MovieChat Forums > Heat (1995) Discussion > Sympathy for Neil and his crew

Sympathy for Neil and his crew


I want to get people's opinions on what kind of people you can have sympathy for in a movie.

Neil and his crew are professional thieves and murderers. Is this sufficient for them to lose our sympathy?

In the old days of movies, the movies were made in a way that the audience would root for the "moral" person and be against the "immoral" person.

Aren't Neil and his crew as immoral as can possibly be?

If you can root for Neil and his crew, who is it that you would *not* root for in a movie?

Perhaps Hanna and Neil have similarities in their personalities, but Neil's whole purpose in life is to commit crimes for his own personal gain, and Hanna's whole purpose in life is to prevent these crimes. Doesn't that make Hanna infinitely more sympathetic than Neil?

What is it about the movie that makes people sympathetic towards Neil and his crew even though they are criminals?


Scariest words in English: We’re from the federal government and we’re here to help. R. Reagan

reply

Films like this and shows like The Wire are amazing for showing the criminals as real people and at times vulnerable, and allowing the audience to have sympathy and even respect for the villians. Something British TV/film could learn a lot from - sadly we tend to use virtue or political correctness to get the audience onside. For example, in Hustle, rather than good character development and nuance, their idea of making the audience root for the crooks/con artists is to have them give their proceeds to the poor.

reply

No sympathy for devil

reply

Any character can be sympathetic simply by spending time with them and understanding their plight. American Psycho is an honest confession and we’re with him the whole way, he’s tormented by his murderous impulses, we might hate him for killing people and animals but we sympathies with him all the same.

Narrative art had been doing this centuries before Heat.

reply

I think a lot of the arguments in this thread about "family" and "vulnerability" are ad hoc rationalizations. People may say they would never support evil, but history demonstrates otherwise.

Why do we like Neil and his crew? Because they're fascinating. They're exceptionally good at what they do. Were you interested in them after the armor car robbery? Of course. It's the same thing with the Tom Cruise character in Collateral.

Being interesting also means behaving in a way that is not predictable. Neil wraps his woman's glass in a paper towel, demonstrating that he's considerate. Cruise's Vincent buys Max's mother flowers. He's seemingly reluctant to gun down a jazz musician.

Can the mustache-twirling villain fascinate us? Sure. We expect them to do something predictably evil, and then they do something far more evil.

It's kind of funny because the men in this thread offering such rationalizations would roll their eyes at the real life women who fall in love with murderous psychopaths. "Riiiiiiiight. He's misunderstood. Deep down he's a sweet fella."

reply

You've hit it exactly, I think. These movies give us great performances by actors portraying complex characters. There's also a fascination with duality. People can be more than one thing, and that can worry people, upset them, and attract them. Somebody whose day job is stopping bad guys (Hanna) goes home and is a prick to his girlfriend, then turns around *again* and is one of the most caring people in his girlfriend's daughter's life. Meanwhile, McCauley is closed-off, but warms up to this girl. He's a bad guy but he has a moral code and an ethos we find attractive.

reply

I think its a lot simpler than that
We can root for bad guys because its fictional, and theyre cool
Like the 2 guys in pulp fiction - out and out murderers but the stars of the show.

If you knew those guys in real life you'd steer clear of them , not just to avoid getting ivolved, busted or shot
but because you dont wont to associate with people happy to take an innocent life becasue its convenient for them.
that'd be what id do anyway.

The standout monemt of cold blooded killer-ness for me is when they execute the witnesses in that first heist,
and we're all meant to be all like "oooh , the professional-ness woow "
I just thought - They could have got away with letting those civilians live , its not like they'd seen their faces.
Basically they were executed as a precaution , not because they had to be.


reply

I agree a bit, but I think the reason we resonate with movie characters is because of what they represent, how we see ourselves in them, and how "realistic" they feel, which often means nuance.

You're right: real life, I wouldn't want to hang out with hardcases like these guys, but I probably wouldn't want to hang with Pacino's character, either.

I think the witness execution moment shows us how sociopathic they are, how professional they are, and how slick the movie is going to be all at the same time.

Basically, though, I think the more nuanced a character is, the more interesting they are (with a few exceptions), and the reason people love Heat is because of the depth of the players in the story. Anybody remember War with Jet Lee and Jason Statham? Nope. Characters weren't that deep. They were slick and cool, but they don't hold a candle to the cast of Heat, so we don't care/relate to the guys from War, but we do with the guys in Heat.

reply

Between the directing and the acting they did a great job of humanizing these guys and I'll give them that. Objectively though, I feel no sympathy. The execution of that poor guard at the beginning showed these guys to be animals who had no problem killing innocent human beings simply because they felt entitled to the finer things in life without having to work for them.

reply

White, male privilege. Plain and simple. Switch the gender and race and the audience won't sympathize with them.
Check the reaction to Hustlers, like Imdb reviews.

reply

That's a fucken stretch, mate.

reply

No, it's a fact.

reply

You're a fact.

reply

Race and gender matter, but I don't think it's reducible to those characteristics. Almost nobody believes that. An ounce of image is worth a pound of performance. Movie stars come onto the screen with a reservoir of love. Who gets bigger laughs? A well-known Bill Burr doing B-minus material, or an unknown Bill Burr doing A-minus material? People will also respond more favorably to movie star Denzel Washington than some unknown white dude.

reply

Depends who the audience is. If they were black they'd sympathize with a black protagonist.

reply

I think you can sympathize with a lot of reprehensible people, or at least recognize that they're still human, too, to some extent. You can cheer for bad guys (Ocean's Eleven) depending on context and presentation. I think remembering maxims like, "Ask not for whom the bell tolls," and "there but for the Grace of God go I," are important when considering "bad" people and how we all should strive for redemption over condemnation.

However, I do think that some villains are villains - real life and fiction.

So I sympathize with Neil and his crew? To some extent, yes, but it depends which ones. Don, for instance (the replacement getaway driver) I find to be one of the most sympathetic characters in the whole movie. Turino, however, uses a girl as a human shield and comes off slimy to me. (Bosko's pretty sleazy, on the cop side)

I feel the most sympathy for Don, Neil, and Chris, although Neil and Chris each have heavy flaws. Chris is clearly in a pattern of bad behaviour that it's bringing a heavy toll on his marriage and relationships. Neil cuts himself off. Both gain sympathy as they care for people in their lives.

The irony, however, is that Al Pacino's Vincent Hanna loses sympathy from me when he lets his marriage fall apart. Of course, he gets a tonne of it for how well he treats his step-daughter.

I think the reason we sympathize with these guys is because Heat presents us with "real" people. They feel fully-developed. They aren't cookie-cutter anything. They're flawed. They're complex. They have good and bad. They have moral codes (Neil) that they follow even while being evil. Because we see them as human, we can sympathize. They aren't (mostly) total psychopaths. They're deeply flawed, but relatable.

At the end of the day, though, I never sympathized with them enough to want them to escape. I always wanted the law to win while watching this film. So maybe I'm not the right guy to ask. I don't think they're good or role models or anything.

reply

To be honest, I didn't know anyone was sympathetic toward Neil and his crew?? 1st I've heard this??

reply