mighty sorvino


she steals the film from the beginning to the end...her voice is so funny,,,her face,,her dialogues...EVERYTHING....she mas amazing and powerfull. I think that the oscar for best s. actrees was the perfect way to rekognize the entire film...(rachel w.-the constant gardiner,,,angelina jolie-girl,interrupted,,,kim basinger-l.a. confidential)...in my opinion,,mira has been the best woody's lady....in second place...diane keaton ..i guess !!!

"sorry...my grammar is terrible"

reply

Her performance was magnificent, I'll give her that. Unfortunately, it doesn't change the fact that she isn't the most deserving nominee in the Supporting Actress category. In my opinion, Kate Winslet should have won the award for Sense and Sensibility.

reply

Unfortunately, it doesn't change the fact that she isn't the most deserving nominee in the Supporting Actress category.

She absolutely was, in my opinion.

----------
If you enjoy cinema, please check out my website @ FILMPIX.NET!

reply

I agree, she was what an actress is supposed to be.

reply

Kate Winslet was absolutely perfect in Sense and Sensibility. She played the role perfectly and her character was absolutely fabulous. That movie was absolutely fabulous. As for Mira Sorvino....I dont know...she did a good job at making Linda likeable and stupid but she got annoying to me after awhile...

"Everything is more beautiful because were doomed"

reply

It was a gimmick performance. She came up with weird nasal way of talking, and that's it.

reply

does she get naked in this film????



STEWIE: Never call them that again! It's Lois and the Fatman! Do you hear me?

reply

does she get naked in this film????

no.

anyway, winslet was ROBBED at the oscars. Sorvino was very good as the ditzy nasal- voiced woman in the film, but Kate's performance was nothing short of perfect.

still, i'm guessing that was Mira's only chance to win an oscar, whereas Kate will have many more opportunities


RIP Audrey Hepburn, I hope you are entertaining everyone up in heaven

reply

i'd submit that mira sorvino's acting job in "mighty aphrodite" is even more substantial than winslet's (a favourite of mine) precisely because linda is so different - especially with that campy, nasal voice. her actual voice and persona reek of cool confidence. in this "play" (with allen's use of the greek chorus), she has to bring all that out of linda.

gregory 021107

reply

with her this film would have been possibly the worst thing ever. but she breathed life into it. she carried the entire thing in my opinion. woody had some good ideas, eg greek chorus, deus ex machina, but at the end of the day linda ash is not only great as a ditzy slag with a heart but she transforms into a reasonably wholesome mother/wife. i'd go as far as saying it was one of the best performances i've ever seen in a woody allen movie (tied with judy davis in husbands and wives)

reply

the movie was CRAP. All her lines were was swearing and talking about sex. BORING!!!!!

reply

IMO, she was GREAT! she was HILARIOUS and she was PERFECT!

If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.

reply

I agree with the nay-sayers. Mira Sorvino STOLE that Oscar from the FAR more deserving Kate Winslet.

After Sorvino's first few lines, all I wanted to do was slap her character. She was SO ANNOYING! And Sorvino was better in Romy & Michelle's High School Reunion, hahaha (which isn't saying much).

But alas, her character DID make the movie less boring. =/

reply

Sorvino was marvelous in this film, winning a richly deserved Best Supporting Actress oscar...Woody created a genuine movie star here.

reply

But she honestly didn't do anything...

Eh, maybe I'm just nitpicking =/

reply

That's your opinion, please allow me mine.

reply

I didn't say you couldn't have yours...

I was just merely responding. I'm sorry if it was taken a different way than I meant.

reply

Oh, people who think their morals/character have to line up with those of the characters on screen in order to deem the actors' performances worthwhile...How much you have to learn! I thought she did an amazing job. Yes, her voice is annoying, yes she's a stupid prostitute, but it was played with such realism and heart that I couldn't help but love it. Not to mention she's schmokin' hot.

reply

Umm not at all. When did I say that a character had to have my morals to be considered a great performance? Why would creating a character who shared my morals make it a good performance? The two ideas are simply unrelated.

I thought she was very bland and monotonous. To me, her performance was nowhere near good enough to be honored with an Oscar.

reply

Yeah, look how long that star lasted.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

She's really sexy in this. Which is weird because I don't like the porn star/hooker/dancer/whatever look she goes for at various points. But she's just overwhelmingly sexy and puts on a brilliant performance.

-
Shuji Terayama forever.

reply

Gigantic, gorgeous and charming, Sorvino is PERFECT in this otherwise forgettable film.

As for Kate Winslet, she was good in Sense and Sensibility, but she did not elevate that film the way that Sorvino did Mighty Aphrodite.

reply

Agreed, and how many times are we going to see this story anyway (Sense and Sensibility).

reply