Almost Good


There's about as much right as there is wrong with this movie. A lot of folks here are looking at what's wrong. It's a stretch, but change a few things and you could have had a classic.

I think the first offender on watching is the score. The music is too awestruck, like everything the citizens of Mega City do is amazing. The music build up all the sites. However, to these characters it's just another day. Continuing through the film, the score attempts to singlehandedly deliver every emotion with the subtlety of a jackhammer.

Rob Schneider is totally pointless, an archaic comic relief piece. Common to have in the day, but no effort is made to give him a use.

There are scenes that come at a disconnect. When Dredd and friends enter the lab at the end, they go in through the head of the Statue of Liberty, but this is never established. After the dust settles there's a shot showing a hole in the statue with the audience confused as to how that came about. The clone situation is a non-starter with them just forgotten about. The whole solution to the plot comes about quick with little to it. The film basically needs another act.

I think the script has too many elements from the comics. They jammed too many locations and characters that made truncated subplots. First movie and already Dredd is removed as a judge! I mean that works as its own movie, but save the plot for a sequel. As is, so much of Judge Dredd sounds like Demolition Man. Toughest cop in the future deals with his mirror opposite, framed for crime, has female cop helping him, Rob Schneider is useless.

The effects are great, much better than many recent preceding films. Stallone looks great in the role, but was purportedly against keeping the helmet on. You look at how the recent Dredd flopped and understand that the average Joe sees movies on star power a d that a major draw won't hide their face for am entire movie, well you start to understand how things came to be here.

Running YouTube's Best Daily Vlog, Literally:

https://www.youtube.com/user/VaughnJogVlog

reply

[deleted]

I think Dredd is a better movie, but I'm not crazy about it. I feel like Judge Dredd (1995) does a much better job of world building. You really get a sense of what is at stake, the environment, and law system. They do go too far at this, leaving little room for a potential sequel.

The newer Dredd is ridiculously confined. Its strikes me as a waste to have 95% of a movie set in an interesting and complex future set within one building as if it's trying to be Die Hard.

Running YouTube's Best Daily Vlog, Literally
https://www.youtube.com/user/VaughnJogVlog

reply

[deleted]

Yes, and Dredd isn't even the main character. His Ripley wannabe sidekick played by some talentless bimbo got most of the screentime.


Pretty much. One of the most lifeless performances I've ever seen. Haven't seen her in a movie since.

Running YouTube's Best Daily Vlog, Literally
https://www.youtube.com/user/VaughnJogVlog

reply

Yes, and Dredd isn't even the main character. His Ripley wannabe sidekick played by some talentless bimbo got most of the screentime.



Dredd got more screentime than Anderson. He's in far more scenes and dominates the second half of the film till the end.









reply

[deleted]

He's just some robot with no personality.



Except of course, he isn't either of those things.

He's not a robot and he has a taciturn, suppressed personality, not "no personality".

reply

I feel like Judge Dredd (1995) does a much better job of world building. You really get a sense of what is at stake, the environment, and law system. They do go too far at this, leaving little room for a potential sequel.




Unfortunately they forgot to include a decent story and the most important thing of all, Judge Dredd.


reply

[deleted]

At least Stallone's character is humanized and developed in this film.



Which is not what Judge Dredd is about as a character. Why bother making it if the main character is completely altered from its original intention? Which is why the film lost the point of why Judge Dredd works - other characters play off him.



He was just some drone in Dredd. How can you have a character when he leaves his mask on the entire time?



V for Vendetta managed it pretty well, so did Star Wars.




reply

[deleted]

Yeah, but I purposely gave you two contrasting examples of how it can work and still be compelling in each role, no matter the status, so, let's not leave out my primary example: V from V for Vendetta - who is the title character and a bit like Joe Dredd keeping his helmet on the whole time.

reply

Dredd shouldn't be humanised, that was the fundamental flaw with Judge Dredd (1995), it attempted to do this.
Dredd is a stoic, faceless enforcer of the law, as depicted in the comics.
Making him as some kind of tragic, misunderstood figure with sibling issues, as attempted in the '95 film, was a batrayal of the character that John Wagner and Carlos Esquerra created for the comic 2000AD!
And that's without ever mentioning the helmet removal!
Dredd (2012) was a far more faithful adaptation of the character and has been deservedly recognised as such.


Bring Back Dredd sequel Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/BringBackDredd/

reply

Judge Dredd was a bloated, muddled mess.

The effects may be better, but effects do not make a film. Stallone was painful to watch, and the rest of the cast were coasting.

All this film acieved was nearling destroying the Judge Dredd property forever. Look at the negative impact it had on Dredd years later.

"I stooped to pick a buttercup. Why people leave buttocks lying around, I've no idea."

reply