MovieChat Forums > Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995) Discussion > What rating would the producer's cut hav...

What rating would the producer's cut have on here?

posted 8 years ago by OneWayTicketToHell
9 replies | jump to latest

I'd say it would be a 5

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] bigolebails 7 years ago

Yeaaaahhhh. 5. Its still badly made

[–] 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] bigolebails 7 years ago

Hey at least it's consistently devoid of gapping plot holes. For that, the producers cut gets points in my back. Also Tommy's reduction to a supporting character is much more in tone with the rest of the ensemble cast film that the producers cut is.... still *beep* though.

[–] 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Minus_The_Beer 7 years ago

I always thought the fetuses were abortions/miscarriages of Jamie and Michael's previous hellspawn. After all, she was in captivity for 6 years. 

Anyone here mentions Hotel California dies before the first line clears his lips.

[–] 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] falseprophet616 7 years ago

Watch III. It is a Halloween film in tone, style and spirit with many homages made by one of the people who portrayed The Shape in the original.

Yes, the ending is a bit of a mess. Yes, it has too many ideas. Still a great movie and much better than 4-6.

[–] Minus_The_Beer 7 years ago

I personally give it the same rating I give the theatrical: 5/10

Both are horribly flawed films no matter how you slice it. I imagine the user rating would probably hover around a 6.5/10, a high rating for a horror sequel on this website. Due to its obscurity and overblown reputation, I could see that happening.

Anyone here mentions Hotel California dies before the first line clears his lips.