Going to work is never 'a huge net gain'. Not having to pay for something is not a gain at all, it's just lack of an expense.
In any case, Laura's money is not automatically going to feeding the clones, think about it. She goes to work to earn money, she EXPECTS TO KEEP THAT MONEY, so how is it _ANY_ gain for this purpose?
Women and men don't share money equally: her money is hers, his money is theirs. That's how it works. Of course, this is a movie, so maybe things can be stretched a bit, but still, how would Doug explain the extra sudden drain for no gain to Laura?
Also, they both work so they can keep up their lifestyle, there's no way they have around enough loose money to feed three additional adults (one of which eats and drinks so much, Doug even COMMENTS on it in astonishment, "Where do you put all that stuff?", if I remember correctly)!
No matter HOW you try to explain it, it doesn't make sense, and can't work.
The financials of this - remember, it's NOT only food, but everything an adult man needs, and it can accumulate pretty darn quickly, for three extra adults - make absolutely no sense, but it's only ONE glaring, overlooked problem in this 99.9999% nonsensical movie - the fantastic clone premise is actually the LEAST problematic part of this mess.
I used to respect Ramis as a director until I saw this movie..
reply
share