MovieChat Forums > Safe (1995) Discussion > Question about the mysterious 'staggerin...

Question about the mysterious 'staggering' man


I have a question on the frail figure seen staggering around the camp? He is mentioned very briefly during a conversation between Carol and the camp counsellor and is seen again crossing a field after the group discussion:

Who is he, what is wrong with him, how did he get that way, and what does he represent?

When looking on the Wikipedia entry for the film, the movie poster featured there shows what I believe to be a close-up of this figure, as the scene does not appear anywhere else in the film, and none of the other characters wear such clothing. Can anyone shed any light on who the figure is and what he represents? Is he a symbol of where Carol is headed? Does anyone have any additional information or explanantion, as I thought the mysterious figure was not very clearly explained in the film.
Thanks

reply

He *could* be a symbol of where Carol will end up, but I think Nell's husband (who died in the igloo) is possibly another future for her.

The man is just "afraid of everything" - what he eats, the air, the outdoors etc. - I don't think he has any specific illness, but is just an extreme example of the others at the camp.

reply

He's also my favourite character to impersonate after a few beers at parties.

"Hey guys... anyone seen that movie 'SAFE' ??? ...Check THIS out!!"

[Seriously though i loved the film from start to finish. :-)]

reply

Ah, that made me laugh:)

Good question tho, pretty Lynchian character roaming about.

It seemed to have more of an instinctive effect on me. He was kind of this lame disjointed animal that did not belong in these surroundings. The scene ends with a coyote in the distance looking at these people.

reply

Totally a Lynch-type concoction. The way he walked also reminded me of the guy with eyes in his hands from Pan's Labyrinth. And I like your image of him as a "lame animal;" all the people at Wrenwood are lame in this respect, though certainly in varying degrees. As I remember, Lester is "afraid to eat, afraid to breathe..."; basically he's one of these poor products of the 20th century who have been made too fragile by the fabricated world of people, and evolutionarily shouldn't even be alive. The coyote serves as a reminder of the natural order of things, the animal nature that the world outside Wrenwood and within it deny. Dunning's new-agey philosophy about blind love and harmony with nature refuses to acknowledge the savage, dog-eat-dog reality of life, and therefore further cripples these people, forcing them to a state of "bubble boy" (or girl - "bubble person") helplessness that they remain in until they die (or can no longer pay? The financial issue is hinted at with Dunning's huge house, but I don't know how the money thing would work there).

reply

Hey, post it on youtube, I'd love to see your rendition

reply

For me, Lester is a very unsettling character. His movements are frightening (I wonder if the actor put stones in his shoes to get that effect?)

Lester and Dunning both strike an absurd posture in the film! Lester appears on two occasions, and on each of them, Peter Dunning, founder (and chief beneficiary) of Wrenwood, is dispensing some... wisdom to Carol(on the first occasion to Carol personally, and on the second to Carol as part of a group in which he gives some highly dubious opinions on the causes of physical illness). Perhaps Lester is an in-your-face to Dunning's philosophy, or even a warning to Carol about how seriously she should take Dunning's opinions about routes to sound mental and physical health.

When the world presents us with evidence that our opinions might be incorrect, you would think that this would change our opinions, but it has been found that what actually happens is that we try to change the world to fit and even strengthen our opinion instead. Claire, the Wrenwood Director, is more aware of the importance of tailoring the approach to the individual than Dunning seems to be. Lester should be a signal to Dunning that perhaps Wrenwood does not fit everyone. Instead, Dunning turns him into another example to support his existing view that physical illness is the fault of the individual. Dunning himself is full of hypocritical contradictions about the nature of shame and blame. Lester provides a physical manifestation of this absurdity.

reply

he is very frightening, I remember not being able to sleep after watching the movie with the image of that strangely walking man in my head...

whats strange about the DVD cover is that the person in the picture is certainly androgynous, possibly a woman, and i think it is an image of Carol having turned into Lester, never having gotten any better...I could be wrong though.

reply

I took it to be Carol's ultimate fate as well.

--------
See a list of my favourite films here: http://www.flickchart.com/slackerinc

reply

He ("Lester") was originally the only image on the posters and publicity for the film, (http://www.musicafilm.it/dvd-film/safe-sicura.html) but certainly didn't help to sell an already difficult film with such a confusing and off-putting figure, so the DVD release has a close-up of Julianne Moore; it's better than the VHS release, which actually had an image of Julianne Moore smiling and sort-of laughing, which I don't think was even taken from the film! It's perversely interesting to see how the film industry, even the "indie" side, desperately tries to sell something essentially un-sell-able . . .

I agree with all the different perspectives and interpretations of "Lester" (quotation marks because he's hardly a character, but more of an idea or intersection of ideas). I think the costume totally removes any sense of identity or individuality; the stripes seems to visually increase the idea of him as a graphic symbol rather than human character; and the black and white stripes makes him stand out starkly from the "natural" environs of Wrenwood. His stumbling is frightening, pathetic and totally ridiculous, even hilarious, which is how every character in the film is presented, and the tone of the film itself. (Watching it in the theater my friend and I were cracking up the whole way through, to the confusion of the small group of other patrons. Some, atlhough not all, of Carol's "attacks" are quite absurd and overblown--the parking garage, the hairdressers, etc.--and throwing up on her husband when he takes her in his arms to comfort her . . . speaks for itself.)

Dont' forget that when Carol asks Peter Dunning, the founder of Wrenwood, about Lester, Peter basically says, "Oh, that's just Lester, don't pay him any mind, he's just a lost cause," yet another of a hundred signals to get the hell out of Wrenwood, which Carol is simply too unformed as an entity to hear and consider (starting with "Go back! Go back!" being the first words we and Carol hear at her arrival there). As a cautionary tale, which I think the film is, I agree that Lester is where Carol will be if she continues down the same path. And the color white connects Carol (her name, race, and her one vice, "milk"), Lester, and the interior/exterior of her "pod" or whatever her cave/cell is called at the end of the film.

Lots more to say of course, being a Haynes film, and really his most perfect one, his masterpiece, at that.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]


Thanks for such a great reading of Lester. This is exactly what I was looking for!!

reply