MovieChat Forums > Spanking the Monkey (1994) Discussion > Think Ray could have been adopted?

Think Ray could have been adopted?


I was kind of holding on for a later reveal that they weren't actually related. It first crossed my mind that he might be adopted in the scene where his mother talks about 'the deal' and how his father didn't want kids, and then they were interrupted before she could finish that thought. Then his mother was so casual after their drunken act, flirting with the doctor in front of Ray and everything, it seemed bizarre that she could go on like that after having sex (we assume) with her own son.

Although the mother was clearly a little deranged, the attraction was clearly a two-way thing, as we saw Ray finding it hard to look away as he helped his mother in the shower previously. I just find it hard to believe two blood relatives like a mother and son could be sexually attracted to each other, even before there was tension between them. Perhaps I'm naive in these matters. There's also the father's complete emotional disattachment from his son.

What do you guys think? The film never explicitly says Ray was her biological son... but then it really didn't seem like it wanted to be ambiguous either.

reply

Whilst I understand that there were some subtleties about the family unit left perhaps a little unclear I don't think they could have been related.

The actions of the mother the next day seems like a classic act of denial designed to create the illusion that nothing has changed and all is well. The fact that she overdoes it is the telltale element however. Their sexual encounters later do not seem to come about in a conventional sense thereafter anyhow. It's also very telling that their sexual activity is undoubtedly linked to their annoyance with each other by being trapped in such a small situation, completely unable to be seperate for any real length of time. Although the initial foreplay scene is much more tender, the rest of the sexual acts in scenes thereafter are realtively angry and even violent. Here we see a much truer nature of the damage done by incestual relationships.

The 'deal' with the father I thought was made relatively clear: The father would have children only if she didn't go to medical school and become a doctor. He saw it as impossible or ill advised for the mother to try and have both a career and children.

As for the two-way attraction I understand your cynicism, naive or not, and I certainly appriciate that line of thinking, but incest is something that happens. As for the father's detatchment, I think it's understandable given the way the character is written: He cheats, he dislikes being at home, everything is financial including his rather expensive son and he never wanted to have children in the first place.

I understand that it doesn't state overtly that Ray was their biological son but I don't really think it makes any sense for him to be adopted. If the father didn't want a son of his own then he certainly wouldn't adopt. And also why would the director deliberately undermine the premise of his own film; a film made to inspire reaction and debate beacuse (in my opinion at least) to be honest it's a surprisingly average film considering it won a Sundance Festival award.

reply

The fact that the writer/director chose not to make it clear that the mother is or isn't related to the son by blood is probably intended.

I am leaning towards that he was either adopted or that she is a stepmom, solely from the conversation he had on the phone with his dad talking about the sex. The father said that he has known his mother for 20yrs. and knows what she is capable of and that she wouldn't do such a thing. To me that sounds like a father speaking to his adopted son or a father speaking to his son in regards to his stepmother.

reply

After just watching, I believe they are related. The conversation they had on the bed about why she didn't become a doctor says it all. She gave up her career to have him. If the dad had known her for 20 years and Ray is 18 years old, seems highly likely they are blood. Incest is as old as time, look at the bible.

reply

I don't think so. Incest is clearly the theme here.

I haven't killed a man since 1984

reply

I think she was his mother but the father was a different person. I think the "deal" the mother mentions is this: the father didn't want kids and the mother wanted to go to med school. She got pregnant with someone else (an affair) and he agreed to raise the kid as his (their) own if she would agree to give up her career and be subservient to her husband. She bought into the agreement and then lived up to it.

reply

So here comes another BLOOD IS THICKER THAN WATER type comment (I mean yours).

So you think only people who adopted children have sex with their children, sex-abuse or otherwise?

It is the people with unwanted children who usually practice incest, mostly child abuse rather than plain incest (having sex with your children who are 18+).

Adopted parents usually have reasons why they adopted. First of all, they really must want children, and secondly they must go through a huge bureaucracy of screening process in which the adoption agent/organization checks every little detail and background of of the adopting party. This is an extremely difficult process (for the parents wanting to adopt) in which the agent must determine if the parents are suitable and are fit to adopt, their criminal record, income level, how long they have been married, why they want to adopt children, could they have their own, if not what was the problem, if they could and decided not to, why. Given all these difficulties, the social serve checks on regularly and interviews the child after the approval to determine how the parents are treating the child and if he/she is happy/unhappy. This process is excluded if the child is an infant or toddler upon adoption. The adopting parents don't go through all this just so they can practice incest. It was very, very unfair of you to easily assume that Ray was adopted just because of the assumed sex.

For married people who could and have children, it is not difficult (you know the oops, I forgot to take pills and "forget the condom" business). I am not saying this for all, some do really want children and make plans before stopping the birth control procedures. There are also so many unwanted and unloved children in the world who are born unwantedly, born into poverty, born because it was enforced by a particular religion/culture, born because somebody went on and on about how much they wanted grandchildren (this happens in my culture, old lady always want a grandchild no matter how much the parents aren't ready financially). Many children around the world are hated, abused, molested, brainwashed, and so on, everyday. Yes, these are all biological (not adopted) children.

Some practice incest voluntarily. Say if your mother is only 20 years your senior (plus good looking), the now fully developed son with sexual desires can be easily sexually turned on. It could happen if the two parties in question aren't biological parent/child. It could happen to biological parent/child. But please, it is not a plain black and white. Every time somebody says things like, "the mother had sex with her son, he must be adopted," it really hurts people with adopted children.

reply

i agree that they were blood related but gokool-david's comment about adoptive parents was ignorant.

people who adopt are just as capable of abusing children equally -if not more than biological parents. you assume that people that adopt didn't have it easy when it came to childbearing but you are dead wrong. if you want to talk about oral contraceptives and lack of condoms let's talk about the "old" couples who previously have spent their lives partying hard, having NUMEROUS abortions during their 20's and 30's, 100 boyfriends and girlfriends along the way, and lots and lots of freaky sex before they get married much later and decide "oh, isn't it time to have children now? i'm nearly a senior citizen" only to find out their body no longer operates (of course!) and they must look for other means of acquiring children

and then their are the numerous weirdos that adopt to abuse.

just because they fill out 100 forms doesn't mean that they are not STILL freaky weirdo sexual people. actually, they're more likely to be in touch w/ some weird sexual tendencies in my thinking

reply

i think its safe to say treazzure pulled that load out of nowhere.

reply

Since you seem to be a person of reason, let me throw another curve:

Just because you're related to somebody, doesn't mean that you cannot have tabooic relationships with that person. Mom, Dad, Sister, Brother, Niece, Nephew, and words like it are only nouns to describe how you know a person. When the human senses perceive something that could be perceived as something that is arousing, there's no cultural norm that will interrupt that; the key is NOT to act on your impulses. My godmother is a relatively attractive woman (she's in her late 40s) - looking at her doesn't do anything for me (she's thin and I'm a chubby chaser), but if in a drunken or drugged moment, if she made a pass at me, I might return the gesture. Most will say that it's sick, but as far as I'm concerned, it shouldn't matter what two people do, as long as nobody's getting hurt.

In all senses of the relationship between Raymond and his mother, they could actually continue the relationship, telling nobody about it, and it shouldn't be the business of anyone else.

Stop stealing! The government hates competition!

reply

nevermind the incest. they didn't treat him like a biological son. but unfortunately parents abuse their blood children.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
& the dog says woof woof & the cat says meow.

reply

Nah. I was expecting that kind of easy cop out to come, but grateful that it didn't. I definitely think the writing before they have sex could have used a lot more work to make the whole think more convincing when it happens, but I didn't think it was bad either.

___
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8jj89Ub1y1r6hszbo1_500.gif

reply