Demonization


Much of the criticism of this movie centers around the issue of the demonization of Hitler. There is a sort of Shoah lobby out there that takes the view that Hitler cannot be viewed as a human being, and that anyone who does must be a holocaust-denying, jew-hating monster unfit to live in a civilized society. I think this is an understandable but mistaken view. Demonization is a useless exercise that denies us what insights and lessons we can get from the appalling era of German National Socialism. If Hitler was a demon then he is in no way normal and the resulting event was a mere abberration. We will be safe so long as another demon does not come along. History immediately before and after demonstrates that state organized mass murder is no abberration, it is happening in some degree most of the time occasionally rising to a scale and intensity that forces the world to recognize it (but seldom to stop it before it is mostly spent anyway). (Consider also the conumdrum of Rwanda where a body of people rose up to kill the better part of a million of their neighbors in a few months with mere farm tools and without an Eichmann to direct it. Minute for minute, pound of pound arguably the most proficient mass murderers of the century.) Hitler was not a satanic agent, but a deluded, sick, but in specific ways highly effective man who was able to realize his defective visions of power with the help of a powerful greedy, short-sighted few who underestimated Hitler and overestimated their ability control events, and a compliant many who welcomed an end to inflation, shortages and turmoil while not unsympathetic to his virulent hatreds and racist theories. The twin threads of disasterous loss in war, economic catastrope and centuries of entrenched bigotry converged to produce Hitler's rise to power and the holocaust. People not Satan made this happen. We are not safe and will never be safe. Future combinations of past and current events will create more opportunities for murderous regimes to take power and enable crimes on a massive scale. Hitler, Himmler and the whole gang could not have done it alone, thousands had to fevently believe and actively participate. The leader can only enable, it takes a nation to commit the crimes. The only safety will be the vast majority of the population recognizing the disease and refusing to take part, recognizing that to indulge expedient hatred against a few will result in ultimate disaster for all and not solve any problem. This cannot happen if Hitler is viewed as a demon, a fluke, or that he was just a German problem. He was an example of a human problem. Only the scale, intensity and speed not the essence of Hitler's results were distinctive. Viewing Hitler as a man should not be confused with feeling sorry for him or excusing him. Humanity deserves and requires a complete and accurate explanation which cannot happen as long as there is demonization in the process.

reply

I agree.

reply

Hitler states in the opening of the film, "Every man who desires adulation will recognize in me the pure manifestation of that dark part of himself." He acknowledges that he is a 'pure' evil, but he makes it clear that almost everyone possess a lesser form of this same evil. In my opinion, it is a mistake to think that this movie is just about Hitler; it is also about you. One who chooses to demonize Hitler refuses to accept his dark side. Rather than acknowledging one’s capacity for evil, he will project that on to a symbol, a pure evil. By hating the symbol of evil, Hitler, one is reassured of his goodness. By loathing Hitler, one avoids having to loathe himself but also sacrifices the possibility of self-awareness.

reply

Totally dumb analysis, wanting to give his nation an Empire with resources to last them 1,000 years is not evil, not everything in life centers around how precious Jews are. This bizarre need to see Hitler as "evil" is itself the product of Jewish media domination which most non-Jews are too stupid to be aware of.

reply

agreed. without Hitler germany would still be a 3rd world nation paying off the Treaty of Versaille.

reply

This is very interesting (the opening line). Even more-so, is your line about the movie being about Humans/Humanity, and your last line. Quite valid point.

Basic Human Psych: Things we feel about others most reflect what we feel about Self.

[We] Humans oft distance ourselves from things we find distasteful and especially repulsive, in order to avoid identification/recognition of such in ourselves. People tend to think that understanding (or at least admitting to understanding) something or someone means you agree with it or them. This is one of Life's greatest fallacies, as it is most counterproductive. Failure to understand this keeps us in near-constant judgment of each other, and allows us to remain ignorant, inauthentic, in denial, and overall stunted- both individually and as a society.

It is always refreshing to discover others who are able to freely acknowledge this.

reply

I've been saying what the OP has been saying for years whenever this particular subject rears its head.
Of course, I don't explain myself nearly as astutely as the OP does.

reply

Same here.

reply

100 percent agreed. While studying H/3rd Reich in HS, 2 or 3 of us came to understand this, and were the cause of much debate. Unlike our professor, our peers just could not see past the horror. They could not recognize- or refused to acknowledge- that he was a man, and a brilliant one, at that. Political leaders have learned from Hitler's extremely effective manner and style of oration and leadership, military groups and factions have learned from his insurmountable organization. Understand what made him "tick", why he came to feel the way he did, and how he grew his ideas into significant action. Like everyone, he had a story. Our greatest lessons are often learned in/from the darkest places. Understanding does not equal agreement. Since 1995, I have encountered very few [outside of a Psy or Soc class] who understand this point... Until I am able to explain, as a Black woman with proud Jewish ancestry/roots, exactly what you have here.

It seems to take a great mind to be able to weed through the muddy thick of all things, to reach the essential core. Sadly, these great minds appear to be scarce, thus notable lessons oft remain unlearned, and the world/Life even less understood. Thank you for articulating so well.

reply

Interesting comments but why the hatred for paragraphs? It would make your premise much more readable.

More so talk about run on sentences ...

Hitler was not a satanic agent, but a deluded, sick, but in specific ways highly effective man who was able to realize his defective visions of power with the help of a powerful greedy, short-sighted few who underestimated Hitler and overestimated their ability control events, and a compliant many who welcomed an end to inflation, shortages and turmoil while not unsympathetic to his virulent hatreds and racist theories.


C+ at best

reply

Just shot that one in one day about seven years ago. Fair criticism on style. I might fix it up. A+ for content however.

CB

Good Times, Noodle Salad

reply

TOTALLY A+

Made me think of the Banality Of Evil by Hannah Arendt. She suffered the same criticism. Have you seen the film Hannah Arendt? If not you should!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1674773/?ref_=rvi_tt

Do rewrite as it would be rewarding to read!!!

reply

Haven't seen the movie, but I have read some of the book (The Origins of Totalitarianism).

Thank you for the prompt positive feedback.

CB

Good Times, Noodle Salad

reply