MovieChat Forums > Lord of Illusions (1995) Discussion > The use of CGI has dated this badly

The use of CGI has dated this badly


Although the not Barker's best effort, I quite like this film. It's a a horror with a noirish vibe like Angel Heart and there's not many movies that have tried this approach that I'm aware of.

Anyway, I do have one major criticism that almost took me out of the movie and that was the use of CGI effects in the house when (SPOILERS FOLLOW) a strange red spirit thing, who I believe is Nix appears and there's some terrible CGI thing floating about. It looks like it was created on hardware not much more advanced than a Playstation One. There are a few other weak uses of CGI too. It's a shame they didn't go practical for all FX and if necessary change the design of the effect of they couldn't achieve what they desired this way.

reply

a strange red spirit thing, who I believe is Nix appears


It is not Nix. Nix has not been resurrected yet. Dorothea thinks it is Nix, but it is actually Swann. Valentin opens the door after making a mysterious phone call after Harry and Dorothea go upstairs. Valentin is reporting to Swann, as he helped Swann fake his death and therefore knows how to get a hold of him. Swann sends the phantom in to scare off Harry. The phantom sends a fire snake to attack Harry, the same power that Swann uses later in the film when confronting Butterfield at the compound. Swann loves Dorothea, so when she touches the phantom, it does not harm her and instead departs.

Anyhow, I kind of like the effect of the red phantom, but what they call the "origami man" folding up into patterns does indeed look bad. It's not a bad concept, but I guess they just didn't have the money to do it as well as they could have back in 1995.

- - - - - - -
I am not a fan. I just happen to enjoy movies. Fans are embarrassing.

reply

I always thought it had a certain charm to it.

reply

The effects in that scene are bad, but those few seconds hardly ruin the movie.

http://www.hesaidshesaidreviewsite.com/

reply