visited them in jail, right? There are countless interviews out there discussing just that.
This wasn’t like Peta entering a slaughterhouse and saving animals. That would warrant such support but not when 3 babies are brutally tortured and murdered.
I have a child about the same age as Christopher, Michael and Stevie. Believe me, what those three went through is disgusting and completely terrible. BUT I do believe a greater miss-justice is keeping 3 other kids locked up for the rest of their lives for a crime they didn't commit.
In my opinion all of those STUPID celebrities are just as guilty for getting them out of jail.
The celebrities didn't pull a late night escape on the prisons. They helped bring the case out to the masses. People who never would have heard of it found out about it due to the help of countless celebrities.
Lorri echols doesn’t have a brain In her head either and if you even watch him in interviews he never shows emotion, not a smile, a laugh or any sign that is he human.
You lost me. Are you talking about Lori not having a brain in her head and that she is emotionless or are you losing your train of thought and switching over to Damien? I can explain one reason Damien wasn't smiling when he was released, his teeth were completely rotten. Death Row inmates get limited medical attention because the prisons do not feel the need to do much other than keep them alive. Do a quick search for him now, his teeth are fixed and he is smiling.
He planned on murdering children and bragged about it. He also intended to do it again and there were witnesses who testified that they heard him say these words.
Lol, you forgot to include the part in that statement where the interviewee told the cops that he saw Damien levitate. So yeah...
They are not innocents wrongly accused. They are murderers who were released by a damn alford plea and get to live on with their hero like titles and pity from everyone they meet.
Once again, completely your insane opinion.
Michael Moores parents should be the ones locked in a room with them and be able to put them to their deaths in anyway they see fit.
Ah, I take it you picked the Moores since Pamela Hobbs and John Mark Byers both believe they are innocent, right?
There was evidence, TONS of evidence.
No there wasn't.
It was just kept from us.
No it wasn't.
When the despicable wm3 die they will rot in hell and Michael Moore, Christopher Beyers, and Stevie Branch will finally be free.
Where do you come up with this?
reply
share
oxdinaxo-652-328330
10 years ago
clearly you have too much time on your hands to pick apart my post sentence by sentence...I got bored real quick and just stopped reading lol
reply
share
laffitte-manon
8 years ago
That's because you're dumb and you talk without thinking contrary to this guy who actually have argumentative and structured reply to all your painful to read nonsense (have you ever heard about paragraphs?)
Worst than your poor writing style is how it's because of people like you that innocent people are being jailed, or even killed by the death penalty, real murderers happily commiting more crimes because police and jury were fool enough to convict someone else, and victims not revenged.
Thanks
reply
share