MovieChat Forums > Land and Freedom (1996) Discussion > Film Condemned by Internatinal Brigader

Film Condemned by Internatinal Brigader


International Brigader condemns
'Land and Freedom'

Bill Alexander, who worked as an industrial chemist before volunteering to fight in Spain, where he served as Political Commissar of the Anti-Tank Battery and then as Commander of the British Battalion, addressed a meeting in London on January 29, 1996, organised jointly by the Association of Indian Communist and the Association of Communist workers. His speech was of enormous significance for the present struggle of the working-class in Britain, and we therefore reproduce the main points that he made below.



Bill started by explaining why he considered it important to study the Spanish Civil War, even today, more thin half a century after it ended. He correctly pointed out that this War has important lessons to teach with regard to the struggle against racism and fascism. These lessons are particularly important today when, in a situation of world economic crisis of capitalism, bourgeois thoughts are turning increasingly towards fascism as being perhaps the only way of containing the working class as it is subjected to ever-greater hardship and deprivation He considered it no coincidence that at this time the books of George Orwell are being produced by the bourgeoisie in several new editions, and it was therefore important that progressive, anti-fascist and anti-racist people act decisively to put the record straight.

The bourgeois ideological offensive taking place at the present time explains the £2.5 million supplied to Ken Loach from some very dubious quarters to enable him to make the film Land and Freedom, which so glorifies certain Anarchist factions which acted in a counter-revolutionary fashion during the Spanish Civil War, and which so denigrates the real heroes of that war - the Communists from Spain and other countries who fought for the Republic - and the international working-class movement, especially the Soviet Union, and still more especially, that most deadly enemy of the bourgeoisie, Comrade Stalin. Comrade Bill pointed out that the surviving members of the British battalion of the International Brigade had offered their services to Ken Loach, but he did not want to know. At the same time, it is planned that Channel 4 next autumn will produce a programme sympathetic to the British fascist leader Oswald Mosely, depicting him as a person whose heart was in the right place but who made some 'mistakes'. This too shows the direction of the present bourgeois ideological offensive against the working class.

By way of background to the Spanish Civil War, Comrade Bill explained that the conditions for that war had arisen from World War I. This had been a conflict between two major groups of imperialists over control of colonies. It ended in the defeat of one imperialist group over another and in the overthrow of the bourgeoisie in Russia, and the formation of the world's first working-class state - the Soviet Union. This was a very dangerous factor for the international bourgeoisie.

This is one reason why, after the end of the war, the German imperialists hastened to build industry and to strengthen their armed forces to the hilt.

But something stood in the way of the Ruhr barons of industry in their desire to develop German industry to its full potential. What stood in the way was the German working class. The German working-class movement was very strong at that time. The German imperialists saw that they had no choice, if they were to fulfil their expansionist ambitions, but to smash it Thus it was that they turned to fascism. In Italy Mussolini did the same thing. In order to develop as an imperialist power, as an effective rival to British and French imperialism, he destroyed the working-class and other progressive organisations in Italy.

The aims of the fascists were, then, to prepare for war with a view to redividing the world, and, in order to achieve that, to smash all working-class resistance. At the start of the Spanish Civil War, fascism had already triumphed in Germany, Italy and Austria. It was now to advance on Spain.

According to the Daily Mail at that time, fascism was inevitable in Spain and other backward countries where people's living standards were low. Spain had been ruled by the army representing big landowners, including the Catholic Church. The Spanish army was a parasitic organism. It had one officer for every three men. Its barracks were situated in city centres, because its main concern was to keep the working class under control. The other task of the army was to maintain Spain's hold over her colonies. In these circumstances the Spanish people were hungry and thirsty for democracy and an improvement in their living conditions. For this reason they formed the Popular Front government. It is important to remember who were in this government. The majority of Republicans were 'liberals'. They were not socialists. There were only a handful of communists in it. Anarchists too had a dominant influence. The Popular Front Government based on this coalition was elected in 1936 and began to carry out democratic changes. Political prisoners were released from jail. Advances were introduced in educational provision. It became easier for landless peasants to acquire land. These changes were too much for the ruling groups mentioned above to tolerate. In 1936 Franco emerged as the leader of a group dedicated to overthrowing the Popular Front government. Franco thought that it would be as easy for him to introduce fascism as it had been for Hitler and Mussolini. But the Spanish people had learnt from what had happened in Germany and Italy They knew fascism was their main enemy and that they had to fight against it. Of course, it very much helped their understanding that the Communist International, led by Georgi Dimitrov, was able to analyse the international class forces and promote the line of uniting all anti-fascist forces.

Hitler planned to use the opportunity to advance the interests of German imperialism at the expense of British, French and American imperialism, while at the same time increasing his stranglehold on the working-class movement. Spain was a heaven-sent opportunity for Hitler to advance his war preparations.

The response of the British ruling class was typical of 'Perfidious Albion' (as Britain is known). It was up to every possible trick. They did not want to get involved in the war, so they proclaimed it to be a civil war in which outsiders ought not to get involved. They supported 'non intervention', deliberately, closing their eyes to the intervention that was taking place in front of their noses on the part of Germany and Italy on Franco's side before, during and after the war The slogan of 'non-intervention was simply an excuse to avoid assisting the democratically-elected Republican government and preventing it from buying the guns it needed to defend itself from fascism and its interventionist backers. So what happened?

In North Africa was stationed the Army of Africa. This army had considerable experience of war. The generals were in Spain, so that between them and the army lay the straits of Gibraltar. The Spanish Navy was on the. side of the Republic. Franco needed to get his troops across the water. Within 3 days the German Nazi Air Force provided all the air transport needed to ferry the Army of Africa into Republican Spain. The result was a 3-year long war, which would never have taken place if the 'non-interventionists' had prevented the fascists' intervention and had given the Republican government the right to buy the arms it needed.

Franco began to advance from Seville towards Madrid, the capital. What were the tasks of the Popular Front government? It had no army, because the Spanish army had gone over to Franco. It had men of enormous courage and conviction, but no military training. So the Republican government had to train up an army while at the same time Franco, helped by the Nazis, was already advancing from the South towards Madrid.

To counter this advance what was needed was (a) organisation, and (b) weapons. Franco incidentally secured his rear, as he advanced up towards Madrid, by the ruthless murder of everybody who opposed him. He murdered all the landless peas-ants who had taken over land in the South. In this way he was able to take over half of Spain in 3 months, leaving behind him a trail of death and destruction.

If Madrid had fallen the war would have been over and yet another country would have been in the fascist camp. This would have reinforced the idea that nothing could be done to prevent the advance of fascism. But Franco's troops were stopped by the heroic people of Spain, untrained and poorly armed though they were. The people of Madrid knew what fate awaited them if Madrid had fallen, and this strengthened their determination to stop fascism. Their victory over the fascists was a turning point of the war. Because of this victory, in October 1936, the Republican government was able to fight on until March 1939.

Those two and a half years gave the democratic people of the world the opportunity to learn lessons as to the true nature of fascism, to understand what it meant, and to prepare for the fight against fascism that began in 1939.

The International Brigade

Who were the International Brigade? All over the world, men and women felt that they could not stand aside while a democratically-elected government was simply forced out of power at gunpoint. People went to the aid of Spain from all over the world, from 40 to 50 countries. They decided to fight in Spain on the side of the Spanish people.

They were driven by a realisation that if fascism was not stopped in Spain, war and fascism could come to their own countries as well The volunteers were also concerned about their own families and their own futures, their peace and their liberty.

A few words about the people who came from Britain. We were called the Battalion Ingles (the English battalion) even though this included people from the Commonwealth, to say nothing of other parts of Britain. In the fight to defend Madrid, the British battalion played an important part. Later, between 12-14 February 1937, at Jarama, it had the job, alongside others, of stopping-of stopping the tremendous force armed by the Germans and Italians. A four-day battle took place. 16l of us were killed and nearly everyone was injured. But the enemy did not pass. They did not pass. We always mark that day because it was the first battle in which we fought. We stopped Franco's attempt to swing round and cut off Madrid from the rest of Republican Spain. I would like to mention in passing the Italian battalion of the International Brigade, the Garibaldi Battalion: - they knocked hell out of Mussolini's troops!

The heroism of the people- of Spain was beyond compare. So short of equipment were they, that the fighters from Madrid used to go to the Front in tram-cars. Their ability to hold out for so long against such overwhelming odds provides an important lesson of the power of the people when united to fight for a just cause.

Loach's film

To return to Ken Loach's film, it is clear from all I have said that by far the most important front at the time the events in his film supposedly take place was the Madrid front. Why did he not make a film about that? Why did he not portray the exceptional heroism of the people of Madrid as German shells fell all around them? That would have been a film worth making.

Instead he went to a remote village in Aragon, miles away from the decisive front. The events in that part of Spain revolved round Barcelona. In Barcelona, at the time that the fascist generals rose against the republic, the people stormed the barracks and took over the city. Having thus secured their position, they should then have gone out from Barcelona to give support to those fighting the advancing Franco troops. But this they did not do because of the anarchistic and POUM leadership. They did not fight at all. Loach decided to make his film at what was, in effect, a dormant front. During the events which occurred in Barcelona and which were depicted in the film, Franco was marching North to try to take Madrid, and the Nazis were preparing World War II. They were bombing Guernica so that they could assess the effect of mass bombing on a civilian population. You would never have known that from seeing this film.

Yet it is important to see the events depicted in the film within that context. In Barcelona, while the grim struggle was going on elsewhere, they had decided to stop fighting and to initiate collectivisation. They did not want to organise a disciplined army. They did not understand the need for one. Frankly, the scene where the arguments are taking place about collectivisation is quite pathetic when you remember the fate of the collectivised peasants of the South of Spain who had been wiped out by Franco in the early days of his advance. It is obvious that the order of the day was to stop Franco, and unless and until that had been done all talk of collectivisation was futile.

Where did Ken Loach get his ideas from?

Not from the 2,400 or so people who went to Spain from Britain to fight in the international brigades. It was illegal at that time to go to Spain to fight, because of the Non-Intervention treaty. What one had to do was to go to Paris on a non-passport trip, and then make one's way to Spain from there. Because of this illegality, it was impossible to know exactly how many British people went to fight in Spain, but the approximate number is 2400. 526 of these were killed. Who were these people? In the early days they were mainly writers and artists who realised that fascism was a threat to culture, because they knew that Hitler had been burning books. These people also had the know-how to get out of Britain and get to Spain. It was only later on that miners, dockers, and generally the cream of British industrial workers went out. They were joined by people who were fighting against British imperialism -27 from Cyprus, of whom nearly half were killed in Spain, and 120 from the Republic of Ireland. Nurses and doctors went because fascism had to be defeated first before the Spanish people could make up their minds as to what kind of government they wanted. A socialist revolution was not at that moment on their agenda. Ken Loach has, therefore, confused the issue, and his film has no relation to reality. This is why the true picture must be shown.

Why did the Spanish people lose?

The main reason was those who enforced the policy of 'non-intervention'. Our slogan Save Spain & Save Peace was correct. If help had been given to the Spanish Republic by the government of this country, if the movement had been strong enough to defeat the fascists, then World War II would not have happened.

Another of Loach's slanders is as to the role of the Soviet Union The Soviet Union wanted peace. For a short time, therefore, they went along with non-intervention until they saw the reality of this 'non-intervention' whereupon they decided they had a responsibility towards the democratic, peace-loving people of Spain. They sent help in the form of arms and food, and they gave every possible help to the Spanish people.

What was the role of the Soviet people who went to Spain? Ken Loach says they were murderers acting under Stalin's instructions. Well, I got given a Soviet anti-tank gun. A Soviet instructor showed us what to do with it. We were given Soviet rifles and he instructed us how to use them. While the German planes which were involved in supporting Franco were piloted by German pilots, Soviet instructors taught Spanish lads as airmen. Others were taught to drive tanks.

In addition the Soviet Union suffered great losses in under to help Spain. Its ships were bombed by Italian planes and sunk by German submarines. Some people think that the Soviet Union should have done more, not realising how much the Soviet Union actually did. Much of what it sent never arrived at its destination because of the activities not only of the German and Italian fascists, but also because of the activities of the 'non-interventionists', such as France, who prevented supplies destined for Spain from crossing French territory. In my opinion the Soviet Union did all that was humanly possible to do in the conditions prevailing at that time.

Why has Loach been given so much money to make such a film? Why is Orwell being taught in the schools as if he were a great author? It can only be that the ruling circles in imperialist countries want to lower people's vigilance against fascism.

If you are going to fight fascism you have to realise that it is fascism you fight at that time. You do not fight several other battles simultaneously if that can be avoided.

The second lesson of the Spanish Civil War is that you do have to fight, even if there is a possibility of losing. You may lose, but if you do not fight at the very first signs of fascism you will definitely lose

reply

*beep* off with that Stalinist *beep*

1 bullet, 1 Stalinist should be the new way for anarchists.

reply

Hahahahaha! And WE "Stalinists" are supposed to be the violent ones! Spoken like a true anarcho-fart -- hypocrite!

reply

Thanks for keeping it short.
How is that White Sea canal getting on,is it finished yet?

reply

Completely finished; as is the literacy campaign, electrification of the villages, vaccination of children, the opening of primary, secondary, vocational and higher schools and colleges. Oh, and the total defeat of Nazi Germany, too.

reply

It was an ironic comment.
You don't seem to know that the White Sea Canal project was a complete failure,it killed thousands of slave labourers (in a worker's state?)it was too narrow to take any useful shipping.

It is a symbol of what was wrong with the communist system.

Leaving aside the mass murder,lack of freedom and corruption the Soviet Union was an ally of Nazi Germany until 22 June 1941 when Germany attacked the USSR.
Some of the petrol in the planes that bombed my parents in Britain in 1940 came from Russia,Germany also imported coal and other raw materials.

Of course the USSR contributed greatly to the defeat if nazi Germany but Soviet policy helped create the problem in the first place.

I visited the USSR and East Germany and communist Poland,you could see they were evil and bckward places.
Even the western communists I was with were surprised how bad things were.

reply

I'm fully aware of your "irony."

No, Soviet Russia was not an "ally" of Nazi Germany, the had a Non-Aggression agreement. So did Czechoslovakia, and Poland, and your country (I assume) Britain. What? Never heard of the German/British Naval agreement Hitler sugned with your country? Don't be a Hypocrite, especially not on the message board for this particular film: Most of the British pplitical class, including Churchill, actively supported Franco.

Soviet Russia helped create Nazi Germany? Sorry, you don't get off the hook that easy. For ten years the Soviets desperately tried to pursue a policy of "Collective Security" against Hitler's Germany only to get rebuffed by the likes of Chamberlain, Halifax. Eden and company. Let's rmemeber who it was who sold out the Rhineland, the Saar, Austria, and Czechoslovakia; and whi it was who watched by as Germany re-armed and prepared for war. In short, APPEASEMENT is an English, not Russian term.

The Soviet Union did not "contribute greatly to the defeat of Nazi Germany -- IT DEFEATED NAZI GERMANY. The USSR took the full fury of German agression for three years, while not a single British or American soldier stood on European soil. In fact, for every one division the Germans had in the West, they had 10 in the East. World War II was won at Stalingrad, not Normandy.

As for East Germany and communist Poland being "evil and backward"? What can one say to such a subjective, moralistic judgement call. Advanced education, and social welfare and service programs, evail and backward? OK, as you wish. Howvwer, there are 100s of thousands of Germans and Poles who disagree with you today. And also, that, so long as we're being moralistic and judgemental, take a look at Brixton and Whitechapel -- not to mention Harlem, Oakland, and the South Side of Chicago -- before you call places evil and backward.

reply

Of course the USSR was an ally of nazi Germany,Stalin was somehow fooled into thinking that Germany would never attack the USSR.

Stalin had weakened the Soviet military by killing or jailing thousands of his own officers.
Even on the day of the nazi invasion Stalin did not properly organise the nation's defence cause he could not believe that he was really under attack.

I know about appeasement ,it is I think you will find originally a French term,but anyway the world's understanding of the term has moved on from the way you use it,the idea that Britain and France did nothing to rearm while Hitler built up his forces is not one fully supported by the evidence.
While Britain was supposed to be playing cricket and drinking tea with fascists the government was busy building aircraft factories,airfields and putting up the money for radar development and planes such as Spitfires and Hurricanes,so Britain was preparing for war in private while in public people talked about peace.

We know about the Russia won the war angle,it has been an touted as an amazing fact for 30 years at least.
I would never underestimate the role of the USSR in world war 11 but you have to look at the whole picture,the huge Soviet losses were partly due to bad Soviet leadership and terrible treatment of their own people.
Even as the war raged the USSR had enough resources to jail and kill thousands of its own people.

You do not mention the thousands of tons of supplies supplied to the USSR by Britain and America,America supplied millions of shoes and boots and thousands of trucks and tanks,it was an allied victory.

I think you will find that Britain and the rest of europe faced nazi aggression from September 1939-June 1941,you have heard of the Battle of Britain,the bombing of Britain and the battle of the Atlantic?



The fact is that each country fight's fot its self,the USSR did not fight to save Britain or free France.


I visited East Germany,Poland and Russia when they were under communist rule,I did not see lots of happy people,I did see lots of clean impressive buildings,I did see people wanting to buy western clothes from me,I did see police outside hotels to stop tourists mixing freely with tourists,I did see hard currency shops where tourists and party members could but luxury goods,I saw empty shops,coffee was not available in Leningrad when I was there in 1987.
Of course you ignore the fact of the fact that people could not just leave the eastern bloc if they were unhappy.

I recall the son of the Prime Minister of Poland leaving to live in America,the shipyard workers of Poland asked the PM if his son could not make a good life in communist poland what chance did an ordinary worker have?

You come out with the cold war cliches about poor people in the west,of course there were and are poor people in the west but they were better off than the poor in the east,they did not have internal passports,they did not become unpersons and dissapear into the gulag.

I have been to Harlem and Brixton,I live in a poor part of my city,but you can't compare,go to your library,look for a book called A WORKER IN A WORKER'S STATE,which exposed in the 1970s the way the USSR treated ordinary people.

Many people were seduced by the Soviet myth when it was alive,I was surprised that anybody still believes in it,I am a 47 year old British person,a history graduate,my parents met at a communist party dance,so I have heard all the stuff about the USSR before,I think the facts show it to have been a disaster,you don't have to be a right winger to believe that,read some George Orwell essays.

reply

>read some George Orwell essays

The cure for lots of evils, sez I. Including stewed and nasty tea. One of the greatest authors of 20C with still definitive works on communism and the intrusiveness of the totalitarian state on private lives.

WW2 was won with American money and Russian blood, so the cliché goes. Turn that coin over and it says on the back that WW2 was won by the Atlantic Merchant Marine and the codebreakers in Bletchley Park.

How did all that American money get to Europe and where did all the food and ammunition the Russian Army consumed come from? Who staffed the Baltic convoys and how were they kept away from submarines? And how did Stalin know where Paulus was or get the detailed German deployments at the Battle of Kursk?

History is a complex tapestry and the threads aren't just black and white. Or red.

reply

You're right. I agree with your comment sir.

reply

Is that the same George Orwell who was an informer?

These days I'm inclined to the view that we underestimate the war effort of the British empire (all 500 million of them) at our historiographical peril. The U-boat "peril" was defeated in mid-1943 which was just about when the supply route through Iran began to operate.

Marlon, Claudia and Dimby the cats 1989-2005, 2007 and 2010.

reply

You should try thinking for yourself instead of spouting the party line. You might even learn something ...

reply

"You should try thinking for yourself instead of spouting the party line. You might even learn something ... "

What party? Or would it make you happier if I adopted the anarchist/trotskyist "line"?

"This nut thinks he's a vampire!"
THE NIGHT STALKER

reply

"The bourgeois ideological offensive taking place at the present time explains the £2.5 million supplied to Ken Loach from some very dubious quarters to enable him to make the film Land and Freedom, which so glorifies certain Anarchist factions which acted in a counter-revolutionary fashion during the Spanish Civil War, and which so denigrates the real heroes of that war."

I see the same in-fighting that crippled the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War is alive and kicking today. The real question is: does anyone outside the 'Revolution' care?

When darkness overcomes the heart, Lil' Slugger appears...

reply

It's only "in-fighting" if you consider the anarchists as part of the Republican war effort, which they themselves did not. It's not for nothing that many in Spain, even today, call the anarchists the "FAI-lange." As for anyone outside "the Revolution" caringing? I think anyone who is opposed to fascism cares a great deal. The issues are still very much alive today.


"This nut thinks he's a vampire!"
THE NIGHT STALKER

reply

Great article. It's tragic the way the history of this has been perverted by anarchists and Trotskyists, with of course all possible help given to them by the capitalists, due to their shared aim of vilifying and discrediting the Soviet Union and Marxism-Leninism, the only thing that has ever presented a serious challenge to the capitalist system.

Do you know of any good literature to recommend on this subject?

reply