If the justice system works as it is supposed to (and, of course, it does not always), then after a competent and vigorous prosecution and a competent and vigorous defence, the guilty are found guilty of the correct crime (for example, manslaughter, rather than murder, in this case) and the innocent acquitted.
The US provides the forum for this contest because that is a function of our government. But its only interest (in theory) in the outcome is justice. If you accept the filmmaker's view in this case, then justice of a sort was done, and this was a victory, therefore, for the justice system as much as for justice itself and for Henri Young.
It is purely a convention that the case name in a federal criminal trial is the US v [name of defendant]. This does not mean that the United States (that is, we as a nation) "loses" if an innocent defendant is acquitted or a defendant is fairly found guilt of a lesser charge rather than unfairly found guilty of a greater charge.
There was therefore nothing in appropriate about the display of the US flag at the end of the case in this film.
reply
share