MovieChat Forums > Sabrina (1995) Discussion > When compared without sentimentality -- ...

When compared without sentimentality -- remake's just better


Some friends and I thought it would be fun to watch both Sabrinas in a double-header last weekend, to finally see which we liked better.

The verdict? While we were all a little hesitant to admit it at first, all four of us admitted to finding the 1995 remake with Ford and Ormond more fun, and ultimately a better movie.

Which makes me wonder how many of the people posting angrily about this movie toward those who love the new version better have actually (1) seen the original, and (2) let go of sentimentality when it comes to that cast to judge the old one fairly. (And please note, if you have, and you simply like the old one better, to each his own -- more power to ya.)

But, for me, looking at the original objectively, it's often surprisingly humorless and sexist. And while yes, that was a product of the times to an extent, it's that much more welcome to see Sabrina flourish in the remake as a much stronger and more independent woman. And while this does not mean I don't adore Audrey Hepburn, or Holden, or Bogart, I just never saw sparks with Bogart and Hepburn at all (or Hepburn and Holden, for that matter). I do see them in the remake, with both Ormond's leading men.

I also just find myself disliking Sabrina as a character in the old one. She's willing to kill herself for this jerk, and actually attempts it(!), and is then sent off to learn how to cook and (it's implied) clean and be a good little wifey. I don't think the attempted suicide scene is funny at all and it's very uncomfortable to watch -- and I really hate that even in her big scene near the end with Bogart, she is COOKING for him -- acting as servant, not as equal.

Whereas I love the 1995 cast, I adore Ormond and her chemistry with Ford, and I like that Sabrina is so much stronger and more interesting a character in this one. One of my favorite hallmarks of this in the new one is how she talks about the poem behind her name, and Linus kind of sneers, "Oh, about your little poem..." thinking she was named for the maiden in distress -- but no, as Sabrina replies -- she was named for the heroine who saved her. It adds yet another layer to Sabrina, who may have been a damsel in distress in the original -- but in the remake she is actually the one trying to save Linus from himself (and from a loveless, cold life).

I also think that it's much funnier than the original. Nancy Marchand is awesome in every single one of her scenes. And when Greg Kinnear sits on the glasses, or drools all over Sabrina's hand when he's on meds, or when the secretary says she packed Linus's underwear drawer ("It was like touching the shroud of Turin!") -- we all laughed out loud.

So yeah I'm one of those who feels -- absolutely -- that Sabrina not only did justice to the original, but that honestly the remake was frothier, funnier, and more romantic than the original. (ducks to avoid flying tomatoes!)

Oh, and R.I.P. Sydney Pollack. He made a wonderful film.

reply

You had a lovely movie showing of your own.

I do not think I ever liked the original better than the remake. I guess I'll get a bunch of ripe tomatoes thrown at me myself.

All good points and written very nicely.

Let me add my two cents: And The Soundtrack is great for the remake. One of my most favorite.

-----
GET PERSONAL -- GET GEEKED
R.I.P Daisy

reply

Awesome! And thank you! Especially since, yes, I was ducking to avoid flying vegetables for this opinion.

I love the soundtrack too, which is honestly much more fairy-tale and dreamlike and in keeping with Sabrina's opening voiceover (to me) than the original's soundtrack.

I know many many will disagree, and that's cool with me. I just wanted to throw out there that -- MAYBE -- people are just so married to the idea that the original is always always better (not to mention with wonderful folks like Hepburn, Bogart and Holden) that this must not be questioned.

When, as a screenwriter and former film student, I totally question it. I've seen some amazing movies from the last 70-80 years but honestly remakes never bugged me anyway. Most suck. BUT. Those that don't seem to manage to illuminate or rethink the material. It's definitely an uphill slog for the new folks to do justice to a masterpiece.

So I do admit to adoring Sabrina (1995) -- I remember Pollack on "Inside the Actor's Studio," and when an audience member spoke up and said she heard he was remaking Sabrina, she just wanted him to know it was her favorite movie in the world. As I remember, his response was very cute -- basically, "I hope you like what I do but you scare the crap out of me."

When it comes to remakes, for me anyway, there is always a place for both points of view. I'm so glad they remade Sabrina because the second is my preference, and was made by a master filmmaker. I also (as an unabashed Ormond fan) love the fact that you can see her Sabrina thinking and evolving in almost every frame of her scenes. She begins as a silly kid, but only by the end understands real life, and to that extent is ultimately strong enough to survive Linus's cruel trick -- and to do so with a grace and kindness that most people would be unable to attain. She simply says, "You would have been happy too." She knows what he has lost. This makes the ending even sweeter.

But meanwhile the original is lovely and will always exist for those that love it best.

Cheers!

reply

As you said, generally speaking the classics are said to be better, but we're in a world where people will remake just about anything they feel like. It happened to balance out if not entirely work better for this remake which is a win-win siutation.

Sometimes it's worth some people to mix it up a bit. Go with how they feel and what they feel. If no one liked the remake then that'd be pretty sad considering it was a good movie, too. And well, you're here. I'm here.

I've never seen Pollack on "Inside the Actor's Studio", but that was a funny reply. I think he did just fine.

I think what I personally enjoy the most about the remake is the humor. I'm presonally not big on Romantic Comedies, nor do I exactly like that term, and it's true I am a huge Ford fan, but--the movie is just fun and it's funny. I don't think I ever let the fairytale element process fully or did I let the romantic element process fully. I think being able to just see Sabrina as a movie is what let me know that Pollack did a good job.

The only thing that sticks out about the original and remake that I most likely never will change is my love for Linus. In both versions he still remains my most favorite character.

On another note, interesting you are a screenwriter and a former film student. I just started film school last spring.

And back to it,

But meanwhile the original is lovely and will always exist for those that love it best.


Indeed. And to this I also add, the original and remake will always exist for those real gals named Sabrina...like me.


-----
GET PERSONAL -- GET GEEKED
R.I.P Daisy

reply

[deleted]

YES!!! I agree with everything you've said. You explained it very well. I watched both versions and I didn't enjoy the original much at all.

-----------------------------
THIS is from Congo Jack!

reply

Thanks very much for this! I like the people in the original so much... I think it's easier sometimes to assume, "Oh, the original must be better," when honestly, sometimes that's just not the case.

I really love Audrey and Bogey and Holden, but in this case I never remotely bought Audrey's attraction to either one, while in the remake, both Kinnear and Ford are freaking adorable, and Ormond is picture-perfect as Sabrina.

I especially love in the remake the way they are able to balance Sabrina as a kind of naif-innocent (her crush on Linus's brother) with her as an also very wise person who has discovered who she is. What I really like there is that finding out who you are gives you an enormous foundation -- she is not worldly or experienced yet she is somehow formidable and armed because of her time in Paris, not because it is so awesome (although it is) but because she has found the answers in life she needed. Most people don't slow down long enough to do so.

It's a lovely, lovely movie and I am so glad they remade it. I always loved Julia Ormond's long hair and was horrified to hear she cut it for the film but of course it's absolutely adorable here and is certainly a nice visual reflection of her coming of age. It's a vastly underrated, light, sweet film. Right down to Sabrina's father's own love story.

reply

Definitely. I loved this movie (the remake). ;) And I agree with you on the soundtrack, espcially Sting's song In the Moonlight - just beautiful. I want to watch it again, come to think of it! I need it on DVD now, though. I still have just the VHS.

-----------------------------
THIS is from Congo Jack!

reply

I feel like I'm making some horrible betrayal! I've got to start off by saying that Audrey Hepburn is my idol. I'm not one to be a huge fan of film stars, but Audrey is basically the only female celebrity whose tips, lifestyle, fashion sense and philosophy I follow almost religiously. So the original Sabrina is one of my all time favourite films. Not only is it directed by Billy Wilder, but it also stars Humphrey Bogart and William Holden, who are two of my all time favourite actors (even if they didn't get along..).

That being said - I completely agree with you about the '95 Sabrina being superior in many ways to the original. I was very surprised when I saw it, I thought I'd hate it - but I wound up thinking how extremely underrated it is. I prefer Audrey's Sabrina, but some of the character injected into Julia's Sabrina made her a much better match for Linus (such as the scene when she slaps him in the greenhouse). I always had the feeling that after the original Sabrina ended and Bogie and Audrey reached Paris, eventually that romance simply wouldn't work because of the massive gap in maturity. Bogie's Linus is incredibly world weary, cynical and beaten (although I loved that), and Audrey's Sabrina is so innocent and spirited.

I think that if only Harrison Ford could have time traveled back to the 50's with that characterization of Linus, or Audrey was born a few decades later to enjoy stronger female characters on screen (along with Bill Holden - TBH, I don't think Greg Kinnear came close to matching him), you'd have a perfect film. :)

reply

Very well written! I agree with you on many levels. One thing that was hard for me to take was the obvious age difference between Sabrina and Linus in the original version. Bogart was quite clearly much older than Hepburn, and it kind of took away the believablity for me. Although there is an age difference in the remake, it does not appear to be such a large gap, in part due to Sabrina's independance, also because Harrison Ford is...well...Harrison Ford! Greg Kinnear was the perfect contrast to Linus' stuffiness, but had his own charm as well and came into his own by the end.

I also agree that we get more of a sense of WHY Linus is the way he is in this one, family pressures, etc. We see that he is living a safe, but lonely, life. This is also why I adore the Cinderella movie "Ever After" with Drew Barrymore so well. Anjelica Huston gives such a depth to the "evil stepmother" character, and we learn what life experiences have helped make her such.

I enjoy both movies, but I think I also like the remake better!

reply

1995 Sabrina is one of my guilty pleasures. I love that version: it is very funny, romantic and a fairy tale that doesn't take itself too seriously. I love Audrey Hepburn but yes, objectively, 1995 Sabrina is a lot more fun.

reply

Your explanation was very well written and I completely agree with you. I must say I first saw the remake, and was completely in love with it. When I learned that it was a remake (and of a Billy Wilder`s movie!!!) I decided that I had to see the original, because, in my mind, it would surely be much better.

But, unfortunately, for me, the original movie was a disappointment. I it to be sexist (yes, I am considering the time it was made), and not really funny. The new Sabrina is such an stronger a person. Her story is much more powerful and convincing.

I also love Fanny Ardant`s character. It was such an interesting and charming addition to the movie. And the Linnus`mother...she was simply fantastic. In fact, there is nothing in the original that I find superior to the remake (and believe me, I do tend to hate remakes).

Great movie. Definitely one of my guilty pleasures.

Regards

reply

Never saw the original but I read about the suicide scene and how it was left out of the remake. And I agree with you there.

Wilder read the script for the remake before filming and asked Sidney Pollack why it failed to include the suicide scene. Apparently Wilder was astounded at Pollack's response -- that the movie would otherwise be too long. Wilder was like, "What do you mean the picture's too long? The picture is the picture."

I would imagine Pollack was just being kind or coy and did not reveal the true reason, which is that suicide is not funny. Total buzz kill and psychological red flag for a character.

For a person to commit suicide, they've got to be sick or extremely, extremely troubled, and neither of those attributes are appealing in a love interest. Not really that sexy or alluring.

reply

As luck would have it, I saw Sabrina(1995) first and loved it! Then my wife asked me to watch the original! - Oh boy was I disappointed!

The original was:

a) not funny

b) not a romance

c) Bogart is simply not my idea of a leading man!

All in all, the original was dark.

The remake was just fun to watch. Enjoyed the actors and how they portrayed their parts and the music! A gem!

reply

I watched it again the other day after several years, and was charmed that I still love the 1995 version as much as I remembered. And I was reminded of another reason I love this version more than the 1950's version (as adorable as it was) -- the supporting characters are richer and are given more to do.

I can't think of a single supporting character here who isn't played by a fantastic actor, and the movie is filled with all these little moments that make the supporting characters seem like real people. Each seems to have an inner life and is played perfectly.

The Larrabees really seem like a family, and that's due to the wonderful presence of their mother, and the way Nancy Marchand brings so much humor and heart to her (like at her birthday, they tell her she has to go blow out the candles and she sighs, "Can't they just send someone?"). I love the scene when she's worrying about the situation -- not being a snob, she's not worried about David, she's worried about Sabrina,, to simply say, "Look, Sabrina, you're very lovely but David is going to end up yanking your chain and breaking your heart."

It's just nice that the emphasis is, time and again, on the Larrabees as pretty decent people at heart (fitting the fairytale feel). I also love her little moment at the end when Linus's scheme has apparently worked and she is tearful, telling him, "I never taught you this." It's that much more meaningful when, as Linus leaves for Paris, Ford does this lovely thing where he puts his hand on his mother's shoulder for a moment, and you know that all is forgiven, and that he is telling her she was right.

It's the same with almost all of the supporting characters. You get amazing people like *John Wood as Sabrina's Dad (who is just so warm and wonderful here -- so nice to see him play a good guy for once!), and Paul Giamatti, Becky Ann Baker, Miriam Colon, and more as the adorable servants (I love the moment when Becky Ann Baker is musing that Linus might be gay, and how that "makes [her] like him better"). It feels like there is a story to each of the household staff, like the little love story that's playing all the way through between Sabrina's Dad and the housekeeper ("Have you been watching 'Remains of the Day' again?").

I also love the fact that we get genuinely poignant moments in Paris (Fanny Ardant is impossibly beautiful and stylish, no wonder Sabrina is abashed), and then of course at Linus's office, Judith Ivey steals every scene she's in. The line, "We were up to our elbows in your underwear drawer -- it was like touching the Shroud of Turin!" will always make me laugh just thinking of it.)

I also have to give kudos to Greg Kinnear, who is very funny in a breezy way that's difficult to do, and to Harrison Ford, especially, who has this kind of desperation and loneliness at the end that is very believable and moving.

And Julia Ormond is just wonderful, and manages to play wise yet innocent in a believable way -- but then I've always found her so underrated. I thought she was just lovely here. I wouldn't begin to compare her to Audrey Hepburn -- I adored Hepburn but she manages to make Sabrina an interesting person in her own right here. For me, each brought something different to the role, and while Hepburn was timeless, I prefer Ormond's take on the character -- even as her heart breaks, she faces the situation honestly. She is a heroine, not someone to be deceived and set aside.

*NOTE: I was very sad at this past year's Oscars 'In Memoriam' segment, at the omission of Wood, who passed away last year -- he was a wonderful character actor who worked in literally dozens of films over several decades, and deserved to be mentioned. At least he was rightfully included by the BAFTAs.

reply

I agree wholeheardtedly, and I've spoken to several others that feel the same way!

reply

[deleted]

Great post. I definitely agree that some of my complaints about the original are simply a sign of times and social mores that have changed in the four decades since.

However, I do think it's an interesting thing to look at, because of the progression in Sabrina's character, if that makes sense. Sabrina is the savior in the poem and the savior of Linus in the modern version and it doesn't have to be couched in terms like how happy she'll make him or what a good cook she is. I like that a lot.

I think my main problem with the original, which is just lovely by the way -- so I'm not dissing it -- I'm just speaking of my personal preference -- is that not on any planet in our universe can I imagine that Audrey Hepburn and Humphrey Bogart are actually in love in the original.

I just see no sparks at all, ever, between the two of them. He seems so ill at ease in the entire movie, which is partly I think his often shy and lovely character interpretation, but it keeps me sort of detached from his character. I loved Bogart doing something beyond his usual tough guys, but for me his Linus remains such a cipher.

When with Ford, even though he was a total smarmy jerk for many scenes (and he revels in it -- I just love the smarmy way he says, "So about your little poem," like he's got it all figured out, how boring), it was like you could still see that he was just kind of giving in to all of it. I love the fact that he looks surprised by almost everything she says -- that's exactly what you want love to be like -- that you'll always find them interesting and fascinating.

It's like Linus says: "First it was a lie. Then it was a dream."

I adored Bogart, but in this particular case, I just couldn't see his Linus actually making a life with Sabrina. She seems like she lives on a soap bubble in that gorgeous young Audrey way of hers, while he just seems so much older and more tired.

The original is beautiful though, and I definitely see why you and many others love it so much.

Which is what's cool -- I know people hate remakes and get upset about them, but I'm always so interested, because you never know when a remake can surprise you and show you an utterly different interpretation. Sure, many of them suck. But every once in awhile magic happens, and you get two lovely interpretations of one story to ponder.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I keep thinking I'm a grownup, but I'm not."

reply

[deleted]