Pedophile's Delight


I wonder how many pedophiles are masturbating to this film....

reply

I don't see much here that would interest a pedophile. At least not more than some other film that features children. There is no nudity. The implied sex scenes are short and don't show much.

Glenn himself is a child abuser, but not a pedophile. A pedophile is someone who perfers sexual relations with children to adults. Glenn perfers his wife as a sex partner, but used Bone once when his wife was unavailable in the hospital. He does rape her in the end, but that scene is more about power and punishment, and not really about sex.

If Glenn were a pedophile he'd be spending his time buying Bone gifts and trying to win her favor, not beating her silly.

My guess is the something like "Willy Wonka" featuring lots of kids would be more of a Pedophile's Delight than this.


reply

You sound like an expert....

reply

I am an educated person and a defender of this film which I think dramatically shows the problems associated with child abuse. I also think it is important to correctly understand terms and use them percisely.

reply

He is a pedophile. He got sexual pleasure from a child. He raped a child. No matter the circumstance (mom in the hospital, power trip) You can not be an adult male who finds sexual pleasure in a child and not be a pedophile- by definition. Was it triggered by the mom being unavailable. Perhaps, but I'd beg to differ...if it was just him not being able to be with the mother he would just have gone to another loose woman in town...be he decided Bone suited him....pedophile.

reply

Amen that would be like saying 'I sleep with women but I am not gay and I don't sleep with both men and women but that doesn't make me a bisexiual' denial! denial! denial! that is all it is. Face it, a pedo is a pedo and if they are right in claiming it is a diseases then cure yourselves and cut off your manhood.

reply

My point here is the pedophiles have certain recognized characteristics. Check out:
http://crime.about.com/od/sex/p/pedophile.htm

Glen really doesn't match up with most of these. He is the type of sex offender who might perfer adult women, but will use anybody he can get. His main chacteristic seems to be uncontrolable anger. The second rape isn't really sexual as much as it is a ultimate punishment for Bone for disobeying him. Rape, for the most part isn't about sex, it's about power.

Why is it important to understand the difference between the two types? Because if you think your child is safe from a person just because the person does not have the classic characteritics, that is not true. There are other people rather than "classic" pedophiles who molest children.

As for the issue of men sleeping with men but they are not gay, well check any prison. There is alot of male rape going on there just because females are not available, and the people involved would not consider themselves gay and would not persue male partners outside of prison. Alot of it, I suspect, is also about power.

Also my interest in the subject springs from the fact that I have had both family and good friends who were molested when they were young and it impacted them for life. And it wasn't always done by someone who would fit the "classic" characterists of a pedophile.


reply

Why the F are you using psycho analogy and criminal definition to defend or excuse Glen's action?! Who cares if he is a pedo or not! He is a monster that should be put in jail and have his ass raped.

reply

[deleted]

so you are saying a person who has sex with a little kid is not a pedo? LMAO

I Need To Know

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

wrong, Glen is a Pedophile by definition.

reply

I wouldn''t be so sure when the type of film that seems to interest you
revolve around children and sex....

reply

Is it wrong for someone to be interested in the subject? That's like implying that rape counselors are all rapists.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Zaphod's rights. That's why there are pedophiles and then there are child abusers.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Thank you! I'm so tired of explicit child molestation scenes in films. I know it happens, but you don't have to show it. The only people who WANT to see that in a film are those who would perpetrate it. I'm not saying it shouldn't be addressed in films, but implication is good enough. Those sorts of scenes haunt me (and not in a good way) and they are unnecessary to get your point across.

reply

[deleted]

For those of you wondering what would be of interest to a paedophile in this movie, as if you needed to, you should note that the poster above me with the username SophiasDoll is a self-admitted paedophile who has a sexual attraction to the 11 year-old Jena Malone and has linked to his desktop wallpaper of the child. He's also watched this film upwards of four times now, and we can all imagine why.








Please see the proof on my profile regarding actual proven paedophile SophiasDoll

reply

[deleted]

Not for the abuse scenes, those are ugly and no turn on at all!


No, of course not, you watched it for the grand total of like one scene where she's actually happy. And you just coincidentally happen to be a self-admitted paedophile.

If anything, I wish I could have boned Bone!


Fixed.








Please see the proof on my profile regarding actual proven paedophile SophiasDoll

reply

[deleted]

Jesus Christ, Kevin. You just broke your own record at making the most disgusting comment so far. Unbelievable.


What's even more disgusting is the fact that it's true...









Please see the proof on my profile regarding actual proven paedophile SophiasDoll

reply

[deleted]

Are you serious? That was actually pretty tame.

Quod Scripsi Scripsi.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

What's curious is that these assumptions are born in Kevin's mind.
If you could attach a digital projector to Kevin's small but still working brain, you'd see the worst child porn you can ever imagine. That's how twisted the nutjob is.


You're acting like I would've had to go to great lengths to deduct these things, lad. Like no one else would possibly even remotely consider the idea that a self-admitted paedophile wants to have sex with a child. I'd have to be a twisted nutjob to put two and two together? The only difference is the words in which I used, which were bloody tame compared the things, say, your bum buddy Spud has come out with. But it's okay when he says those things, right?

In the end, it's really as simple as this:

You're a pedo, Jena Malone/Bone is a 10 year-old girl, you bragged about and linked to a photograph of her in this movie as your desktop wallpaper, it's a movie which contains graphic scenes of child sexual abuse, it's literally putting two and two together.

It would be like a self-confessed serial killer sitting in a room with someone who's interrogating him, and the interrogator saying "So you killed the guy", followed by the killer looking shocked and going "What?! How preposterous! How dare you insinuate that I, a self-confessed serial killer, would even dream of murdering another human being! Such disgusting notions would normally never even enter my innocent mind if you weren't here! You'd better start looking within yourself, because anyone who could consider the possibility of a serial killer wanting to kill someone is an obvious nutjob."

And yes, I realize the comparison is not 100% accurate because there's no concrete evidence that you've molested a child yet, but the fact that you're a paedophile is evidence enough that obviously your primary sexual attraction is toward children and taking those other facts into account about your desktop wallpaper, the nature of the film, etc. it's not rocket science to deduct your underlying intentions. Has bollocks all to do with the fact that you "feel sorry for" the character, you don't watch a girl being abused over and over because you feel sorry for her, if that's all it was then like me and most normal people you probably wouldn't want to see much more of a little girl being hurt even if it is fictional. Yet you can't bleedin' get enough of this film, hell watching it twice I could maybe understand but four times and counting? We all know why, and you're not fooling anyone, son.

Do you have the child as your desktop wallpaper because you feel sorry for her as well? Put it there because you enjoy the feeling of sympathy every time you look at the picture? Or is it another feeling that you enjoy? Which is more likely? Dumbass.









Please see the proof on my profile regarding actual proven paedophile SophiasDoll

reply

It would be like a self-confessed serial killer sitting in a room with someone who's interrogating him, and the interrogator saying "So you killed the guy", followed by the killer looking shocked and going "What?! How preposterous! How dare you insinuate that I, a self-confessed serial killer, would even dream of murdering another human being! Such disgusting notions would normally never even enter my innocent mind if you weren't here! You'd better start looking within yourself, because anyone who could consider the possibility of a serial killer wanting to kill someone is an obvious nutjob."


Now THIS^^ made me laugh out loud!

More of than inappropriate laughter on my part. Ooops

fly....be free

reply

[deleted]