Under Siege 3?

Get back on top? When was he on top in the first place?

I think on a coach full of pensioners going to Eastbourne would make a good US3.

[deleted]

I don't think the 'train' idea can be beat. This movie delivers it all already - there's nothing left. Anything else would be something 'less', going backwards, trying to milk more out of an empty carton.

It's like Austin Powers and the Goldmember, or The Matrix 'sequels' (I don't consider that movie to have a sequel).

Besides, what could be better place than a train? Train offers you all kinds of excitement that other things just can't give.

1) Gorgeous, ever-changing scenery with lots of mountains and nature
2) Nice outdoors action scenes
3) Constant sense of movement
4) A huge area, with lots of different train cars for visual and atmospherical variety
5) The fascination that always comes with trains (there are probably more train-nerds than there are airplane-nerds)
6) Sense of space, open, wide areas
7) Amazing chase scenes (the potential with a train is vast - you can't chase a plane with a car (except in "Knight Rider" and in bad movies), you can't chase a boat with a helicopter (well, you could, but it'd be kinda pointless, because boats are slow, and they have nowhere to hide, but trains have tunnels to hide in and such) - cars chasing the train, helicopters chasing the train, stealth fighters chasing the train - it's all done on this movie, but would not really work with any other kind of scenario.

And airplane would be a smaller, confined, boring area, without any changing scenery (unless it'd be flying low, and even then, the scenery would go by too fast), no 'other compartments' or 'other train cars', and not necessarily even a sense of movement (just clouds passing by slowly - have you ever had a sense of speed or movement in an airplane, besides in the vicinity of land, as in take-offs and landings?).

There would not be much variation in an airplane, and there'd be a claustrophobic feeling compared to trains. You can't really film airplanes in as an interesting way as you can trains (there are so many things you can do with trains - restaurant cars, kitchen cars, passenger cars, bedroom cars, and so on and so forth - in an airplane, everything is very tightly packed in comparison).

If you had an underground base, there'd be no sense of movement or open wide sceneries etc., and of course no fascination of trains, but of course there could be more variety in the different kinds of rooms you could have there.

I just don't think you can top the idea or maybe even execution of this movie, unless you use space ships and other planets and such. And while I would like that (if done right), it wouldn't really fit the down-to-earth-style of Casey Ryback movies.

I mean, let's face it, Steven Seagal's characters are always some chefs or retired ex-chefs that happen to also be some kind of NAVY SEALs at the same time, or something pretty close to that. That wouldn't really work very well in multiple-planets-type of a story.

No, I think the train idea was the best they could have come up with, and what they did with it, was pretty exhaustive. There's really nothing more that could be done with that idea.

The first movie was boring - no sense of movement, just a boring ship, no interesting sceneries, etc.

But they got everything right for the second movie - it's fun, it's hilarious, and aside from the misandry, it's a great, funny flick to watch when you are in the right mood and don't want to take a movie seriously.

For some reason, I can't really talk much against this movie, it's just such a funny creation, and very entertaining. There's just something about this movie that doesn't exist in a lot of other movies - maybe it has something to do with the atmosphere, the nature sceneries, the mountains, the trains, or just how funny Steven Seagal is in this one, I don't know. But I just can't fault this movie too much..

I know how faulty it is, and I know how stupid and moronic many of its plot points and clichés are, but .. I just find myself enjoying it every time I watch it. I can't really explain it.

I listened to the Russell Brand pod cast and his agent I think?! mentioned he was in negotiations to do under siege 3

I think the third movie should be set on a space shuttle that terrorists have taken over and Seagal just happens to be on as a guest chef trying out new recipes in space. It would be his ultimate challenge as summed up in the movie's tagline: "You can't kick when you're weightless."