Why was Dominique arrested?


I'm usually good a following foreign films even more than english movies coz I am 100% focused but I didn't get it.

reply

She was accused of Karol's murder, that's why she got jailed.

The same day Karol "dies", Dominique arrives to Poland, something quite "suspicious". Besides the unexpected change of Karol's will makes her the main suspect.

Kieslowski doesn't explain in detail the legal technicisms about her arrest because that's not the point. But in short: the "murder" of Karol is the reason why she was arrested.

reply

I too had a hard time understanding this at first. After soem thought I think he had her set up for his murder and/or fraudulently executing his estate so that she would find herself on the wrong side of the law with all her freedoms taken away in a foreign county. Thereby she would suffer the same fate that he was subjected to in the beginning of the movie so they would have established equality in their relationship and be able to reconcile their marriage.

Seems kinda far fetched to me but, hey, it seemed to work within the confines of the story.

reply

Karol's people altered her passport to make it appear as if she had been in Poland on the day he died. because his entire estate was left to her, it was easy to establish motive. since she wasted no time in executing the will, she looked suspicious

reply

It was never explained in detail but we have to assume that the authorities had more incriminating evidence than merely a doctored passport and a loosely cobbled together motive.

It should have been easy for her to establish that she was in fact in Paris on the day Karol was "murdered". She will have countless witness statements and perhaps material evidence to prove beyond doubt that she was not in Poland and hence that her passport was doctored. This is to say nothing of the records kept by French Passport control establishing beyond doubt the day that she exited France - that this was some time after she was informed of the death and subsequent funeral.
There are too many how, when, and why type questions.
How was she informed that she was a benefactor in Karol's will? Phone call? Letter? And when was she informed? Why was she informed of her inheritance before his funeral? Was it an appeal to her greed, so as to ensure that she would attend the funeral?
How was she supposed to have adjusted Karol's will to make herself the sole benefactor? The draftsman of the will will also be questioned as an accomplice in a premeditated murder conspiracy and he may well explain what really happened.

So many other reasons why she would not be arrested. A flight booked to Hong Kong! Evidence of their sexual liaison the night before she was arrested. An exhumation of the decapitated Russian body etc etc.

Anyway, the way that "dead" Karol was walking the streets in plain view should have rendered all of the above redundant after a short while.

This must be the ultimate pseudo-intellectual movie imho. But hey, switch off your brain and delight in the deeper meaning. Equality man! Whatever.

reply

All good points Allywheels. I hear a lot about this trilogy and was really expecting something more from this.. I guess this is the film they talk least about from the trilogy and now I know why.

I quite enjoyed Three Colours Blue (at least for the character elements although I'm not sure there was all that much in the way of storyline) and I enjoyed the start of this film, I found Karol to be quite an interesting character and really felt for him up until he got to Poland..

It was as though he became a completely different person when he left France (which I guess is supported by the fact that his wife loved who he was in Poland but not who he became in France)..

It was hard to get behind him when he was setting his wife up for his murder though.. I think I would have preferred that he found another way to reconcile with his wife.. Show her that he could be the man she originally fell in love with..

It was certainly a very far fetched ending which seemed a step away from the tone of three colours blue and the start of this film..

I mean how on earth would he even have been able to get into the prison to see her in the window, and what brilliant luck that she was stood at the window at that exact moment!

reply

The point of this movie, along with equality in love, is social satire that contrasts the East of Europe with the West. That's why there is hyperbole (exaggeration) and departure from verisimilitude (non-realistic elements). It goes with the genre of satirical comedy, folks!

The gist of it is that Poland is (or was, under Communism) such an unfair society that one is able to frame an innocent person despite the tons of evidence that would free her in a just society. Ironically, the hero uses this unfairness to even the score between himself and his ex.

I don't think it is resolved at all that he will free her in order to resume their marriage. He cries because he wishes he could do so, but knows it would be a mistake to trust her again (he remembers her dressed in white on their wedding day, alluding to the vows she broke).

reply

I don't think it is resolved at all that he will free her in order to resume their marriage. He cries because he wishes he could do so, but knows it would be a mistake to trust her again ...
Agreed. They both appear to actually love one another, but trusting in each other is a completely different kettle of fish.

Yes, I think we just have to assume she was neatly framed for the "murder", though IRL you'd generally think the authorities would have to establish a much stronger case to achieve a conviction. I don't think Krzysztof Kieślowski could be too bothered turning the film into a police procedural.🐭

reply

There is a prison near me where people are on the streets all the time communicating (sign language or morse code) with the people inside. You can see about a square foot window of their cell from the street. So why not there also?

reply