MovieChat Forums > Screamers (1996) Discussion > Criminally Underrated

Criminally Underrated


This movie's origins has a pretty strong foundation; based on a short story by Philip K. Dick and written for the screen by Dan O'Bannon. The budget and production value is about what you'd expect from a 1995 science fiction film headlined by Peter Weller, but it doesn't detract from the story and characterization, which is solid. The ending gets a bit convoluted, but it well illustrates the fact that Weller's character was indeed ALONE on that planet, which is a common theme in most of Dick's works.

I thought it was going to be a low rent rip off of Tremors, but it's actually much better.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2uOzV4glRs

reply

Yeah this movie is awesome.

reply

It has one of the better science fiction-existential-horror endings of any science fiction movie and a great mood throughout.

The budget and production value is about what you'd expect from a 1995 science fiction film headlined by Peter Weller, but it doesn't detract from the story and characterization, which is solid.


That seems kind of paradoxical -- the RoboCop pictures did well, combined they grossed $100 million, half of which was profit based on cost/gross and probably even more with VHS factored in, and Weller had done a Woody Allen film between this and Robocop, so he wasn't *just* a science fiction throwaway like Michael Biehn.

Although it looks like Screamers had one of those weird, patchwork B-movie production company structures, so maybe that had something to do with it.

reply

I like it enough to watch it every 5 years or so. A nice little sci-fi film with a good atmosphere, good characters (a bit one-dimensional but that suits the depressing situation) and enough going on to be interesting.

reply

yes.

reply

Agreed.

reply

yaa besides some silly parts that didnt age well this scared me as a child, then still held up when I rewatched it later

reply