MovieChat Forums > Bullet (1996) Discussion > The last scene *spoilers*

The last scene *spoilers*


No disrespect to this film, because to be blunt I love it. However, the last scene has me wondering. When Louis takes revenge. Is he taking revenge for Butch, himself, the pet rat (heh) or just the viewer? The whole scene seems a bit hastily tagged on. Like someone had second thoughts about ending it with the burial. Were the last deliberations over whether the viewer couldn't handle seeing the anti-hero have his past come back and swallow him without some appeasement, or did the makers think the viewers just wouldn't notice the cycle of revenge running through the film without that obvious hint? I think the film looks better ending on a sad note and a fade to black shot of the L-train rattling off into the city after you see Louis crying would have made a stunning ending.

reply

Totally disagree. I think it would not be in Louis' nature not to exact revenge on Tank, and as such, the ending was brilliant. To end on Louis crying would have spoilt the movie slightly, touching though it was. Payback's a mofo.

reply

If you have a look through the film, there's several scenes that suggest that Louis talks alot about killing but actually he's got something holding him back from hurting anybody. Maybe he's seen enough killing, but he's having trouble shaking all the *beep* the military's pumped into his head.

He doesn't do anything crazy while Butch is getting beat up in the basketball court. There is nothing to suggest he is cold blooded enough to be as coherent as he is while killing Tank. The scene where Ruby tells Louis he loves him is ample to show he does care add the graveyard scene and it's clear. The revenge mission isn't necessary to the success of the movie.

reply

Louis character is a vietnam war hero. He is constantly reading army mags, and the fact that he built that big gun does suggest that he can kill if he wanted to, and to avenge the death of his brother is a good enough reason for him to do it.

Although I do agree with your point, the film could have quite easily have ended at the funeral scene and perhaps the last shot being Butchie's tombstone would've looked quite nice.

reply

I believe Louis loved Butch.He just hated what Butch had become.I doubt if he wanted anyone to kill his younger brother.I dug the way he so quickly came down the rope behind tank.Tank didnt even hear him.Louis may have been unstable,but he showed what he learned in the war.

reply

Totally agree. Louis means business.

reply

I'm not questioning his skills as a soldier. He demonstrated that he still knew how to kill several times, but always with restraint. The asassination was the only time he actually resorted to violence.

Why the cloak and dagger rope stuff? It seems strange that someone who spent so much time analysing situations wouldn't realise that using such a precise military technique pointed the suspect finger at him first. Not that police would care overly about a dealer's death, but his hoods might, further endangering his family. He could just as easily got a gun, shot him and made it would look a disgruntled pusher killed him. If he had flipped and wasn't thinking about the consequences, his acting didn't give that away. It's unlikely anyway, everything was too planned. Watching Tank to work out his habits, finding the spot to descend from, getting dressed up in combat gear.


"What ever happened to death before dishonor?"

Most importantly his act makes Butch's sacrifice meaningless. Butch was trying to end the cycle of violence that was gradually eating it's way outwards. Louis' retaliatory gesture would have ripped open old wounds. His younger brother only narrowly escaped the Butch/Tank feud the first time. I doubt he'd be so lucky this time.

reply

hey autalan,slitting someones throat besides shotting them is quiet.You dont hear someone getting their throat slit.guns draw attention.

reply

Yeah, I know it's more discrete to use a knife, but he didn't have to make it so obvious that he was the one that did it after all that planning was my meaning. He could have made some slashes to his arms to make it look like he was defending himself or something.

reply

He is taking revenge for his brother...In my opinion of course.
J

"I goddamn near lost my nose. And I like it. I like breathing through it"-Chinatown

reply

people get stabbed all the time, in a city there are tons of people who can stab you, if you shoot someone they can analyze the bullet, if you registered your gun your *beep* if not you still have to throw it away, slicing a throat is quick easy and efficent

reply

His throat was slit in a unique manner. Tank would have had little chance to struggle against Louis because it was done before he could react. This would show up when they examined the wound and they would come to the conclusion that his attacker had been trained in the technique. Where do you learn that sort of thing? Who was close to a victim of the victim? Exactly.

reply

Tank was stumbling home drunk on the night he died. He wouldn't have struggled anyway and I also doubt he felt much pain, due to his intoxication.

reply

Firstly he wasn't passed out, half of his swagger was his gangsta walk. He would have struggled. Secondly he would definitely have felt pain, he was drunk (as you say), not full of Nitrous Oxide.

reply

Quick and efficient, and cold-bloodedly personal.

The guy was responsible for the death of his brother...and to shoot him would be letting him off easy. A bullet in the head is a rapid, possibly painless death, brought on by massive trauma to the central nervous system : almost instant shutdown.

A stealthily opened carotid artery is painful, and decidedley non-instantaneous, giving the recipient a bit of time to reflect on the situation. On the street at 3 am, no one is comming to help you...if pressure isn't applied and medical attention given within the initial minute, you're a gonner. The difference between getting an artery, and the jugular, which is a vein...carrying blood under far less pressure.

Ice cold.

reply

Sure it would be a painful and not quite instantaneous death to have your throat slit, but he'd start to pass out after the first ten or so seconds. I'll have to watch it again but I believe the cut was along the entire length of his neck so with both the artery and the vein severed it would have been over relatively quick. With a gun all he'd have to do would be to aim for his liver and Tank would have a whole minute or two of clutching his belly contemplating death. With the added bonus that it would look like a mugging gone wrong. He could call for help, but I doubt anyone could save him by that time.

reply

I don't think he was in Vietnam, if you look at Butch's gravestone, and take into account the older brother can't be more than say, 5 years older, Louis would have had to have been like, 15 when he fought in Vietnam. I don't think so. I think he is more those 'Soldier of Fortune' guys, than a vet, besides he is too crazy to even live with his family. No way he could work in a team. But man, what a role! I love the scene where he is with the kids giving them war instructions. Priceless.

reply

It's possible he wasn't in Vietnam and just wished he was. He must have been in the army though even if he didn't make it all the way through the training. Soldiers of Fortune are usually ex-service who leave to seek more pay in less reputable engagements. Maybe if he was a discharged vet that would be his only means to get back into those sort of situations. The last scene did suggest he was gagging for more action.

Yeah, the scene where he was instructing the kids was great. I can't think of anyone better they could have chosen for his role.

reply

Hey Guys, I've enjoyed reading all your posts. Up until now, it was kinda strange that you guys (well, some of you) actually considered that Louis' character had possibly served in Vietnam. Of course he didn't serve in Vietnam. That's the beauty of his character.

There should be no argument about this either. It is mentioned in the movie by the family members that he is schizophrenic. If he had ever been in the military at all (not just Vietnam, which would be physically impossible considering his obvious age), the dialogue that centered around the family "dealing with his delusions" would have mentioned his actual service. Please don't waste your time watching the movie over and over or mulling it over. It's very clear that the guy was never in the service himself.

I would like to comment on the "last scene" where Louis rappels down from the rafters in the Coney Island train station to drop in on Tank to slit his throat. I noticed that there is a friendly debate about
a)what would have been a better ending for the movie: Either leaving us with seeing Louis crying at Butch's grave - or - leaving us with seeing Tank getting what he deserved and providing us viewers with a sense of closure.

and

b) what method Louis would or would not have/should or should not have employed to kill Tank.

First, let me say that in regards to friendly-debate-(A): I'm well-versed in the art of screenwriting and one of the many things we learn about ending a film is that you have to have a payoff at the end of the movie that will please the audience, not just morally or ethically (i.e. "the right message at the end of the film",) but you must make the ending sensible and it has to coincide with the "setup". During the film, the "setup" regarding Louis' character has been that he is a man capable of deadly warfare and that he actually does care about his brother. The screenwriter/director and the editor placed enough clues (such as Louis sharpening his combat knife) to prepare you for the ending. If they had not, you might be surprised in a negative way. They prepare you for an ending that you feel is "not entirely expected, yet not unexpected either". As to the comment made about Louis maybe not caring about his brother Butch, it is clear that is not the case. If he didn't care about his brother, he wouldn't have worn his formal uniform (that could have EASILY been bought via mail-order form back in the 90's from an SoF magazine) for Butch's funeral. That was done out of respect and love.

So, I feel that ending the movie at the burial would have been anticlimactic and there would have been no epilogue, no payoff, nothing. The ending where Butch is avenged by his brother is more satisfying to the audience and it makes sense that he would do that.

As far as friendly-debate-B is concerned: I think it's interesting that there is a debate on what method Louis' character "should" have used to murder Tank. Using a gun doesn't make sense for a "character" such as Louis. For one, killing with a gun doesn't require much skill. Two, it's impersonal. Three, it's not something a person who has literally "dreamed" of assassinating enemy targets would do. It's the exact opposite of the aforementioned reasons that he would have chosen the knife.

His "assassination" of Tank was conducted like a Special Ops mission, it was personal and it required skill, and therefore it fulfilled Louis' desires to both avenge his brother and to "engage the enemy as a skilled specialist" would.

Louis' character clearly did not want to communicate with Tank's character. He didn't speak to Tank's character at all. He spoke aloud after Tank was dead AND after he had symbolically placed the rat onto Tank's body.

As to the concerns that Louis could've/should've/would've shot him and made it look like a robbery gone wrong so as not to point suspicion at the Stein family. Gimme a break. Louis doesn't give a rat's ass (well, actually he did give a rat's ass to Tank, literally) about making it look like a robbery gone wrong. That would defeat the point of symbolically leaving the rat on the body. It was symbolic to him and he didn't care about anyone finding out anything. On top of that, Tank and his buddies (if he had any real buddies left) wouldn't know who killed Tank anyway, he had plenty of enemies to choose from and there's no way in hell that rat would have just sat on the body long enough for anyone to find there. Also, do you really think that Louis would mind a "war" with anyone that wished to wage one on him? Definitely not. He's insane.

Just a parting notice. I just watched the movie for the first time about 5 hours ago and I missed the part about Lester being a latent homosexual and about 5 minutes before or after that. So I'm not going to say that I know this move in and out like the back of my hand. I would like to say, though, that my observations (based on what I did see, which is 95% of the movie) leads me to believe that I've got the Louis character pegged because his character was written so well and I was fascinated by how well Ted Levine played him and how well the characer was written. I focused on his character quite a bit while he was on screen.

Thanks for taking the time out to read this post. All feedback is welcome.

reply

well done, lamourtal. No feedback is necessary. I was going to reply to this post similarly, but you said it all. Wonderful movie.....

reply

Personally I believe that Louis did serve in Nam, he said so himself that he served under McGinty when he was talking to the police outside his house. I also believe that he turned schizophrenic after the war like many other veterans did as they struggled to adapt to free society. He is old enough too. Butchie was 35 in 94, Louis was his older brother so that could put him in his 40s, so when Butchie died Louis could have been 45 years old. Lets say he served his time during the end of the war in say 1969 and he would have been around 20 by then. More than enough time to serve 2 years.

Also you speak that he was a schizo all his life. How come he is so skilled in modifying guns etc? I think he learned these skills in the army, became schizo but still retained those skills.

I know Sol Stein said in the dinner scene that he has a convict, a schmuck and a paranoid schizophrenic who thinks he is a GI Joe as sons, but this does not mean that Louis could not have been one years ago.

reply

In '94 Louis would have had to have been at least fourty-nine to be able to serve. I'd guess that`s just a few years younger than his parents, so there`s not even a remote possibility.

Louis claims he saved Guerney Howard back in '63 in the "first recon". A few minutes earlier he mentions serving in the 4th Marines under McGinty. A division famed for it's excellence in many battles, J. J. McGinty directed his 32 man platoon over a four hour battle where around 500 enemy soldiers were killed. It`s very unlikely Louis could have been there either in '63 or '66. Let alone both. Going by the gravestone and setting the movie in '94, the start of the Vietnam conflict would be 31 years earlier. Butch would have been four years old, I think it`s likely Louis would have been around ten at the time.

It`s more likely that growing up around the time of the start of the Vietnam conflict would have bombarded Louis with news and specials dealing with the issue all through out his childhood. This probably seeded his schizophrenic fantasies.

As for his skill in modifying weapons he does seem to order from the Soldier of Fortune magazines and he has several books scattered about his room. The gun only involved chopping off a few bits from a shotgun and doing a bit of welding to attach it to the assault rifle.

reply

OK I'm sold. He even spoke of being with the 7th Cav (Aye! I get a big pink boner every time I think about that. Now that was a war. Not this limp dick puppy s**t desert storm smart weapon bs. 7th Cav baby, we were the best.") in the scene where he made his now infamous Sun Tze speech.

So now I am convinced that he has never served in the Vietnam war. He just gets his info from endlessly watching old vietnam war footage. Although if he did want to pick a war, he should've picked WW2. That was a war.

reply

He did serve in the Marines. It's never implied that imlplied that he wasn't. It's ridiculous to think that he wasn't, since there are no clues to show us otherwise.

The Vietnam War ended in 1973, which would put Ted LeVine(The actor) at age 14 or 15. Plenty of soldiers and marines lied about their age to go into the Service back then. That, and they could have easily made his character a little older than the actual actor himself.

The scene definetly should have been included in my opinion. It showed that the underdog, the one who had always been trying to do good in the whole movie(by serving his country), was the one who had all the stuff it takes(brains, balls, honor, loyalty, skill), came out on top, and was the one to seek revenge on the piece of sh it who took his little brother's life. I loved this movie. It's a shame that I took this long to see it.

War does not decide who is right, war decides who is left.

reply

No doubt that the final scene should be included, it's one of the best parts of the movie and gives us a fascinating insight into Louis. It's a great scene to end on and leaves the viewer wondering what would happen from then on. How will Louis' life change with the death of his little brother.

However the previous poster was correct with all the factual evidence of how Louis could have served for all those different brigades. I think it is quite plausible that he just thinks he was in the war but he really wasn't, and he gets all his info from watching all those Vietnam war documentaries 24hours a day.

reply

First, let me say that in regards to friendly-debate-(A): I'm well-versed in the art of screenwriting and one of the many things we learn about ending a film is that you have to have a payoff at the end of the movie that will please the audience, not just morally or ethically (i.e. "the right message at the end of the film",) but you must make the ending sensible and it has to coincide with the "setup". During the film, the "setup" regarding Louis' character has been that he is a man capable of deadly warfare and that he actually does care about his brother. The screenwriter/director and the editor placed enough clues (such as Louis sharpening his combat knife) to prepare you for the ending. If they had not, you might be surprised in a negative way. They prepare you for an ending that you feel is "not entirely expected, yet not unexpected either". As to the comment made about Louis maybe not caring about his brother Butch, it is clear that is not the case. If he didn't care about his brother, he wouldn't have worn his formal uniform (that could have EASILY been bought via mail-order form back in the 90's from an SoF magazine) for Butch's funeral. That was done out of respect and love.

So, I feel that ending the movie at the burial would have been anticlimactic and there would have been no epilogue, no payoff, nothing. The ending where Butch is avenged by his brother is more satisfying to the audience and it makes sense that he would do that.


I missed that setup. I never saw Louis sharpening his combat knife. There's a scene with him soldering a silicon board, a scene where he waves his knife around at some kids while dribbling about Sun Tzu and a scene where he emerges from the folliage carrying his modified assault rifle explaining, "It`s just a little something I`ve been working on. Can stop a tank at fourty yards." So that sets up a number of possible scenarios for the ending. If you take his quote literally you could think it was a pun and he intended to gun down Tank with the rifle. He could have been soldering a trigger device. At the end of the day 'Professional' would have been any deadly means that let him complete his mission and get away.

Sure the last scene looks and feels cool, hell it even has a cool line, but if it hadn`t been there in the first place would you really miss it?

I agree wearing his 'formal' uniform and crying at the funeral showed he cared, as did his reaction when Ruby told him he loved him. I was taking his feelings into account. He cared about Butch, but he hadn't forgiven him for playing hoodlum in his house and stealing from everyone to buy drugs. I came to the conclusion that someone so concerned with fortifying his room and patrolling his house with assault rifles and tasers wouldn't welcome a street war so close to his bed.



As far as friendly-debate-B is concerned: I think it's interesting that there is a debate on what method Louis' character "should" have used to murder Tank. Using a gun doesn't make sense for a "character" such as Louis. For one, killing with a gun doesn't require much skill. Two, it's impersonal. Three, it's not something a person who has literally "dreamed" of assassinating enemy targets would do. It's the exact opposite of the aforementioned reasons that he would have chosen the knife.

His "assassination" of Tank was conducted like a Special Ops mission, it was personal and it required skill, and therefore it fulfilled Louis' desires to both avenge his brother and to "engage the enemy as a skilled specialist" would.

Louis' character clearly did not want to communicate with Tank's character. He didn't speak to Tank's character at all. He spoke aloud after Tank was dead AND after he had symbolically placed the rat onto Tank's body.

As to the concerns that Louis could've/should've/would've shot him and made it look like a robbery gone wrong so as not to point suspicion at the Stein family. Gimme a break. Louis doesn't give a rat's ass (well, actually he did give a rat's ass to Tank, literally) about making it look like a robbery gone wrong. That would defeat the point of symbolically leaving the rat on the body. It was symbolic to him and he didn't care about anyone finding out anything. On top of that, Tank and his buddies (if he had any real buddies left) wouldn't know who killed Tank anyway, he had plenty of enemies to choose from and there's no way in hell that rat would have just sat on the body long enough for anyone to find there. Also, do you really think that Louis would mind a "war" with anyone that wished to wage one on him? Definitely not. He's insane.


I don`t buy that Louis doesn`t care about the consequences. His reluctance to welcome Butch back into the home he stole from isn`t just based on his own personal loss. He doesn't want his family hurt again, but there's also a hint of jealousy. He doesn`t like being treated like Butch`s younger brother, which he clearly is as soon as the favorite returns home from prison. He does get a bit whacked when he flips, like in the kitchen when he wants to order that stun gun. In the last scene there's no sign of that frustration. The revenge comes from the vestiges of his normal personality. That`s why I think, if you're going to include that scene at all, the special forces method is wrong.

And if your theory about him fulfilling his fantasies of being a G.I. Joe are correct there was a more suitable device suggested earlier in the story. The gun (I'm guessing close to the model issued in 'Nam) he`d been working on modifying for who knows how long was just as personal. He could have taken out the whole crew in the limo with that thing. Ambush, hit them quick and hard and there would be no one to retaliate.



So I don`t think it would have been an anticlimax if the movie had ended with the graveyard. For me the payoff you spoke of was Butch`s sacrifice. His attitude clearly changed after Ruby got the knife through his hand to full out self-destruction. He knew he was out of control and had to find an end before it took someone else down instead. It would have been a clean exit for the story. There were more L-Train precursors throughout the film than any that would indicate a man on the edge, grinding his dentures and polishing his knife. Let the L-Train carry Butch out of the story I say.

reply

You know, I felt the same thing that they could have just stoped the movie after Butch's death, that is the payoff, the moral lesson ... Mickey Rourke dies in a lot of his movies (Rumblefish, Angel Heart (well, he goes to hell actually) and Johny Handsome) so maybe the director just took a different direction (or similar, if you think about it).
But this movie is like a hard shot, right from the scene where Flocko gets his eye shanked.
Anyway, I think that it would have been bigger 'payload' to have scene Louis use his modified gun on Tank (sober) and just blown a big ole hole through him, and then have the camera just catch Tanks death expression as Louis reveals himself... Fade to black.
-OR- maybe have Ruby drive into Tank (like he did before), now that would've been even more twisted.
-OR- if you want a kinda 'standard' - it could be between Paddy and Tank (like the shoot out they had in the restaraunt)
just a couple of possibilites
Amazing movie.

reply

Everyone who wrote here made some good points personally I think he looked out for his little bro even when butch and his homeboy were robbing the house and the cops were driving by here comes older bro to the rescue he kept the cops busy so his brother wouldn't get caught. I think he was doing the older bro thing and watching out for his siblings just cause someone is crazy doesn't mean they don't know what's up. He had his brother's back and I think that there isn't much more to it. I suppose they could have left it as Butch being dead end of story but I think a brothers revenge made the story all come together brang a more reality to the story cuz on the streets in real life it never would have ended without some sort of revenge. I think that was the greatest part of the movie.

reply

[deleted]

Hi there.

*-=-=-Major Spoiler-=-=-=-*

I read almost all of the replays to this topic and really appreciate it all.

I watching this movie recently and in my opinion last scene is not good for me.
It's different from all the movie that was shown before. First of all, when or where you see Tank be alone & drunk like *beep* This is the first thing that look most unconvincingly. Then , like from nowhere older brother just find without any problem, most dangerous street gangster in the middle of night, second thing that is very unacceptable for me. Yes, I know that, Lewis follow Bullet at some parts in the movie, but I still cant accept that he will find and follow Tank so easy.

And at the very end, he just put the rat on the dead body of Tank, what's the point desecrate the dead guy or just for revenge.

Anyway , when I was younger I love this scene with all this revenge stuff out there and bla bla, but now I just see it with another point of view, and just didn't accept it.

All other parts of the movie is amazing.

For me the end could be great (like some one write) with Butch's tombstone, then fade to black.

Thanks for reading.

reply


Yup, a totally unnecessary scene, fortunately the only one in the movie and at the very end, so it doesn't spoil much..




------------
23

reply

The last scene seems tacked on,overly crowdpleasing with a dash of Spider-man,Louis being all ninja.....it was a somber,unhappy movie that should´ve had the conviction to stay true to its own tone and atmosphere for the whole movie.

reply

Aside from the performances, this film was kinda subpar to me. The last scene, however, was quite satisfying. No, it wasn't exactly necessary... or was it? I mean it was clear that Louis truly cared for his brother despite the fact that he hated what he was, so... why wouldn't someone like him avenge his brother? Yeah the movie could've ended right before that scene happened, but I honestly think it made sense to include it.


Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

reply