Terrible name!


Does anyone have any insight into why the producers gave this movie such a terrible name? I always hate it when movies are marketed poorly, and it seems like both the name and marketing here were planned by someone who never saw the movie!

This is definitely a chick-flick, and a pretty good one. But I am sure way too many women pass as soon as they see the name, and way too many guys watched it hoping for something completely different.

reply

It truly was evil to name a movie as such, then not come through for us gents.

reply



"I can think of at least two things wrong with that title."

reply

Yeah. There weren't enough NUDE GIRLS!!!!!!!!!!!

reply

[deleted]

If you find Kim Cattrall in any way appealing, then your lack of female company is not a case of setting too high a standard. At least you've got that potential problem to cross off your list. =)

reply

[deleted]

Apparently, the producers knew what they were doing. That's why they are producers. It peeked you're interests, didn't it. You all sound like a bunch of horney teenagers.

reply

No, the name didn't "peek" my interest, nor did it "peak" my interest or even "pique" my interest. I saw the movie based on the featured actresses (it has quite a cast) and just couldn't believe the name. And I don't think I sounded like a "horney teen", but you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

reply

my bro said this movie was good. I'll see it some day if i ever fit it in.



"You think you know, what you are, what's to come,
U DUN EVIN GOT STURTED."

reply

I just downloaded this movie expecting something else, something I'm sure a few people have done.

You want to hear the funny thing? I did the same exact thing already a couple of years ago lol.

Damn you movie.

reply

It could be more internal than external, the "nude" part could be refereing to a raw openness rather than a state of undress.

Use Spoiler Tags! [spoiler]Herbert West/JFK 08!?[/spoiler]

reply

Did you wait around for the last shot after the credits?

reply

I don't think I did. What did I miss?

reply

They're all naked. But showing nothing.

I can see why it's titled that way, but let's be serious for a moment. The title of the move does write a cheque the film doesn't cash... I'm willing to bet the vast majority of interest in this movie came from horny men. The subtlety of the title is lost on anyone who hasn't seen the movie.

Apparently my signature defines who I am... so I made it just this

reply

I got it at blockbuster when I was young thinking, oooh naked ladies. actually, oooh naked women will be in this. or, oooh, next to the R rating it says graphic sexuality and nudity. anyway, point is i rented it expecting to see naked women. I didnt get much of that. I was happy to see the girl from manaquin acting again at the time, but then it turned into a gay movie. and i hated gay movies. i wanted to see naked ladies, not gay women with hairy armpits. so...i never did see the sexy naked women i wanted to, but, i watched it last night for the first time as a gay adult and i liked it! lol! the part when kim katrall gets with the greenpeace guy is the best.

reply

When I tuned into this movie, it was right when Kim Cattrall was in that terrific white thong outfit, looking like a million bucks. I was channel surfing, and of course, I stopped when I saw that. Then I figured that one guy must be gay, because he didn't do her, when she apparently really wanted him.

reply

I thought you were going to refer to Vaginal Davis.

"They sucked his brains out!"

reply

"reunion fantasies" or "there's nothing sexy about a nun".

reply