MovieChat Forums > Tom and Huck (1995) Discussion > 'Tom and Huck' vs 'The Adventures Of Huc...

'Tom and Huck' vs 'The Adventures Of Huck Finn'


I liked Huck Finn better.

"You guys are like mummy magnets!" - Jonathan Carnahan

reply

i liked tom and huck better but thats just my opinion

reply

tom and huck is a kid's movie. the adventures of huckleberry finn is a mixture between a kid's novel and an adult novel. it explores many more themes than the movie and is therefore much more insightful. the movie is very entertaining though.

reply

Yeah either way though neither of the two are closely related to the books anyway

reply

I`ve read both of the books and seen both of the movies. Huck Finn is more related to the book, but the movie took the spirit away from it - I find it boring. When I was little I found it scary and boring.

So my answer would be that I prefer Tom & Huck over The Adventures of Huck Finn. Definately.

reply

When I was a kid my choice would've been Tom and Huck. Now its Huck Finn. Better script, better acting, better everything really.

reply

I always wondered why they didn't do Huck Finn as the proper sequel to this movie instead of recasting the role with Elijah Wood and doing a whole new movie.

"What kind of scary ass clowns came to your birthday party?"

reply

I always wondered why they didn't do Huck Finn as the proper sequel to this movie instead of recasting the role with Elijah Wood and doing a whole new movie.


The Adventures of Huck Finn came first and then Tom & Huck, Elijah Wood was recast with Brad Renfro.

That being said, I have always liked Adventures of Huck Finn better, I just learned today that Tom & Huck was written & produced by Stephen Sommers, so I guess it was a sequel of sorts to Adventures of Huck Finn.

Dragonzord! Mastodon! Pterodactyl! Triceratops! Saber Toothed Tiger! Tyrannosaurus!

reply

Brad renfro did an amazing job as Huck.

reply

They wanted to cast Wood as Huck in this film as well, but he was busy making FLIPPER and couldn't do it. That is why Renfro got the part. I prefer Renfro's Huck to Wood's; Renfro has more edge and seems more dangerous, the way you could imagine Huck really being. I wonder if they rewrote the role to suit Renfro's "bad boy" image. The character certainly seems a lot different than the one Wood played in the previous film. It's hard to imagine Wood's sweet but mischievous Huck as being the same character from this film, where he is definitely not sweet.

reply