MovieChat Forums > Diabolique (1996) Discussion > Will this ruin the original?

Will this ruin the original?


I've seen the original french version of diabolique and loved it. Will this version ruin that for me?

reply

um.... no




I am Jack's complete lack of surprize.

reply

DEFINITELY NOT! It was better actually... I thought. Try it out. Take a risk. lol. Sharon Stone was great and so was Kathy Bates. Great movie.


Jesse T.

"You, your whole family, everyone you ever knew will all get chainsaw enemas"
- Bette Midler from Ruthless People (1986)

reply

I thought the original had more of a creepy feel to it...
And the remake's ending was too typical.
Overall I liked them both, just one more than the other.

"Hated by fools and fools to hate. Be that my motto and my fate."

reply

[deleted]

This remake sucked man!!! The original is a lot better, much more creepy, more feeling and a better end of the movie. I have to admin that the actors played good in the remake but the ending is so unbeliveable. Watch the original, not this one!!!

reply

Yes! It completely ruins the original, but at least you saw the original first. I couldn't believe what the director did to the new one. The ending just doesn't even make sense! The ending is what is most brilliant about the original so for them to change it for the newer version is ridiculous. See it if you like, but beware.

reply

The remake really sucks. I hate how nowadays you can throw a little nudity here and there, a cheese ending, and riding on the fame of the original version, and it's suddenly omgtehbestmovieinteh world. Clouzot's version is way better. I nearly died during the bathtub scene when Vera Clouzot was screaming her eyes out. And nearly died again when the little boy said he saw her. That was some really scary sh*t.

«You're a killer.»
«Partly. I'm a cop.»

reply

There's nothing wrong per se remaking a film provided there's some sensible reason for doing so. Remakes however of classic films are rarely if ever better and are usually markedly worse. Remaking a bad or mediocre film makes some sort of sense; remaking an excellent one is really rather foolish and is done simply to make a bit of easy cash on the back of the original film's reputation or to make films available to the culturally monoliterate. Occasionally one can end up with two rather different films (both good) so The Magnificent Seven is a good film even if it is not a patch on The 7 Samurai because it transposes the story into a different cultural universe but US remakes of French films have a truly dismal history. Compare sometime Luc Besson's sizzling Nikita with the pallid American remake or Molinaro's wonderful Cage aux Folles with the perfectly execrable Birdcage (a veritable horror of inappropriate acting and bad timing). Not to mention - and I would really very much rather not - Three Men and a Baby.

It is not worth getting into an "it's better - no it isn't" dialogue but it is really worth looking carefully at Clouzot's Les Diaboliques (if necessary frame by frame). If after that anyone still fails to understand what makes Clouzot such a wonderful director and this film of 1955 such an imperishable and inimitable classic then possibly they should consult an optician.

reply

[deleted]

This film, remake or not, is unimaginably poor. The acting is laughable, and the script is catastrophically bad (e.g. "That's not God, that's a woman detective with one breast."). Indeed, the sub-narrative concerning Bates' mannish, man-hating, mammary-challenged policewoman is baffling. Whatever inspired Sharon Stone, Cathy Bates and Chazz Palmintieri to appear in this utter stinker is beyond comprehension.

Put simply, do not watch this film.

reply

How would one version ruin the other? Will your player kill the original if you watch the remake?


I only have one photograph in my hands...

reply

what? why would that happen? you've already seen & loved the original so, why would a poor remake ruin your that experience, after the fact? i saw the remake when it came out, before i even knew it was a remake. still, when i did finally see the '56, french original, right from the start it was a lot more enjoyable to me. sure, the 90's allowed lurid (& clumsy) 'sex' scenes to be shown, & a more crisp, saturated film, in color. but, those things were wasted on jeremiah chechik's banal film making, especially compared to henri-georges clouzot's original. though i have to say, when i saw chechik's "benny & joon", i loved it. but as with diabolique, i was young & inexperienced. i imagine if i saw both now, i might not be able to stand them ...
oh wait! i'm responding to a post from 4 years ago???
damn ... i'm a time-wasting-film-dork.

reply

Nah, it doesn't ruin it. I absoultely love the original, and I thought this was a rather entertaining rehash of the story. The thing I liked most about it was the re-creations of all my favorite scenes from the original. As for the acting, I thought Sharon Stone was flimsy in this - she was good in one scene, then God-awful in the next, and it seemed that way throughout the whole thing. Adjani was great though, and I thought both women were fairly well-cast and had the right 'looks'. Stone's performance is forgivable, because she was good in certain areas, it was just in some scenes I was cringing at her delivery... maybe it was just the fault of the script?

With gorilla gone, will there be hope for man?

reply

I think the twist at the end of this movie is good and I think the the plot of every remake should be somewhat like this means even though the plot is same but the story is slightly different from original.So I think this movie is good compared to the remake of psycho which was some what scene by scene remake of original and also portray of psycho character was also different and comparatively the portray of psycho character in original is best compared to new.

reply

I think the twist at the end of this movie is good and I think the the plot of every remake should be somewhat like this means even though the plot is same but the story is slightly different from original.So I think this movie is good compared to the remake of psycho which was some what scene by scene remake of original and also portray of psycho character was also different and comparatively the portray of psycho character in original is best compared to new.

reply

I was scared of our bathroom at night for years, making sure the door was always closed before I passed it. And the freaky thought that a face would appear in a window, that had been photographed.

reply