MovieChat Forums > The Craft (1996) Discussion > Representation or Misrepresentation of P...

Representation or Misrepresentation of Paganism in this film?


Im doing at essay for my 4th of uni on the representation or misrepresentation of Paganism in this film.

im currently looking for opinions of people who are both pagan, or not. and to get a general idea about how people feel the wiccan perceptions are put across the film.

Both sides of the argument are equally as important. im looking for how people thing the film helped ideas of paganism or maybe how it didnt do it any favours.
how did it make you feel about the magik? did you like costume and music? how about the invoking of Manon - was it depicted correctly?

i understand that the craft deals with the concepts of Manon (which is not infact true but if it were) so im really generalising with the idea of paganism as its core concept!
i hope to hear all your opinions soon!

PJ

reply

The witches in the movie The Craft are not Wiccans.

This brings me to a major point that desperately needs to be addressed.

WICCANS DO NOT OWN COPYRIGHT OF THE TERM 'WITCH'

Wicca dates back to only the 1950s. The majority of the "magic" performed by Wiccans was actually "borrowed" (some say "stolen") from other magical traditions, such has hooodoo or rootwork.

With regards to the movie, there was a Wiccan consultant but it needs to be stressed that the characters were not Wiccans and Wicca is the new kid on the block, not the "old religion".

reply



Okay: -
so when any typical teenage girl watches this film and is not well educated in the world of paganism, wiccan or anything along these lines and shes thinks wow the craft makes being a 'witch' seem cool - she gets a representation - or maybe a MIS representation: and this is precisely my aim.

im looking for what the films does - what the characters are practising is not accurate and too many it casues offense!!

so im trying to see how it makes people feel. Generally speaking any kid who watches the film ultimately sees this 'other world' as brilliant in comparison to the nations hegemonic ideas of christinaity or other religions ..

but how it does this and why it chooses to focus on elements such as 'being blood sisters' and using tools such as the Athame (sorry if i get this wrong) in their spiritual practices is what my concern is - how are these things becoming stereotypica;l of being a witch?? and is this right or wrong??
does it show the crafts ideas of witchcraft to be exciting and elaborate in comparison to what actually occurs?

the fact that we have to go into discussions shows how some of the media mixes all these groups and belief systems up - and it all become a bit confusing.

the question is: How do you feel about the craft? if you practice magic (and i use the term incorrectly no doubt) how does the depictions offered in the craft affect you? do you think they over exaggerate? what do things like the costume add to it? do all 'witches' dress like Nancy?

these are all very crude questions i understand but its all about how the cinematography, costume and story line effect what we think witches are!


be open and honest im looking for all the help i can get!

thanks for taking the time to reply !

PJ

reply

Okay: -
so when any typical teenage girl watches this film and is not well educated in the world of paganism, wiccan or anything along these lines and shes thinks wow the craft makes being a 'witch' seem cool - she gets a representation - or maybe a MIS representation: and this is precisely my aim.


Why would they get a misrepresentation about paganism and wicca when the movie is not about paganism and wicca?

im looking for what the films does - what the characters are practising is not accurate and too many it casues offense!!


The only people who get offended are fanatical Christians and ignorant Wiccans who can't get it though their heads that Wicca doesn't own copyright on the word "Witch".

but how it does this and why it chooses to focus on elements such as 'being blood sisters' and using tools such as the Athame (sorry if i get this wrong) in their spiritual practices is what my concern is - how are these things becoming stereotypica;l of being a witch?? and is this right or wrong??
does it show the crafts ideas of witchcraft to be exciting and elaborate in comparison to what actually occurs?


It's a movie. The Athame stems from ancient ceremonial magice. You will not find the history of the tools of witchcraft in the movie The Craft becuase it's not a documentary, but rather a fictional movie.

the question is: How do you feel about the craft? if you practice magic (and i use the term incorrectly no doubt) how does the depictions offered in the craft affect you? do you think they over exaggerate? what do things like the costume add to it? do all 'witches' dress like Nancy?


The Craft is a movie. I like it. I've seen it many, many times. I don't know why you would ask if all witches dress like "Nancy", as if Nancy was the only witch in the movie. There were three other girls! Besides, Nancy was more close to what is called "Goth".

I like the movie The Craft. The movie is not about paganism. The movie is not about Wicca. The movie is just an entertaining film concerning a group of four witches, that's it. I seriously think some people read too much into it.


reply

Why would they get a misrepresentation about paganism and wicca when the movie is not about paganism and wicca?

Because not everyone is as informed as you and those people make assumptions that the movie is related to paganism and wicca. It happens.


--------------------------
Posting and You: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9q2jNjOPdk

reply

I think the problem here is that by suggesting that 'The Craft' is a misrepresentation of Wicca, it suggests that the blame is on the film, rather than the viewer's odd assumptions.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah! Can You Dig That? I do!
Thanks, Conjureman!

reply

they used actually spells and incantations in the movie in fact they mentioned how when they were invoking manon some creepy *beep* happened

"The crew had to return to the location a second time to complete filming interrupted by several weird occurrences that even caused witch consultant Pat Devin to raise an eyebrow. As the fog rolled in at midnight, the four actresses used actual Wiccan rites and language to invoke powerful forces. Then, as Fairuza Balk's character Nancy attempts to invoke the deity Manon, a flock of bats hovered over the set and the tide rose dramatically, extinguishing the circle of candles. Witchcraft consultant Devin recalls that 'Manon, a fictitious creation for the film, sounds very close to Mananan, the Gaelic god of the sea. Luckily, we weren't all swept to sea!'" Director Andrew Fleming is quoted: "'Every time the girls started the ceremony, and only when they would start the ceremony, the waves would start coming up tremendously fast, pounding heavily. Then, right when Nancy says her line, "Manon, fill me," right at that exact moment, we lost power. It was a very strange thing.'"

reply

I know this is way late. I get busy, but in the very least I think it is still worth hearing. The "Hollywood" elements (such as people flying, etc...) make Witchcraft and Wicca seem "cooler"; they make Wicca seem like a religion where your personal powers can manifest almost any supernatural occurence you can think. However, the laws described such as using magic without ethical boundaries--that is very real. Wiccans do use Athames in many circles. As for outfits and music, some witches dress that way and some do not; some listen to that music and some do not; a lot of that has to do with generation and generational trends in music and dress do not necessarily offend me. The owner of the Witch shop brings an interesting look to the film so that you realize not all witches are gothic or that they go to prep schools.

reply

randian,

I know you mean well, but the movie the Craft is not about Wicca or Neopaganism. It's about witchcraft.

I know it's very hard for Wiccans to get it through their heads that they don't own the copyright on the word 'witch', but us non-Wiccans will have to keep reminding Wiccans that they are the new kids on the block, not the wise elders.

reply

I suggest you take a step back and stop being so into yourself. As a practicing pagan for over 30 years, it really annoys me when people assume that they are the self righteous authorities on Wicca, witchcraft, etc. And it is plain that you obviously haven't a clue that Wicca is a spiritual path, witchcraft is a practice. Perhaps some self education is in order before you pretend to educate anyone else.

I came to Casablanca for the waters.....

reply

Your religion is circa 60 years old. My practice is centuries old. You are not my elder. My tradition was documented to have been practiced in the U.S as far back as the 1700s, but probably far older.

I'm a conjure worker. What I do is not a religion. It's a practice. What I do is an actual craft, as in an art, skill, or trade. More and more Wiccans are coming to us to learn "magic" because they realize there is no craft in Wicca, since it's new.

I'm very open-minded and I believe in the freedom of religion. However, I can't stand Wiccans and Neopagans who act like they are the elders of the magical community when in fact they are the new borns.

Every Girl With A Henna Tattoo And A Spice Rack Thinks She's A Sister To The Dark Ones.

reply

I'd advise you not to make blanket statements like this. I've met plenty of Wiccans who behave like this years previous to the film coming out. Minus the Hollywood special effects.


Conjureman wrote:

"The witches in the movie The Craft are not Wiccans."



But who else wants it after they've smeared it with their grubby handprints?

Conjureman wrote:

"This brings me to a major point that desperately needs to be addressed.

WICCANS DO NOT OWN COPYRIGHT OF THE TERM 'WITCH' "



Probably not. Likely it's a bit longer than that. But likely not much past the start of 20th century.

Gardiner likely took some left over folk traditions he was invited into, added some Masonic and Golden Dawn rituals to it and slapped the name Wicca on to it.

It was the repeal of the British witchcraft laws that caused him to come forwards with it publicly.

I'm not sure I'd agree with the idea he added any Afro-Caribbean things in. Most of the the things he'd have been party to were the British and European oriented society groups.

Conjureman wrote:

"Wicca dates back to only the 1950s. The majority of the "magic" performed by Wiccans was actually "borrowed" (some say "stolen") from other magical traditions, such has hooodoo or rootwork."


DIE VILE BLASPHEMER! OFF WITH HIS HEAD! ;-)

[b]Conjureman wrote:

"With regards to the movie, there was a Wiccan consultant but it needs to be stressed that the characters were not Wiccans and Wicca is the new kid on the block, not the "old religion".

reply

not only that but faruza was a consultant as well since she is actually wiccan

reply

I realize that this reply probably comes long after you're done with your paper, but since you didn't really get much of an answer, I thought I'd give it a shot.

While the earlier poster is correct, and this movie isn't about Wicca, the vast majority of the people who will watch it won't know know that. Unless they are Wiccan, know a Wiccan or have bothered to find about about Wicca they are likely to assume that the movie is a representation of Wicca. And that is very unfortunate, because Wicca is NOTHING like what is portrayed in the film. Wicca and Paganism in general are, at their core, peaceful, nature-based spiritual paths. Remember what you put out there, comes back to you three-fold.

Blessed Be.

reply

While the earlier poster is correct, and this movie isn't about Wicca, the vast majority of the people who will watch it won't know know that. Unless they are Wiccan, know a Wiccan or have bothered to find about about Wicca they are likely to assume that the movie is a representation of Wicca. And that is very unfortunate, because Wicca is NOTHING like what is portrayed in the film. Wicca and Paganism in general are, at their core, peaceful, nature-based spiritual paths. Remember what you put out there, comes back to you three-fold.

Blessed Be.


I agree. The one area that I would have to disagree on is:

Remember what you put out there, comes back to you three-fold.


This is an example of Wiccan propaganda. This is called "The Law (or Rule) of Three". This concept was made up by Wiccans circa the 1970s. This belief has been crammed down the throats of the public by Wiccans who misrepresent magic, either due to ignorance, or worse, to enforce an agenda.

reply

[quote]Unless they are Wiccan, know a Wiccan or have bothered to find about about Wicca they are likely to assume that the movie is a representation of Wicca./quote]

I don't think this is the case.

I think most people will be aware when watching this that they are watching a fictional account of witchcraft rather than a documentary on any real-life contemporary religion.

There's no reason for anyone watching this to assume that this movies depiction of 'witches' are any more an accurate portrayal of contemporary people who self-identify as 'witches' than there would be for someone to judge 'real-life vampires' by the movie Dracula.

reply

As a wiccan I have to say, that the craft is like a page out of my diary. I cannot tell you how many times I just got together with the guys to call the corners, only to have it end in a perception warping hex battle.

Its almost like a documentary.

Like that part where faruizas hands turn into snakes... people do that to me all the time. Sure its scary at first but after a while its just annoying.

reply

And sometimes I will like want it to rain so bad that the pipes in my room bust and there's water everywhere. Other times I will just want it to be quiet really bad and then I'll go deaf for like three days straight.

reply

Dude..! Youre a natural witch!

reply

Rad! Let's go steal from the occult shop, cause you know, everything in nature steals.

reply

Five finger discount! I can show you how I slit my wrists...the RIGHT way!

reply

You're gonna cry, then I'm gonna cry, and then we're all gonna cry.

But seriously you should stop. You could go blind....hairy palms.

reply

Lol Uvtha and Conjureman...had me laughing out loud.

Conjureman...interesting that you refuted the "three-fold law"...I don't believe in that either. Do you know why that started by any chance?

It's time to SAVE BURMA. http://uscampaignforburma.org

reply

Who knows? Probably someone thought it sounded cool and began teaching it as fact.

One of the things I've noticed now is that many Wiccans are stating that you can't do any magic for personal gain. At first I laughed at such a silly statment but the more I heard Wiccans say it the more I felt like I had heard it before somewhere. Then, voila! I watched an episode of Charmed, and don't you know, that is exactly where the fluff bunnies got it from!

reply

If the Wiccans can't do magic for personal gain then they will never do magic. Even a health spell to cure someone is selfish. You benefit from it in the end. You can keep the person longer with you.

reply

I highly doubt that Conjureman knows its origins, but I could be surprised. However, there has been a claim that the term was largely used by Raymond Buckland in his works. He does use this term. However, its basis stems from Gerald Gardner's book High Magic's Aid.

reply

Nope. The "three-fold law" was not invented by Gerald Gardner. I don't know who exactly created it but I do know that it first arose in the 1970s.

And just for the record, it is false. The three-fold law may sound cool and just, but if you actually think about it it's neither fair nor just but more of a boogeyman used to scare people into obediance. Some people even go as far as claiming it's ten-fold! LOL

reply

I give names to books. You do not. Then, you expect to say something? I am right. You are wrong. Grow up and learn some reality by actually reading some f ing books.

reply

Perhaps you need to cool off or collect your thoughts before replying. Gerald Gardner did not invent the three-fold law. Just for clarification the three-fold law is not the same as the Wiccan Rede, in case people may be confusing it. The three-fold law is the belief that whatever you do, good or bad, will come back to you times three. This belief dates back to only the 1970s. It did not originate with Gerald Gardner. After my last reply to you I did a google search and came upon a site by a Satanist who claimed the three-fold law was created by Raymund Buckland in one of his books published in 1970.

As far as your insistance that I need to read books, I read constantly. I read every single day. I think the problem you have is a standard problem with the majority of Wiccans. If it appears in print and if it something you desperately want to believe, then you eat it up and preach it as truth without any need to fact-check or source-check. This is why you believe in Leland's "The Gostpel of the Witches" and Margaret Murray's "The Witch Cult in Western Europe".

There is a huge misunderstanding on the originans and nature of Wicca. Like all religions, Wicca has it's own mythology. For Wiccans, their mythology is a fictional history. Just as with Christians who will fight with people who state that the Garden of Eden and the snake did not occur, Wiccans will fight with anyone who attempts to address their fictional origin story.



reply

in Gerald Gardner's 1949 novel High Magic's Aid it states this
"Thou hast obeyed the Law. But mark well, when thou receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold." (For this is the joke in witchcraft, the witch knows, though the initiate does not, that she will get three times what she gave, so she does not strike hard.)

reply

Oh- and Erica Jong is an English major who not only does not have an anthropology degree of any sort, does not seem to actually be involved in any coven or group work as reported in her Amazon biography. She's not even said to be a world traveler gaining some sort of first hand insights.

reply

Oh- and Erica Jong is an English major who not only does not have an anthropology degree of any sort, does not seem to actually be involved in any coven or group work as reported in her Amazon biography. She's not even said to be a world traveler gaining some sort of first hand insights.


If you actually took the time to read the book, Jong states in the intro that this is not a book on Wicca, nor a how-to-manual. Instead it is a artistic and poetic-inspired journey to discover the archetype or figure of the witch.

reply

Then it has no place in our dialogue if its only purpous it to be a "poetic-inspired journey" when we are trying to talk about historical craft. After all, you are the one saying that Wicca is only a modern reconstruction of pagan practice and I'm claiming that many of its tenets are taken from ancient pagan practices; those things require history and not poetry. The only line of interest in Jong's book (not from a historical influence mind you) was this one on page 12: Her [the Witch's] great, great, great, great, great, great ancestress is Ishtar-Diana-Demeter. All of these are mother figures. And, Diana in particular was associated with the moon in Roman literature. It is derived from the Latin (dium) to signify the "luminous sky"; you can read this in the works of Horace who lived before Christ and in a time that worshipping goddesses was acceptable. The Roman poet Callus wrote "Hymn to Diana." These guys were living during the times that people were devoted to horned deities such as Dionysus and goddesses such as Hecate. In fact, Ovid's account of Medea says that he swears to be true to Medea "by the sacred rites of the three-fold goddess"-Hecate (Metamorphoses 7: 94-95). Ovid also lived in times where altars were devoted to goddesses such as Diana and Hecate.

reply

Then it has no place in our dialogue if its only purpous it to be a "poetic-inspired journey" when we are trying to talk about historical craft. After all, you are the one saying that Wicca is only a modern reconstruction of pagan practice and I'm claiming that many of its tenets are taken from ancient pagan practices; those things require history and not poetry. The only line of interest in Jong's book (not from a historical influence mind you) was this one on page 12: Her [the Witch's] great, great, great, great, great, great ancestress is Ishtar-Diana-Demeter. All of these are mother figures. And, Diana in particular was associated with the moon in Roman literature. It is derived from the Latin (dium) to signify the "luminous sky"; you can read this in the works of Horace who lived before Christ and in a time that worshipping goddesses was acceptable. The Roman poet Callus wrote "Hymn to Diana." These guys were living during the times that people were devoted to horned deities such as Dionysus and goddesses such as Hecate. In fact, Ovid's account of Medea says that he swears to be true to Medea "by the sacred rites of the three-fold goddess"-Hecate (Metamorphoses 7: 94-95). Ovid also lived in times where altars were devoted to goddesses such as Diana and Hecate.



If you actually took the time to read the book you would discover that Jong buys into the works of Margaret Murry and believes in the existance of a secret, underground, pagan cult that survived Christianity. I've already touched on why this is wrong.

I love the book, Witches by Erica Jong, but not because it's historiacally acurate but rather from an artistic perspective.

Wicca and much of what constitutes modern Neopaganism is only similar to the paganism of the past in the claim that they worship the same gods.

For a good understanding of the origins of Wicca, visit my blog on Wicca below:

http://thedemoniacal.blogspot.com/2010/09/wicca_10.html

reply

I didn't read the whole thing (and will acknowledge that). Your blog on Wicca essentially has all of the elements. Thank you for that much. AS for the bit on Summerland, not all Wiccans believe that we go there in between incarnations, but many do. Have you ever read Valiente, Gardner, or Buckland? I am just curious. I am wondering how you found out so much crucial information and put it in such a concise manner.

reply

I read a lot. I have Wiccan friends. I've even participated in Wiccan rituals before (C.U.U.P.S.) I'm not opposed to Wicca and am supportive of it. The only problem I have is with certain Wiccans who push their beliefs on magic onto the public aa if their views reflect all magial traditions. Of course I do get annoyed at fluff bunnies.

reply

What are some of the most important books to you? You can take your time.

reply

On my blog entry I posted a few books every Wiccan or person interested in learning about the origins of Wicca should probably read.

I also like Witches by Erica Jong, due to the artistic appeal, but of course I don't agree with the notion of the Margaret Murray material.

I think it's not that important as what you read vs. how you respond to it and if you are intelligent enough or are able to discern when the author veers off the road into fantasy land. For example, you can read the books of the dreaded Silver RavenWolf and as long as you have a good Bull**** detector in place you can walk away with at least some useful information. (Though I must admit that I've read only one of her books and decided not to read anything further from her! LOL)

reply

You forgot my fan-fic literary adaptation of "the craft". It's considered by most to be a seminal text.

reply

This thread is interesting. What is your opinion on Scott Cunningham. Was he one of the fluffy bunny practitioners?








AVADA KEDAVRA!!!

reply

I heard it was 50-fold. *nods*

Give someone a hang nail with your dark wizardly, and the next day red china has burned your home to the ground.

reply

Keep in mind the movie never mentions Wicca or paganism at all. Maybe it could have helped for the movie team to give a name of it's own to this particular use of witchcraft instead of the generic one of "witchcraft"(sorry for being redundant) so people would be able to set it aside.

Yes, they made research and and got the help of consultant but this was to flesh out the portrayal of magic they used in the film not because they were trying to represent an existing religion at all. No religion has a monopoly of the use of magic, witchcraft, and how the universe works.

This particular portrayal or how magic and witchcraft works is only valid for the universe the movie is portrayed and that is it, we are supposed to accept as Superman is able to fly in its own stories, and as magic works a certain way in Harry Potter.




reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I would say "didn't do it any favors". I'm not Wiccan but I've studied witchcraft and the occult all my life and I have several friends who are Craft. (There is a lot of paganism, and a lot of witchcraft, that are not Wicca, that's just one particular way of doing it, and the previous comment talking about the origins of Wicca is spot-on.)

I wouldn't say I was offended by this film, more like annoyed. But I think that most people watching it, even if they understand that the special effects and so forth are way over the top and unrealistic, are likely to get the wrong idea of what is involved in Wicca or in real witchcraft. I could see somebody's mom warning them not to check out Wicca after seeing this film.

The film seemed to be a kind of updated Reefer Madness with witchcraft in the place of dope, especially in the portrayal of Fairuza Balk's character, who ends up in an insane asylum.

There is no one book that has everything, especially since there are zillions of different kinds of witchcraft and magic. It's a very personal thing, which is one reason witches keep their own books. There are some very good introductory books like Paul Huson's Mastering Witchcraft, but in reality Sarah would have come out of that store with about six or eight books, not one. And all the books would say different things.

There is no such god or entity as "Manon". Wiccan belief is centered around a Goddess who creates and permeates everything, and a male fertility god like Pan. The Goddess primarily runs the show, and the portrayal of a male god giving the girls their powers is inconsistent with Wicca. Non-Wiccan magic might not invoke any gods or spirits by name. In the old pagan sense, it doesn't make sense for women to ask to be empowered by a male deity. (Look up "Monica Sjoo", she wrote the best on this subject.)

The invocation ceremony had some real stuff to it, mostly the four directions/elements part. And there really are love and beauty spells, they just don't work like that.

Take the scars that Bonnie had. A real spell to get rid of them might have the result that Bonnie "just happens" to hear about a new treatment by a doctor who wants volunteers for a test, and she does, and it works.

(The "just happened" thing is key. One of the best books on how witchcraft actually works is Jennifer, Hecate, Macbeth, William McKinley, and Me, Elizabeth. But you didn't hear that from me.)

A lot of real magic involves changing yourself, your thought patterns or attitudes. It is very subtle and takes a long time. A lot of it is giving nature a push in the right direction. Also, changing your appearance through ordinary means like jewelry, dress or makeup counts as witchcraft. It's "glamor and fascination" and is used by both men and women.

I was also annoyed with the fact that the film didn't show the good you could do with magic, like healing sick people or helping someone get a job. One of the most famous rituals was done to stop Hitler from invading England in 1940. And overall, the film was badly acted with stereotype characters. I notice Fairuza Balk's career went down the toilet after she made this.

But was it the worst witch film ever made? Nah. At least it shows kids they shouldn't misuse it.

Don't forget your tsvets!

reply

Molly-31,

The creators hired a Wiccan consulstant. Originally each girl was going to call deity by whatever name they wanted, henc 4 different names. Rochelle was going to call deity Noah! LOL The Wiccan consultant decided that they should all use the same name and that that the name should be a made-up name so as not to use a real name of a deity. One of the girls, can't remember, was using the name "Manon" which is a french female name from a movie. The Wiccan consultant thought that "Manon" would be good to use for all the girls. Alos, Manon on the movie is not male or female. We refer to it as a he out of habit to genderize things. Mannon is "Spirit", the "god" of new agers, hence the term "Invoking THE Spirit", which is akin to the Native America "Great Spirit".

Every Girl With A Henna Tattoo And A Spice Rack Thinks She's A Sister To The Dark Ones.

reply

It was a bit of both in this movie, real stuff mixed with fantasy/fiction. I loved how initially their powers seem to work in natural ways or explainable ways. Neve Campbell's character has the terrible scars all over her back and keeps praying for their "God" to take her scars . . . so her mother later takes her to doctors doing experimental therapy for scar removal and it WORKS! So it happens strangely, yet there is another explanation - but did their "God" actually put these things in motion to work for her? The Rachel True character wants the bully to leave her alone, so the bully character gets some kind of disorder making her hair fall out, which also relates to the bully making fun of her "nappy" hair(There also seems to be a scene missing in this subplot where the bully says hello to her at the party and then we cut to upstairs.) The Fairuza Balk character doesn't want to be struggling and poor anymore, so her stepfather dies leaving a large sum of money to her and her mother(Sort of reminds me of "The Monkey's Paw.") Each one happens in increasingly more "magical" ways, or obviously connected to their magic workings until we reach the third act where it is an all out "witch" battle and it is evident that these girls can do all kinds of magic, but magic that is fantasy. It was cool that it happened gradually, because we also had earlier indicators that they could do these things with the "Light as a feather, stiff as a board" game where Rachel True levitates and Robin Tunney changing her hair and eye color with magic.

reply

I think the concept of 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' was represented extremely well.

'I GOT MOTHS! BIG MUTANT JUNKIE MOTHS!!'- Terri Dolittle (Jumping Jack Flash)

reply

Agreed.

"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens😬

reply

actually Manon was chosen because it sounds simular to Manannan an irish sea god

reply

just take some LSD and get to the heart of the shamanic tradition, via an internal mental shift... for real, that will probably answer your question.

reply

This WASN'T a movie about REAL Paganism, but it was a fantasy full of hot chicks fighting each other LOL:) Hollywood RARELY gets things to do with people of the Left-Hand Path right, then again they DON'T care about accuracy as much as they do about ticket sales.
________________________________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/loveunderlaw

reply

[deleted]

I think many people lump together pagans, witches, Wiccans, satanists and anyone with beliefs outside the mainstream and label all of them as bad.

reply