the rating..


Why so low? This is criminally underrated. How has this movie a lower score than IronMan 2 and 3, Thor 2. One of my favorite movies of all time. Yep you've heard right, of all time .

reply

Ask any fan of the TV series and you'll understand why.

reply

Isn't the task to make a good movie as possible. I judge the movie on it's own.

reply

[deleted]

Isn't the task to make a good movie as possible. I judge the movie on it's own.


OK you're apparently too stupid to actually get it, So I guess I'll just have to spell it all out for you:

Evil

Jim

Phelps

reply

Because contemporary films have a huge ratings machine behind them to ensure high scores, and anything 'old' is considered worth 0 by dumb kids, who are legion.

reply

Many old movies has high rating. But thanks for the theory, conspiracy theorist.

reply

has high rating.


I think we know which demographic to file you under. Thanks.

reply

lol. I love old movies just see my ratings. And english isn't my language sorry for that.

reply

Apology not accepted.

reply

Lol at going out of your way to make a snide reply 5 years later that he will never read.

reply

I hardly went out of my way, I saw the thread was incomplete and plugged the gap. He may never see my reply, but at least you did.

reply

Yeah it was good for a laugh. thanks.

reply

Please enjoy 🙏🏻

reply

Dissatisfied fans of the TV series? Tom Cruise haters? Both?

Either way, it's not a bad rating really, though it could certainly be better (much better).



Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

reply

People love brainless superhero crap these days. Unfortunately, we can't change that.

I have another problem with its rating - why the hell parts 4 & 5 have higher score??? The original is still the greatest. At least I think so. MI 3 is my #2

reply