MovieChat Forums > Matilda (1996) Discussion > EVERY adult in this film would be arrest...

EVERY adult in this film would be arrested in real life.


1) The wormwoods for being neglectful parents and Mr. Wormwood for his fraud car selling business.

2) Miss Trunchbull for child abuse and possibly killing Miss Honey's dad.

3) Miss Honey for not reporting Matilda's child neglect to the higher authority. T

4) The librarian, since she knew that Matilda was a 6 year old girl going to the library all by herself. She knew that Matilda was neglected at home. In the book, it is stated that she likes to mind her own business. She could've report it, but didn't.

5) the so-called FBI cops for not having a search warrant like Matilda pointed out.

reply

Regarding #3, Miss. Honey would probably get in trouble for bringing home an infant child without the consent of that child's parents. I don't know about getting arrested, but she should definitely be fired from her job.

reply

You have a very loose definition of infant. She's seven and a half. Honey didn't force or coerce her and was not holding her against her will.

It's iffy, since she doesn't have the consent of her parents and doesn't inform them. It's not severe enough for arrest and I think it would silly to fire her. Reprimand her, advise her not to do this again. She's a good teacher who providing care and nurturing to a child without interested parents.

reply



yeah dialect. some English speaking countries refer to all young children as infants. in the book she was 5.

reply

It's a STORY you retard. I hope you never breed.

reply

1. Probably not--Matilda had adequate shelter and food, was properly clothed and clean and attended school regularly. She was left at home alone a lot, but no one was witness to that and nothing bad ever happened. Unless the case is severe, parent's aren't usually arrested for charges of neglect. Matilda was mildly neglected at worst, more accurately she was ignored.

2. Yes one the abuse--if there were documented marks or injuries on the children and/or they (or credible witnesses) identified her as their abuser. Probably not on Honey's dad--police ruled it a suicide. There's no strong evidence that she did it and the only word we have that is was suspicious comes from Honey, who was a child at the time.

3. See number 1. Also, teachers are obligated reporters of suspected abuse, not neglect, and Matilda's case was minimal at best. Unless something serious happened to Matilda as a result of the Wormwood's neglect, that Honey was aware of and could have prevented, she's not at fault or responsible for anything.

4. Like Honey in number 3, the librarian isn't privy to any information about Matilda's home life that would lead her to suspect an issue. It's not unheard of for a child to walk to their local library alone. It might not be safe, but it's not really criminal to know about this and not alert authorities if there's no obvious danger or abuse happening.

5. That's not a cause for arrest. Technically, they are federal agents with probable cause to search the residence. They shouldn't act without a warrant if they want to charge Wormwood with a crime with what they find. The worst that can happen is the evidence is ruled inadmissible in court.

reply

Now a days, leaving a small child (4-6years old) at home is considered suspicious. The parents can be fined at the very least. Remember when Matilda was an infant, the Wormwoods left her not only in the back of the car spinning around uncontrollably, but all alone when they exited the car.

Leaving a infant/child alone in a car is a giant NO NO in today's world.

reply

Matilda wasn't physically abused (Beating, etc) but she was being VERBALLY abused by her parents, especially the dad.

He constantly called her hurtful and ride names and made cruel remarks.
(I'm smart you're dumb, I'm big you're little)

Oh! At one point, she was old enough to be in school, but her parents wouldn't send her right away. Don't parents get in big trouble for refusing to send their kids to school.

reply