MovieChat Forums > Mr. Holland's Opus (1996) Discussion > An Unfocused Movie Until the Final Scene

An Unfocused Movie Until the Final Scene


Mr. Holland's Opus is, in some ways, a continuing saga of movies about teachers inspiring goof off kids. 1995 also saw Dangerous Minds with Michelle Pfeiffer do this, though she did it with a more focused plot and in the ghetto. The Opus movie takes place in the 60s, and proceeds to take us through decades of kids who can't play music that well, but are "inspired" by their somewhat muted teacher.

Dreyfuss was nominated for an Academy Award for this performance, though I think voters were more so touched by the final 10 minutes then by his acting overall. It's okay. I wasn't particularly overwhelmed with emotion, and this could be because the movie is way too long - and like another movie I just reviewed, Mermaids (1990, with Winona Ryder), has WAY too many subplots to keep up with. In this case, it's a class that hates classical music, on top of a cruel Principal (William H Macy), on top of a bland wife, on top of a deaf son, on top of- on top of. I just couldn't care as much because the scenes are drawn out, and the dialogue is a little flat. It reminded me of Music of the Heart (1999), with Meryl Streep playing the violin teacher in Harlem. The speeches she gets are sort of sub-par. There's no "Wow" moment.

Except the last 10 minutes. That was Wow. When we see one of Opus's former student's who struggled to play her oboe, suddenly appear in the auditorium as the Governor of the town. And to ask him to conduct one last time. Because the budgets are getting rid of the music program he was a part of for 30 years. That was good.

But the rest of the picture is a drawn out vanilla fest, that feels cramped and PG rated for sure. This deaf son business. That was a total letdown. The actor who plays him seems a bit out of sync. When Dreyfuss breaks the news to his son that John Lennon died, the son acts like its no big deal. It most certainly WAS a big deal. Shame on the son (and wife) for making Dreyfuss feel like a doofus for bringing this up.

There's also an affair that he has with one of his female students. She sings like she's on Broadway. One evening she beckons him to meet her at the bus station to go to New York. Together. He shows up, kisses her, and at the last minute backs out. "You pack light", she sobs. What a life he would have had if he had chose to go with her to more exciting pastures, then to stay in that hillbilly town that fires him after all those years of hard work.

What did Mr. Holland actually teach his students? The morals are not in full view. In an earlier scene he scolds the class for failing a music test. The students appear stupid and not very bright. But there's no closure. We never find out why they failed, or why they don't feel the need to try harder. We just skip to the next year and the next.

Overall this movie should have been trimmed by an hour and Ronald Bass, who penned movies like Stepmom and Braveheart, should have come to the writing table to help spice up the otherwise quiet dialogue.

FINALE GRADE: C-

reply

Good materiel, jason!

reply

[deleted]

Like all hypercritical people, you've fallen victim to hyperbole and not seeing the forrest for the trees. This is a fine (and nearly excellent) film about a character who goes through the motions of adult life that many other experience and can relate to. The fact that not everyone in the film relates to your set of values is part of what troubles you speaks more about you than the film. The idea that you think he had anything close to an affair with a student that had a crush on him also speaks more about you than the film.

reply

If the only thing you can take away from my long, detailed review is the student crush - you clearly are the one that has issues. It's called an OPINION. Let's see your review. You failed to write one, and instead criticized my very intense analysis. I know film history, and especially Oscar history. I dare you to take me on in the Oscar field. Try me. You're probably one of those Gaga fanboys that hopes she wins for wearing no Makeup. Sorry, Glenn is winning dear.

Oh- and Dreyfuss was NOT deserving of that nomination in 1995. His slot should have gone to John Travolta in Get Shorty, a Golden Globe winning performance no less. But apparently- comedy is not honored as being "as important" as drama. Unless you're in the rarity (like the superb Marisa Tomei in My Cousin Vinny, 1992).

Good day to you.

reply

LOL. You're a funny little guy. Thanks for the laughs.

reply

Little?? 5'5 is not little. I don't know if you saw my profile picture, but if you did- no, 5'5 is perfectly normal for a man in height. I'm mighty with words all day!

reply

it's a class that hates classical music, on top of a cruel Principal (William H Macy), on top of a bland wife... There's also an affair that he has with one of his female students.


Exaggerate much? Was Macy's character really "cruel" or simply misinformed and a little annoying? Was his wife really Bland? Not at all; she was winsome, lively and faithful.

As for the "affair," it never happened nor was it going to happen. Sure, Holland was inspired by Rowena's talent and flattered by her puppy love, but there was no chance that he was ever going to leave his family & career and run off to New York with her. It may have been a fun temptation to entertain during a mild midlife crisis, but he never took it serious; he wasn't dumb enough to do something that foolish. Holland met her at the bus stop simply to provide her a link to a safe place to stay in the big city and bid her farewell. The kiss was a mentor/student kiss, not a serious romantic kiss.

reply

Disagree thought it was a very good movie. Holland having to figure out how to reach Lou Russ and how to deal with his own son struck me. Both occurred before the public schools have to provide education to people with disabilities

Most people miss it bc so little is understood re disability history.

reply

[deleted]

Disagree thought it was a very good movie.


I thought it was good too; never said otherwise.

reply

When Dreyfuss breaks the news to his son that John Lennon died, the son acts like its no big deal. It most certainly WAS a big deal. Shame on the son (and wife) for making Dreyfuss feel like a doofus for bringing this up.

It may not have been a dig deal to him because, unlike most people, he couldn't actually listen to how moving the tone of the song was. (I give the wife a pass on the reaction since she was trying to calm her son from throwing another one of his temper tantrums.)

And don't forget, Cole really didn't understand the importance of John Lennon until Mr. Holland sang and gestured Beautiful Boy (Darling Boy) (1981) in the auditorium.

Could they have trimmed it down a bit? I suppose. I didn't particularly care for the story arc surrounding Mr. Holland having an attempted affair with his student (Rowena).

Otherwise, fantastic movie. I think it's one of the few that I can honestly say deserves the run-time of over 2 hours.

reply

Cole understood John Lennon but what was at play was that Mr. Holland and his son had years of non/miscommunication which had started when Mr, Holland first realized Cole was deaf and (unlike his wife) refused to learn ASL to communicate with him.

Cole had 'temper tantrums' earlier because he was frustrated not being able to talk to/with his very own family. He wanted to communicate with them too.

Cole then felt that his own father valued him less just because he was deaf. This is who he was and was supposed to be. Meanwhile his father was still trying to cling to oralism which did not recognize ASL as it's own language/culture.

Agree the affair was unneeded. We already knew that Mr. Holland is not a saint/has flaws (how he treats his own son).

reply