MovieChat Forums > Doctor Who (1996) Discussion > I challenge you to come up with a worse ...

I challenge you to come up with a worse movie


this film is sooooo bad

forgetting the whole doctor who franchise for a second (i wasnt a doctor who nut when i watched it or anything)

the acting is awful!! - the main girl and the master's sidekick especially. not too mention that fat guy who tried to be the typical funny man, failing even at that

the writing is terrible - when the writing isnt a general cliche ('why does mr right turn out to be an alien?' when he has done NOTHING to suggest he's mr right) it is simply nicked from other films....hmm guy in shades chasing a car...turning into slime...

the plot has holes and things like the love are totally unbelievable.

NOW if you are considering doctor who it gets a whole lot worse, with a disregard for what was important in the tv show, such as the mysterious element of the tardis destroyed.... i know, 'lets change chameleon circuit to cloaking device!!!!???'

anyway i dont want to keep writing so tell me a film thats worse!

reply

Plan 9 From Outer Space is the worse movie ever

reply

No, Plan 9 has its place in this world. Dirty Dancing is the worst movie ever.

reply


"Dirty Dancing is the worst movie ever."

Definitely not!

Dirty Dancing is not a masterpiece classic, but it deserves its place in the world. And even as a movie, it's not THAT bad, it's just a typical cliché-story chick-flick, with some funny and fun parts and a lot of entertainment value and nostalgy (for eighties as well as earlier decades that the movie portrays).

There are many things that make it worth watching/having/existence - and I definitely can't understand the hate for that little movie.

1) It has Jennifer Grey, who played Ferris Bueller's sister in all her rage magnificently. Not the prettiest face in the world, and oh my goodness, what a schnoz, but she is 'believable' and tolerable in this movie, and kinda fun to watch anyway.

2) It oozes the eighties' magical feeling, and even the summerish autumn variety. When you watch this movie, you immediately get into a 'summer mood/feeling', especially in certain parts.

3) It has wonderful musics. The soundtrack of this movie is certainly one of the best ever, and it could easily have been -so- bad, considering all the stuff they are doing in this movie, and its 'rockabilly'-stuff. How can anyone watch this movie and not FEEL deep and interesting, inspiring and very sensitive experiences, largely because of the music? The melancholic piano, when 'Baby' is walking on the grounds, looking for something to do, should be enough to make anyone remember those perfect summers of the eighties in their own lives (unless they never experienced something like that, in which case, I pity them a lot, they don't know what they are missing). The relaxed atmosphere and mood of a summer and slower-paced era, when there was enough time to just walk around and do nothing.

The dance musics are also surprisingly fantastic, and who can watch the part where 'Baby' is practicing with the blonde dance-hag, rhyming their movements perfectly with the music and each other, while the camera slowly pans around them, without at least some kind of admiration, if only for beauty of movement and fit female legs?

And of course the big ending song, it starts a bit boringly and slowly, and then really gets up to speed, bringing the most glorious 1980s' energy straight through the viewer's whole being, shaking the viewer completely like an earthquake, and inspiring him/her/it to dance. How can anyone say a movie with this kind of glory could even be 'bad', let alone 'the worst'? Have you not seen a lot of movies?

4) It shows a nuclear family in a positive light. A father that is the honest head of the family, and how families used to go on vacations together, as a unit. How often do you see this in a modern movie?

5) Beautiful locations. Any movie that shows this kind of wonderful nature and inspiring locations, can't be all bad.

6) It has pretty eye-captivating dance scenes. They really practiced hard for this, and it was worth it - it all look gorgeous on-screen. A movie with such beautiful movements, filmed so gorgeously, can't be 'the worst'. There are movies that have NO REDEEMING QUALITIES WHATSOEVER, and not only a few, but dozens and dozens, perhaps even hundreds or thousands. Pretty much any modern movie is like that, but these eighties delights are like rare candy, the kind that you almost never get anymore.

7) There is a 'good feeeling' about the movie, even about the story - it ends in an uplifting note, relieving the viewer to feel good after all the tragedy. Phew! It's good to feel good, isn't it? Why would you rather feel bad?

8) It shows the modern audiences different eras - the most wonderful one, where it was filmed in, and the ones it depicts. This builds tolerance and intriques the viewer, perhaps to find more about history, and how it all was back then and what happened. Not many films inspire people anymore.

9) Despite all its misandry and a little silly "rich princess is bored"-core of its plot, it also shows that a man can have a lot of problems, even if he can 'score' a lot with rich hags. That a man can also be sexually abused, and a man can really suffer from the lack of options this world offers him, while women are getting the luxury of 'daddy-money' and 'glass floor', that the men can't even dream of. (Though realistically, Penny would have not had any trouble raising the money, being a woman.. and I am not even talking about prostitution)

10) There is an air of INNOCENCE about the movie. Not every movie has to be gloomy, dark, 'adult' and 'realistic' and whatnot. Human beings also need VACATIONS from the too-serious, depressing things, a flight into a fantastic world of great music and 1980s' vibes, colors and summer atmosphere. We also need to embrace all sides of true humanity, not only the perverted horror-loving side that so many entities of this planet have somehow developed (for reasons that I can't fathom).

You can't watch and enjoy a movie like this without opening up your innocence, so this movie does you a favor by asking you to do it.

You obviously failed.

And it's your own failure that leads you to the fear of this movie that makes you create rash statements so that your fears would be validated, and that movie would be proven to be bad somehow, which means you don't have to take it seriously or learn to listen to your innocence that wants to get out and needs to be heard..

Next you will be saying Back to the Future sucks, because there is a time machine, and that Innerspace is lousy because you have never been shrunk. What are you doing in a Dr. Who-forum anyway? Shouldn't you be somewhere in some financial forum, debating about economy tactics or in some horror/military forum, discussing about zombies?

reply

I say I hate Dirty Dancing and suddenly I hate Back to the Future? Um...K. I'm really not sure where ANY of the things you're saying in the last few paragraphs of your post are coming from, but I hope that in the time since you posted it, you got some weed and settled down.

As for me being in a Doctor Who forum? I've been a Whovian since the 70s. Long enough to know that Whovians get ruffled when you spell it Dr. Who.

Exterminate!

reply

You are absolutely right. The film is dreadful.
At the time it was just so great to see Doctor Who back on the tele, even though it was American and so obviously rubbish.
The fact now that we have the series back and made by the BBC (hooray) makes this peice of utter tosh almost completely redundant.
Apart from the regeneration and McGanns portrayal there is really nothing else to recommend it.
The Terminator style Master, the Kiss (aaggggh), the fat bloke, the plot etc etc etc, oh and not forgetting the 'smurf' Daleks...

p.s. the 'Planet of the Apes' remake was worse maybe...

reply

I loved it at the time....but looking back there are many many bits of it that I can't stand. However, I thought Sylvester McCoy and Paul McGann were pretty good, it was well directed and the special effects / lighting / music was good. Certainly seen many, many, many far worse films with practically no redeeming qualities whatsoever. For me the worst film of all time is "The Aurora Encounter"...a little-known sci-fi effort which is so bad it makes to want to chew your own face off.

reply

Lessee....Puma Man
Rawhead REx

There are few things more confusing than hearing someone say, "I forgot the midget."

reply

I rather liked the movie - okay cheesy, but so what? :p

Worse films than this...

*thinks*

Cats and Dogs, Men in Black 2, Terminator 3, The Tommyknockers. Okay I'll stop there ;)

reply

Look up "Timothy Hines" on the Imdb.com and check out ANY of his films. They are beyond anythign you could possibly imaging. Especially his version of War of the Worlds, shot on a camcorder for about $5k.

Where Science Meets Keith Chegwin...

reply

"How to Marry a Millionaire" was worse. But it had Marilyn Monroe, Lauren Becall and(my personal favorite) Betty Grable(so it wasn't entirly without merit.

Quick! To the Bat Fax!

reply

Death Tunnel.

Utterly appalling tosh, made worse by the fact that the cinematography is incredible and unbelievably wasted.

I challenge anybody to actually sit through that film and know what the hell is going on.

reply

uhhh T3 was like ten times better than this

reply

>Lessee....Puma Man
>Rawhead REx

Frankly, I would thank you *not* to remind me about "Rawhead Rex."

I saw *that* one on TV in the 80s and as soon as I saw the title just now, (nearly 20 years later, mind) I knew /exactly/ what it was. Frightening...

Frankly, I think the OP overextended himself when he posed the question. The Who movie may not have been the greatest event in cinema history, but "challenging" someone to come up with a worse film is tantamount to "challenging" them to the matchbox jump portion of the Upper-Class Twit of the Year Competition.

reply

Manos Hands of Fate

reply

You want a worse movie? Ok TITANIC i mean what the in name of rassilon was the point in that??????? It wasnt even based on the real Titanic it was really really bad!!!

reply

Van Helsing or Godzilla (1998)

reply

worse films than this

titanic
hulk

they were atrocities against humanity

Whisht lads haad yor gobs Aa'll tell ye aall an aaful story
"did the titanic bend? no!"

reply

Fargo

reply

Seen better... seen worst...

The original two Peter Cushing movies come to mind...

ant-mac

reply

home alone 4....it sucked and had really bad actors in it.

reply

[deleted]

Ghastly film that urinated on the doctor who legacy from a great height. Those who responsible for making this abboration deserve to be strung up. It had the glossy hollywood look but in reality it was just another of these crappy films with suspect plot, hammy acting and a patronising "aren't the Brits and their accent cute" undertone. I can't tell you how disappointed I, as an ardent fan of the tv series was when I sat down to watch this drivel. It was like turning up at the Ritz for an expensive meal and being served up huge plate of sick.

In response to the above poster, the man who wrote Jonny English is also the same bloke who produced the worst James Bond film I have ever seen [the last one, can't even remember what it was called] and this is perhaps reason enough to keep him at arms length from setting foot near a laptop to write a film script ever again!

Mr Purvis if you're reading, don't give up the dayjob mate!

reply

It was a disapointment at the time (it prompted my one and only letter of complaint to Aunty Beeb) but it's marginally better than 'Rose' 'Aliens of London' and 'World War III' in my book.

Yes the kiss, the half human, the search for a atomic clock, the smurf Daleks (with colds) all chaffe like a pair of hair weave Y-fronts but lets not forget the horrors that might have been.

The Doctor searching for his father, befriending a hip-hop street kid who teaches the lip shaped time rotor to rap. No honestly. The Cybermen looking like Mad Max extras calling themselves the Cybs. A devestating time-war between the Timelords and the Daleks.....oh emmm

reply

Okay, this movie was bad. As a fan of the british series, I can say that this movie was so bad. But I've seen worse. I could name many films that are worse than this one, but when I think of truly bad films, there is only one that I have experienced that is the most truly, horrible thing ever put on video.

Cheerleader Ninjas.

Sit through that one and see if you think this movie is worse. True, the movie was bad, but it's definitely not worse than Cheerleader Ninjas.

reply

[deleted]

umm lets see ....
"Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle" << this movie sucked realllly bad

thanks ;p

reply

Battlefield Earth
Underworld
The Crow2
Ring2
War of the Worlds(spielberg)

Name a movie worse than the Doctor Who tv movie(which I liked)? Hell it would be easier to pick a movie that isn't worse.

Your making the mistake of thinking your more important you actually are.

reply

it wasn't that bad sure a bit cheesy but paul mcgann does a good job as the doctor i think

worse movies.
hulk

reply

Look, in my opinion, I thought it was an alright movie. Fair enough, it's majorly cheesy at times, but the end scene basically sums up The Doctor's life. No matter what, he's ALWAYS gonna end up alone. That's his life.

I don't care what anyone says, eventually, Rose is gonna leave, and he's gonna have to continue on his own. Fair enough, he'll find a new companion in the first episode of the series without Rose, but he's generally always gonna have no-one but himself.

Buffy: The Vampire Slayer RPG -http://abuffyrpg.proboards54.com/index.cgi

reply

[deleted]

Catwoman, anything bye Uwe Boll, Glitter, Doom, so much more. This film isn't that bad.

reply

Easy

Timothy Hine's "War of the Worlds"

And believe me, it's hard to get any lower than that

Personally I like the Dr. Who movie. It's weakness was a poor script write, Paul McGann had to endure it. Listen to his Big Finish productions and I gurrantee you'll see him in a different light

reply

you wanna see a truly awful film? check out 'adam and evil'

i have never seen the words 'dude' and 'f@ck' so overused in a script.
the movie as a whole leaves you with that warm glowing feeling of "what? that's it?"

reply