MovieChat Forums > The Cable Guy (1996) Discussion > I thought it was great...up until the en...

I thought it was great...up until the end


This is one of those movies that falls into people's love or hate category. On the whole I loved it, however it becomes a bit confused towards the end.

It's almost as though they didn't know what to do with Chip's character at the end - switching from the hero (of sorts) whom you sympathised with, to the twisted villain, and back again. I understand what they were trying to do in providing a climax, with a disturbed individual with his back against the wall acting in desperation, but they strayed too far from Chip's nature, or at least what I had come to understand of it. He was disturbed and alone, but he wasn't evil.

The monologue towards the end where he is addressing his mother and talking about being raised by television also fell flat in what I can only assume was meant to be a more poignant part.

And finally, Stephen and his girlfriend rushing to Chip's side as he is taken away..really? After his actions that evening, no amount of compassion would make someone be that forgiving. He's almost just killed her for god's sake. But I understand they needed some resolution. It was just a bit too sudden.

All in all I think it has some great qualities and some really underrated performances, and is mostly hilarious, but the ending all seemed a bit rushed and confused for me.

You know it makes sense.

reply

This is an interesting movie because it's so bad, but it has such good moments, nevertheless.

As a movie, it doesn't really work. As a comedy, it's too twisted, dark, disturbed, and offers no 'release'.

As a serious drama, it's too wacky, unrealistic, nonsensical, silly, and over-the-top.

And of course, it has to have that stupid 'injected romance' syndrome. Why can't there EVER be a male protagonist in a movie that just doesn't care about women at all? Why does every one of them have to be a doormat? Women don't even respect doormats. It's like this guy has no life of his own without the pathetic, wimpy urge to please the va-jay-jay overlord(ess).

The reason why this movie doesn't work, has to do with what you said (very well said), and some other factors. It has good moments, but then it spoils them. It's like it gives you one thing, then punches you in the face and laughs and said "did you really believe I was going to give you that? nyaah!", and then apologizes and hands you a fruit basket and pets your dog.

And then throws the basket through your window.

It's like, the movie doesn't settle, but constantly throws itself around, until no one knows what it wants to be anymore, not even the movie itself.

It would've been better, if there had been a consistency, like in "Liar, Liar" (the best comedy ever, despite the slow, sappy waste of film-moments, and the awkward 'claw' and other non-working 'Carrey + Annoying Brat'-scenes - the only ones, where Carrey seems really fake - I know, he 'overacts' a lot, but he never seems quite as embarrassingly 'fake' as in those scenes), this could've been a classic.

If they had made him clearly one way or another - either never a symphatetic, seemingly innocent guy, or never really all that evil - but they couldn't resist trying to make him EVERYthing, thus making an incoherent mess of things.

They could've also utilized the 'raised by TV'-syndrome a bit better. Obsession about some dish does not quite cut it. Like, him believing all kinds of things that always happen in TV, but never in real life, and all kinds of speech patterns that you hear on TV, but not in real life, etc. Of course that'd be kinda hard, because movies and TVs are pretty much as unrealistic in so many things ..

But I mean, those more subtle, everyday things that you would NEVER say in real life, but you hear in TV all the time, like "What are YOU doing here?!". Does anyone ever say this to anyone in real life?

Wouldn't people rather say things like, "Hey, nice to see you" or "Hi, how's it goin'"?

The most frustrating bit about this movie, is, that it does have so much potential, but then it ends up wasting it all. The funny stuff is not THAT funny (not funny enough, like in Liar, Liar), and the 'thriller' stuff doesn't quite work as a thriller (and confuses the audience, that is ready to LAUGH, instead of FEAR), .. it's like a three-legged horse - it can look nice for awhile, but it can't quite perform the way horses are expected to.

Some good jokes, some nice wackiness, some interesting / good moments, some pretty good ideas - but OVERALL, it just doesn't work, and the ending ruins whatever interesting tension might've been left.

Plus, Matthew Broderidk is SOULLESS in this.

WHAT HAPPENED TO FERRIS, who always gets away with things and is clever enough to figure out how to deal with situations in a very intelligent manner? Suddenly he's just a moronic drone, a mangina, that just sacrifices his own self-worth and life on the altar of fema-fascist overlord. Like all men are expected to do nowadays.

Holy macril.

His character wasn't even very sympathetic, so the audience is FORCED to seek sympathetic characters elsewhere, and even this clearly PSYCHOTIC MANIAC starts looking like someone very sympathetic by comparison.

If they had managed to make someone with a spine, a soul, and a sympathetic nature the protagonist, and toned down the 'evil' of the cable guy a bit, THEN the movie could've worked.

But I don't know, I think the whole idea was a bit non-workable, and they could've come up with something better.



reply

the movie is not bad, you are just too stupid to get it

reply

Well hip wasnt really evil in the film at all just emotional an easy to hurt at the end he wasnt ever going to hurt the girl he really diddnt know what he was going to do as for why they came to check on him it was because they understood were he was coming from an that he had mental problems so they pitied him they understood he wasnt evil just mentally abused

reply