Revenge or Forgiveness?


I'd like to ask if you were in the position of Mr.Delacroix or Mr. and Mrs.Precy and you were given the options of either killing Mathew Poncelet or forgiving him what would you do?

reply

Don't know. But in position of a Judge, I would give him the Life Sentence.

Justice isn't neither about revenge nor forgiving.

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

well i believe that we as humans can not do perfect justice so we are left with our extra favor or less favor which results in injustice.
Or may be you didn't understand my question cause in our country family of the victim can forgive the killer and the latter can be a free man.

reply

///in our country family of the victim can forgive the killer and the latter can be a free man. ///

It's a good tradition. Which country are you from?

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

PAKISTAN...:)

reply

Knowing that your country does practice Death Penalty (note I do not judge or criticise) I admire the tradition you mentioned, and hope that the criminals spared from death by the nobleness of their victims' families, will reconsider their lives, and become better people in the future granted to them so mercifully.

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

And I just wonder why they put Pakistani/Indian (same) instrumental music in the end credits. I admire it too, a victim's family can forgive. But I also heard that in non-intentional murder, there is another way, that is to pay a "life debt" (money) kinda thing to victim's family?

reply

Itsn not about "Revenge" or "Forgiveness".

Its about "Justice"...

reply

the Execution has nothing to do with Justice.

Maybe with the "Justice".

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

I hope that I would forgive as I believe that hating someone hurts yourself more than the person you hate but I would never for a second blame anyone who didn't forgive under those circumstances.

If I could chose his fate it would be life without the possibility of parole.

reply

[deleted]

The killer is responsible for how his/her own family feels about losing him as he/she was the one who committed the crime that resulted in him/her ending up where he/she did in the first place. The victims' families have every right to be angry and want to see bad things happen to the animal who did that to their loved ones (this is why it is not the family that prosecutes the criminal or enacts the sentence). Why are you blaming the victims' family for something the animal did? Where is your compassion for the victims' families?

Not everyone is or wants to be Christian, so that is why there are secular laws in the U.S. Also, looking back through the Christian Bible, there are plenty of examples of a vengeful god there, in both testaments.

That said, I am not a fan of the D.P. because it is not evenly applied across the country. Poor people and minorities are not able to get the best representation and sometimes evidence is misinterpreted. *IF* we could get to a point where evidence was conclusive and there was no doubt, I'd be totally fine with the DP. As it is, I do not like the idea of tax money being used to feed, clothe, entertain and give medical attention to someone who chose to do something so horrible. I much prefer the idea of creating a prison that is self-sufficient. They grow their own food, make their own fabric for clothes, etc. If they chose not to participate, they don't get to eat. This way no public money would be wasted on someone who has chosen to be a danger to society.

reply

False binary.

I'd do what Sister Helen Prejean did. Try to understand human suffering, even Poncelet's suffering, in all its unresolvable complexity.

reply

I'd ask for a baseball bat and five minutes alone with the SOB. Only one of us would survive the interview, and it would be me.

reply

How is Poncelet suffering, apart from being a sniveling little pussy, who doesnt want what he did to others, done to him?

reply

I'd like to make him really snivel and beg; a pair of pliers and a blow torch.

reply

It is hard to imagine being in the position but I still think I would not kill him but especially not forgive him, I would expect the government to carry out its punishment for the crime.

reply

i have the opinion if you kill more than 1 person (aka a mass murderer) and perfectly sane then you should be sentenced to death. I believe he killed the male, yet raped the girl. Definitely a life sentence with no parole.

reply

Forgive him for raping and murdering two innocent people? Inconceivable. Revenge would be fully justified, but on a practical level executing him removes the possibility that he will ever harm anyone else, and saves the taxpayers the exorbitant cost of supporting him in prison for the rest of his worthless life. The world became a better, safer place the second he died.

reply