Better than Smoke!!????


wow...just seen this and enjoyed it even more than the original - which I thought was great. Some of the scenes were hilarious. Anyone else feel the same?

reply

Yeah, but first let me say, why compare Smoke with this. It's not fare. Think of it as a surreal sequal to Smoke. Actually, both movies were made back to back. Things I love about movie:

1) Scene between owner and Jackie Robinson.
2) Scene when guy comes in selling watches, and at the end when he comes in selling cigars, I believe.
3) Owner playing guitar at the end.
4) Rosanne was great in this.
5) Augie's block party with baby Jackie Robinson.
6) Jared Harris as Augie's employee.
7) Jim Jarmusch mimicking Germans officers smoking cigarettes.

Glad somebody feels the same way about this original movie. It was a lot of fun.

reply

i was actually diappointed with Roseanne, but the scene where Jarmusch is smoking his last is hilarious

reply

All the ones you mentioned are great, but I canĀ“t believe you skipped the AMAZING LOU REED MOMENTS.

best speeches ever. can someone quote them?

reply

Yes, I'm smoking cigarettes and many of my friends have died of it. On the other hand, while I'm smoking cigarettes, I'm not downing a bottle of Scotch in 15 minutes. So looked at from this point of view, it's a health tool.

brilliant.

reply

One of the scenes I like is Ian Frazier (New Yorker writer) talking about his bags in trees project. If you look around any city, you'll start to notice a lot of shopping bags blowing around and get stuck on trees. I've seen it all the time in Boston and Portland, ME. Ian F. and his friends made a long pole (50 feet long or whatever) to remove shopping bags from trees. Paul Auster or Wayne Wang must have heard about this and so he came on camera and talked about it.

About 10 years later, Ian Frazier wrote this article. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/01/12/bags-in-trees-a-retrospective

Here is a short article he wrote in 1993, just to give you a general idea.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1993/05/24/stuck-in-trees

I now live in Portland, ME, which no has a five cents a bag law. You pay five cents extra for a bag. I hardly ever get any bag at all and I think a lot of people do the same.



reply

I agree I thought this was funnier than Smoke.

reply

I too, agree with you guys. I love this movie and love to rewatch it. Great episodes, great dialogues, great music!

I'll be back.

reply

I liked it a little more than smoke, but not much. Smoke was excellent as well.

Keep talking, yahweh,
Keep fu*king talking

reply

[deleted]

I always dug this movie over smoke! Nice to know others agree.

reply

We have ways of making you talk, augie.

reply

I guess I'm the only one who liked Smoke more? I didn't like the monologues at all, but preferred just the story as in Smoke.

reply

I enjoyed BLUE IN THE FACE more, but it's probably just a matter of taste. "BLUE" has a nice topless scene by Ms. Gorham, which added considerably to my enjoyment; but I also liked the humor.

reply

Better than Smoke? No way. Funnier than Smoke, Yes. But not better. Smoke is a masterpiece, a poetic, beautiful mixture of great characters and fascinating stories. Blue in the face is at best a combination of "behind the scenes" and "deleted scenes" from Smoke. The plot in Blue in the face is really bad. I dont care about Rosseanne and Vins trip to Las Vegas. But the improvised little situations are great. Lou Reed is great. Jim Jarmusch is great. But Smoke is a far better film!!

reply

Not a better movie than Smoke, but I enjoyed watching it and it had some very funny bits. The scene with the guy describing his frustration with plastic bags in trees, and scenes with Jim Jarmusch, Michael J Fox and Loue Reed were highlights for me.

reply

I like both about equally. The improv in Blue in the Face is fun.

reply