But this one takes the cake. No wonder the author of the novel wanted his name removed. They never should have attempted such difficult graphics with the technology at the time. Just horrible.
sharethe graphics were a little phony..but i like this movie i think its very good.
shareYeah, actually I just watched this movie on Encore a couple minutes ago and I didn't think it was that bad. It certainly wasn't great, but up until the last 10 minutes, I was liking it.
I could definitely see though why it got poor reviews.
Cincyfan wrote:
But this one takes the cake. No wonder the author of the novel wanted his name removed. They never should have attempted such difficult graphics with the technology at the time. Just horrible.
I haven't seen this movie, but I've read the book, which is brilliant, to say the least, but so was "Watchers", to which I've seen the movie, which is like the worst movie, based on a book I've read, that I've seen in my entire life.
this was the worst *beep* movie I've seen in years I've never been angry at myself for staying up to watch a movie before this pile of crap.
shareThree words.
Ring. Of. Darkness.
That is a much, much worse movie by a million. D:
Proud member of P.H.H.O.T.W (Paris Hilton Haters of the World)share
the CGI is extremly dated(you literally see better on the sci fi channel) and its pretty cheesy, but overall not that bad of a movie
R.O.D the tv...nuff said
i don't know what to say? i just watched it on encore and thought the beginning was promising and kinda great, but after the first 20 minutes the movie goes nowhere.
ivan