The majority of you are correct. If Simon and his son had reconciled, that would have been too neat, and unbelievable, and unrealistic, and this film was made to be realistic. Besides, can you really blame the son for his coldness and hostility? He's justified, if you think about it, because his father had abandoned the family years earlier, when the son was a toddler, and never even so much as contacted them. (If you suddenly encountered your father who never even so much as contacted you since leaving when you were a child, wouldn't you be at least bitter too? I don't think one would be able to be all forgiving in an instant, after a lifetime of that.) They DID reconcile. At least Simon did. His son chose not to accept it. That's all that mattered to him, that he see him, so he wouldn't regret that he at least got to see his son. It didn't matter to him that it wasn't reciprocated. This also served as both an example and a warning to Monty, that he was on the same path as Simon's son, and he too would eventually end up bitter if he didn't forgive his own father for doing similiar to him and his mother, so he could thus move on with his life. Besides also, if Simon and his son had reconciled (that is, if his son had accepted Simon's offer of reconciliation), then the funeral scene would have been pointless, as Monty, Everett, Courtney and Jeff would no longer be his "family," and in fact, they wouldn't have been in the first place, as their whole relationship would have been for nothing. Again, the obvious intention was to make this film realistic, and it succeeds at just that. Like another poster indicated above, life isn't always a bed of roses. It is sometimes sweet, and sometimes bitter.
reply
share